Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D vs AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

► remove from comparison

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 9800X3D

Der AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D ist ein High-End-Prozessor, der speziell für Gamer und anspruchsvolle Anwender entwickelt wurde. Er basiert auf der neuesten Zen-5-Architektur von AMD und wird im fortschrittlichen 4-nm-Verfahren gefertigt, was nicht nur höhere Effizienz, sondern auch eine bessere Leistung ermöglicht. Mit seinen 8 Kernen und 16 Threads bietet der 9800X3D eine solide Basis für rechenintensive Anwendungen.

Der größte Vorteil des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D ist die 3D V-Cache-Technologie, die komplett überarbeitet wurde und sich signifikant von den Modellen der 7000er-Serie unterscheidet. Die Änderungen resultieren in einer deutlich gesteigerten Taktfrequenz und einer besseren Wärmeverteilung. Der interne Aufbau besteht weiterhin aus einem I/O-Die sowie einem CCD. Letzterer beinhaltet die 8 Kerne sowie den 3D V-Cache und wird im 4nm-Prozess hergestellt. Beim I/O-Die hält AMD weiterhin am 6nm-Herstellungsprozess fest. Die Taktraten steigen im Vergleich zum Vorgängermodell spürbar. So beträgt der Basistakt 4,7 GH/z, wenngleich im Turbo bis zu 5,2 GH/s möglich sind.

Neben der überragenden Gaming-Performance überzeugt der AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D auch in produktiven Anwendungen. Während er speziell auf Spieleoptimierung ausgelegt ist, schneidet er in Anwendungen wie 3D-Modellierung, Videobearbeitung und anderen kreativen Workloads spürbar besser ab als ein AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Die Leistungsaufnahme des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D beträgt 120 Watt, welche als PPT maximal 162 Watt beträgt. Damit gibt es in diesem Punkt keine Änderungen im Vergleich zum AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Aufgrund gesteigerter Leistung kann die Effizienz des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D spürbar gesteigert werden. An die Effizienz der Arrow-Lake-Prozessoren kommt AMD allerdings trotz deutlich besserer Gaming-Leistung nicht heran.

Hier geht es zu unserem Test des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D.

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

The Ryzen 9 9950X is a very, very powerful desktop CPU of the Granite Ridge product family that features 16 Zen 5 cores (32 threads), PCIe 5 support and a basic iGPU. The Ryzen was launched in June 2024, with sales slated to start in August.

The 9950X shares some of the specifications with the mighty Zen 4-powered Ryzen 9 7950X, including (but not limited to) the 16 MB L2 cache, the 64 MB L3 cache, the 5.7 GHz top clock speed and the 170 W long-term TDP.

Architecture and Features

Just like Strix Point APUs, Granite Ridge processors make use of the new Zen 5 microarchitecture. However, there are no efficient cores here; all of 9950X's cores are full Zen 5 cores. Furthermore, Granite Ridge is a multi-die design with only the CPU cores produced using a fairly modern 4 nm TSMC process. Strix Point processors are a single-die design, from what we know.

According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the 9950X has an impressive 64 MB of L3 cache and 24 direct PCIe 5 lanes (3.93 GB/s throughput per lane) with up to 12 additional PCIe 4 lanes available depending on the motherboard. It supports DDR5 RAM as fast as 5,600 MT/s (up to 8,000 MT/s if overclocked).

The 9950X is unlocked for overclocking. Naturally, the AM5 socket CPU supports Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 as well as many Linux distros.

Performance

According to early July leaks, its multi-thread performance is about as good as that of the 24-core Core i9-14900K Intel CPU. We'll definitely update this section once we get our hands on a system powered by the 9950X.

Graphics

The Radeon 610M comes equipped with just 128 unified shaders running at up to 2,200 MHz. Its gaming performance is slated to be extremely low and only just sufficient for pre-2020 games in resolutions such as 1024x768.

Power consumption

The CPU cores are built with TSMC's N4P process for good, as of mid 2024, power efficiency. (Apple is the leader in this regard with the second-generation 3 nm process.)

