Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 9800X3D

Der AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D ist ein High-End-Prozessor, der speziell für Gamer und anspruchsvolle Anwender entwickelt wurde. Er basiert auf der neuesten Zen-5-Architektur von AMD und wird im fortschrittlichen 4-nm-Verfahren gefertigt, was nicht nur höhere Effizienz, sondern auch eine bessere Leistung ermöglicht. Mit seinen 8 Kernen und 16 Threads bietet der 9800X3D eine solide Basis für rechenintensive Anwendungen.

Der größte Vorteil des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D ist die 3D V-Cache-Technologie, die komplett überarbeitet wurde und sich signifikant von den Modellen der 7000er-Serie unterscheidet. Die Änderungen resultieren in einer deutlich gesteigerten Taktfrequenz und einer besseren Wärmeverteilung. Der interne Aufbau besteht weiterhin aus einem I/O-Die sowie einem CCD. Letzterer beinhaltet die 8 Kerne sowie den 3D V-Cache und wird im 4nm-Prozess hergestellt. Beim I/O-Die hält AMD weiterhin am 6nm-Herstellungsprozess fest. Die Taktraten steigen im Vergleich zum Vorgängermodell spürbar. So beträgt der Basistakt 4,7 GH/z, wenngleich im Turbo bis zu 5,2 GH/s möglich sind.

Neben der überragenden Gaming-Performance überzeugt der AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D auch in produktiven Anwendungen. Während er speziell auf Spieleoptimierung ausgelegt ist, schneidet er in Anwendungen wie 3D-Modellierung, Videobearbeitung und anderen kreativen Workloads spürbar besser ab als ein AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Die Leistungsaufnahme des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D beträgt 120 Watt, welche als PPT maximal 162 Watt beträgt. Damit gibt es in diesem Punkt keine Änderungen im Vergleich zum AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Aufgrund gesteigerter Leistung kann die Effizienz des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D spürbar gesteigert werden. An die Effizienz der Arrow-Lake-Prozessoren kommt AMD allerdings trotz deutlich besserer Gaming-Leistung nicht heran.

Hier geht es zu unserem Test des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D.

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

The Ryzen 7 9700X is an upper mid-range desktop CPU of the Granite Ridge product family that features 8 Zen 5 cores (16 threads) running at 3.8 GHz to 5.5 GHz, PCIe 5 support and a basic iGPU. The Ryzen was launched in June 2024, with sales slated to start some time in July.

Architecture and Features

Just like Strix Point APUs, Granite Ridge processors make use of the new Zen 5 microarchitecture. However, there are no efficient cores here; all of 9700X's cores are full Zen 5 cores. Furthermore, Granite Ridge is a multi-die design with only the CPU cores produced using a fairly modern 4 nm TSMC process. Strix Point processors are a single-die design, from what we know.

According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the 9700X has 32 MB of L3 cache and 24 direct PCIe 5 lanes (3.93 GB/s throughput per lane) with up to 12 additional PCIe 4 lanes available depending on the motherboard. It supports DDR5 RAM as fast as 5600 MT/s, ECC memory included - this too depends on the motherboard.

The 9700X is unlocked for overclocking. Naturally, the AM5 socket CPU fully supports Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 as well as many Linux distros.

Performance

If early July leaks are any indication, the 9700X is set to have multi-thread performance matching the fastest laptop chips such as the 24-core Core i9-13950HX. We'll update this section once we get our hands on a system powered by the 9700X.

Graphics

The Radeon 610M comes equipped with just 128 unified shaders running at up to 2,200 MHz. Its gaming performance is slated to be extremely low and only just sufficient for pre-2020 games in resolutions such as 1024x768.

Power consumption

The CPU cores are built with a 4 nm TSMC process for good, as of mid 2024, power efficiency. (Apple is the leader in this regard with the second-generation 3 nm process.)

