Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-14500 vs Intel Core i9-14900

Intel Core i5-14500

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-14500 is a fast and relative efficient desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which was introduced in 2022. The processor offers a base clock of 2.6 GHz and reaches up to 5.0 GHz in Turbo. The hybrid CPU architecture introduced with Alder Lake is also used in the Raptor Lake processors. Compared to the Intel Core i5-13500, however, the Intel Core i5-14500 only offers a slight advantage. The number of cores is identical and Intel has only minimally increased the clock rates of the P and E cores in the Core i5-14500.

Performance

Due to the same number of physical computing units, the Intel Core i5-14500 only offers a minimal difference in performance compared to the Intel Core i5-13500, which is only due to the increased clock rates. Compared to the even older Intel Core i5-12500, which has to make do completely without E-cores, the performance difference is significantly higher.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i5-13500, the Intel Core i5-14500 offers an integrated graphics unit. The already widespread Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, nothing has changed with the new Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i5-14500 is 65 watts, with the option to increase this to up to 154 watts in Turbo mode. Compared to the Intel Core i5-13500, Intel has not made any changes to the TDP limits.

Intel Core i9-14900

► remove from comparison Intel i9-14900

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a high-end processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture. The base clock is 2 GHz and can reach up to 5.8 GHz under optimal conditions. Similar to the top model (Intel Core i9-14900K), the total of 32 threads are divided into 8 p- and 16 e-cores. The 8 performance cores (p-cores) also offer hyperthreading, which means that a total of 32 threads can be processed simultaneously. The non-K model is an economical processor. There is still the option of DDR4 or DDR5 memory.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i9-14900K, the Core i9-14900 offers the same number of physical computing units. However, due to the lower power consumption, the Intel Core i9-14900 delivers slightly less performance. The intended use is primarily for compact PCs with limited cooling options.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i9-14900K, the Intel Core i9-14900 offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The Intel Core i9-14900 is specified with a TDP of 65 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 219 watts (PL2). However, this requires very good cooling. Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900, the specified power consumption has not changed.

ModelIntel Core i5-14500Intel Core i9-14900
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-RIntel Raptor Lake-R
Series: Raptor Lake-R Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-14900K compare3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K compare2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-149002 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700 compare1.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500 « 2.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T compare1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900K compare3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K compare2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900 « 2 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700 compare1.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-145002.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T compare1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock2600 - 5000 MHz2000 - 5800 MHz
L2 Cache11.5 MB32 MB
L3 Cache24 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 20
6 x 5.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
24 / 32
8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP65 Watt65 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2154 Watt219 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size215 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA 1700
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.dewww.intel.de
$549 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-14500
39.9 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900
47.2 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
114 Points (64%)
129 Points (72%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
799 Points (15%)
1245 Points (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15012 Points (14%)
31070 Points (29%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1917 Points (81%)
2212 Points (94%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
736 Points (82%)
846 Points (94%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5811 Points (14%)
11291 Points (28%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2435 Points (15%)
4793 Points (30%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
273 Points (77%)
315 Points (88%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
28.8 Points (37%)
56.6 Points (73%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (79%)
3.8 Points (90%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9388 Points (57%)
12284 Points (74%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
52699 Points (38%)
82492 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
82201 Points (52%)
121768 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15313 Points (19%)
17590 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
192.2 s (2%)
85.6 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.7 s (1%)
2.4 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7912 Points (13%)
12359 Points (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
54851 MIPS (31%)
101652 MIPS (58%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6198 MIPS (73%)
7276 MIPS (86%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
138.1 fps (46%)
222 fps (74%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
318 fps (73%)
358.5 fps (83%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
16.4 fps (29%)
31.6 fps (56%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.4 GB/s (41%)
2.4 GB/s (71%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.5 GB/s (43%)
4.9 GB/s (84%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
12.4 GB/s (32%)
18.5 GB/s (48%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
396 Seconds (5%)
263 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
223 Seconds (2%)
131 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
0.4 sec (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15233 Points (32%)
18728 Points (40%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.4 s (2%)
5.8 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.5 s (1%)
12.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
396.9 s (2%)
303.4 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
68578 Points (53%)
93183 Points (72%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
18692 Points (47%)
28622 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
85785 Points (70%)
88787 Points (72%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
87832 Points (71%)
90442 Points (73%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
99473 Points (83%)
93001 Points (77%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
17752 Points (45%)
20179 Points (51%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
24708 Points (44%)
42316 Points (75%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
9657 Points (41%)
19492 Points (82%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2583 Points (65%)
3022 Points (75%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
10644 Points (41%)
15962 Points (62%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2497 Points (79%)
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
10295 Points (42%)
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1898 Points (74%)
2140 Points (84%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
10543 Points (19%)
17395 Points (31%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1842 Points (8%)
2077 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10477 Points (33%)
17218 Points (54%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7873 Points (79%)
9143 Points (91%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
40233 Points (40%)
67178 Points (67%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
506 ms (1%)
436 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
262 Points (72%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
278 Points (50%)
315 Points (57%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1625 Points (61%)
2133 Points (80%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
95.1 Watt (16%)
145.5 Watt (25%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
118.7 Watt (22%)
253 Watt (46%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.9 Watt (6%)
29.9 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
20.5 Points per Watt (15%)
18.9 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-14500 → 100% n=53

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900 → 146% n=53

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 26. 05:39:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18025 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18150 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Apr 2025 05:16:04 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18025 +0.002s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 18025 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18150 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 18150 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.036s ... 0.051s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.053s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)