The Ryzen 9's long-term TDP is 170 W. It'll probably consume up to 250 W when under heavy short-term loads. If overclocked, the power consumption figures will increase significantly.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 9950X3DAMD Ryzen 7 9800X3DAMD Ryzen 9 9950X
CodenameGranite RidgeGranite RidgeGranite Ridge
SeriesAMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)AMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)AMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)
Series: Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5) Granite Ridge
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D « 4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D « 4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X « 4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock4300 - 5700 MHz4700 - 5200 MHz4300 - 5700 MHz
L2 Cache16 MB8 MB16 MB
L3 Cache128 MB96 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 32
16 x 5.7 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 5
16 / 32
16 x 5.7 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP170 Watt120 Watt170 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm & 6 nm
SocketAM5AM5 (LGA 1718)AM5
FeaturesDDR5-5600 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, HCPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, EVP, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, SHA, XFR2DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache640 KB1 MB
TDP Turbo PL2162 Watt
Transistors9970 Million
Voltage1.28 - 1.31 (nominal), 1.4 (max) V
Die Size192.6 mm2
max. Temp.95 °C95 °C
$479 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 9950X3D
52.1 pt (87%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 9800X3D
47.5 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen 9 9950X
51.6 pt (86%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
138.4 Points (78%)
132 Points (74%)
136 Points (76%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
2365 Points (44%)
1358 Points (25%)
2254 Points (42%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
42018 Points (39%)
23230 Points (22%)
40924 Points (38%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2259 Points (96%)
2080 Points (88%)
2202 Points (94%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
886 Points (98%)
818 Points (91%)
871 Points (97%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
16347 Points (40%)
9057 Points (22%)
15788 Points (38%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
6536 Points (41%)
3647 Points (23%)
6335 Points (40%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
350 Points (98%)
328 Points (92%)
344 Points (97%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
41.7 Points (54%)
72.3 Points (94%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (91%)
min: 4.03     avg: 4     median: 4 (96%)     max: 4.21 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8933 Points (54%)
9402 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60825 Points (44%)
71611 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
119288 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
16618 Points (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
54.3 s (1%)
29.3 s (0%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.3 s (0%)
2.1 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
15574 Points (25%)
13778 Points (22%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
163125 MIPS (94%)
90354 MIPS (52%)
160423 MIPS (92%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
7783 MIPS (92%)
8484 MIPS (100%)
7852 MIPS (93%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
203 fps (68%)
271 fps (91%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
375.5 fps (87%)
392 fps (90%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
48.5 fps (85%)
30.6 fps (54%)
45.1 fps (79%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.7 GB/s (50%)
3.4 GB/s (100%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.9 GB/s (50%)
5.6 GB/s (97%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
17.8 GB/s (46%)
32.4 GB/s (84%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
113 Seconds (1%)
204 Seconds (3%)
118 Seconds (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
75 Seconds (1%)
137 Seconds (1%)
77 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.3 sec (7%)
0.3 sec (7%)
0.3 sec (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 17855     avg: 18234     median: 18224 (39%)     max: 18723 Points
21838 Points (46%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
7.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
15.6 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 106182     avg: 108509     median: 108630 (83%)     max: 109721 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
40609 Points (100%)
min: 34973     avg: 38176     median: 38658 (95%)     max: 40153 Points
38269 Points (94%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 104270     avg: 105425     median: 105457 (86%)     max: 106627 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 104072     avg: 105335     median: 105271 (85%)     max: 106576 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 106846     avg: 108682     median: 108620 (90%)     max: 112948 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 28550     avg: 29171     median: 29197 (74%)     max: 29573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
49235 Points (88%)
min: 38742     avg: 39130     median: 39114 (70%)     max: 39893 Points
49522 Points (88%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
16950 Points (71%)
min: 14848     avg: 15705     median: 15741 (66%)     max: 16218 Points
16112 Points (68%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
3434 Points (86%)
min: 3213     avg: 3278     median: 3285.5 (82%)     max: 3337 Points
3408 Points (85%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
22405 Points (87%)
min: 17704     avg: 18142     median: 18155.5 (70%)     max: 18574 Points
21383 Points (83%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2548 Points (100%)
min: 2382     avg: 2424     median: 2428 (95%)     max: 2450 Points
2559 Points (100%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
25682 Points (46%)
min: 15973     avg: 16458     median: 16532 (30%)     max: 16698 Points
23982 Points (43%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2176     avg: 2274     median: 2287 (10%)     max: 2316 Points
2445 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15903     avg: 16426     median: 16496 (52%)     max: 16773 Points
23387 Points (74%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9107     avg: 9430     median: 9433 (94%)     max: 9739 Points
10016 Points (100%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 64532     avg: 68455     median: 68610 (68%)     max: 70460 Points
100326 Points (100%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
382 ms (0%)
401 ms (0%)
377 ms (0%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
342 Points (94%)
337 Points (93%)
357 Points (98%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
387 Points (69%)
353 Points (63%)
409 Points (73%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2380 Points (89%)
min: 2210     avg: 2279     median: 2278.5 (85%)     max: 2347 Points
2451 Points (92%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
320 Watt (55%)
272 Watt (47%)
319 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
309 Watt (56%)
238 Watt (43%)
313 Watt (57%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
95.4 Watt (63%)
min: 87.4     avg: 106.3     median: 105.5 (70%)     max: 137.9 Watt
100 Watt (66%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
21.2 Points per Watt (16%)
15.3 Points per Watt (11%)
20.2 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D → 81% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 9950X → 98% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 18. 06:52:59

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18719 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18494 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 17637 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 16 May 2025 05:18:06 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18719 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 18719 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18494 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#11 got single benchmarks 18494 +0.032s ... 0.048s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17637 +0.003s ... 0.052s

#13 got single benchmarks 17637 +0.004s ... 0.055s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.069s ... 0.124s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.124s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)