The Ryzen 7's long-term TDP is 65 W. It'll probably consume at least 100 W when under heavy short-term loads. If overclocked, the power consumption figures will increase significantly.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 9800X3DAMD Ryzen 7 9700X
CodenameGranite RidgeGranite Ridge
SeriesAMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)AMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)
Serie: Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5) Granite Ridge
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D compare4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X compare4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X compare4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D « 4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X compare3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D compare4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X compare4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X compare4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X « 3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X compare3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock4700 - 5200 MHz3800 - 5500 MHz
L1 Cache640 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache96 MB32 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 / 16
8 x 5.5 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP120 Watt65 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2162 Watt
Transistors9970 Million
Technology4 nm4 nm & 6 nm
Voltage1.28 - 1.31 (nominal), 1.4 (max) V
Die Size192.6 mm2
max. Temp.95 °C95 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)AM5
FeaturesDDR5-5600 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, EVP, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, SHA, XFR2DDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$479 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 9800X3D
47.4 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen 7 9700X
47.3 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
132 Points (74%)
136 Points (76%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1358 Points (25%)
1203 Points (22%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
23230 Points (22%)
20485 Points (19%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2080 Points (88%)
2211 Points (93%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
818 Points (89%)
870 Points (95%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
9057 Points (22%)
7956 Points (19%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3647 Points (23%)
3178 Points (20%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
328 Points (91%)
346 Points (96%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
41.7 Points (54%)
36.2 Points (47%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (91%)
min: 4.06     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (96%)     max: 4.21 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8933 Points (54%)
9457 Points (57%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60825 Points (44%)
57914 Points (42%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
119288 Points (76%)
108170 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
16618 Points (20%)
17765 Points (22%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
54.3 s (1%)
59.6 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.3 s (0%)
2.4 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
15574 Points (25%)
13549 Points (21%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 90226     avg: 90604     median: 90354 (52%)     max: 91233 MIPS
82553 MIPS (47%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 8346     avg: 8407     median: 8392 (99%)     max: 8484 MIPS
7894 MIPS (93%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
203 fps (68%)
176.1 fps (59%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
375.5 fps (87%)
376 fps (87%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
30.6 fps (54%)
26.4 fps (46%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.7 GB/s (50%)
1.7 GB/s (50%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.9 GB/s (50%)
2.8 GB/s (48%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
17.8 GB/s (46%)
16.1 GB/s (42%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
204 Seconds (3%)
244 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
137 Seconds (1%)
154 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.3 sec (7%)
0.3 sec (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 17855     avg: 18278     median: 18297 (39%)     max: 18804 Points
18794 Points (40%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
7.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.1 s (1%)
16.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
369.7 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 106182     avg: 108520     median: 108630 (83%)     max: 109721 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 34973     avg: 38178     median: 38658 (95%)     max: 40153 Points
30757 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 104270     avg: 105466     median: 105518 (86%)     max: 106627 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 104072     avg: 105382     median: 105475 (86%)     max: 106576 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 106846     avg: 108755     median: 108620 (90%)     max: 112948 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 28550     avg: 29199     median: 29219 (74%)     max: 29860 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 38742     avg: 39152     median: 39156.5 (70%)     max: 39893 Points
38088 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 14848     avg: 15718     median: 15756.5 (66%)     max: 16218 Points
14306 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 3213     avg: 3277     median: 3282 (82%)     max: 3337 Points
3373 Points (84%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 17704     avg: 18141     median: 18155.5 (70%)     max: 18574 Points
16817 Points (65%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2382     avg: 2424     median: 2428 (95%)     max: 2450 Points
2507 Points (98%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15973     avg: 16449     median: 16530 (30%)     max: 16698 Points
14613 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2176     avg: 2273     median: 2277 (10%)     max: 2316 Points
2402 Points (10%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 15903     avg: 16420     median: 16496 (52%)     max: 16773 Points
14698 Points (46%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9107     avg: 9433     median: 9442.5 (94%)     max: 9739 Points
9801 Points (98%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 64532     avg: 68389     median: 68376 (68%)     max: 70460 Points
59594 Points (59%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
401 ms (0%)
383 ms (0%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
337 Points (93%)
346 Points (95%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
353 Points (63%)
398 Points (71%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2210     avg: 2279     median: 2278.5 (85%)     max: 2347 Points
2174 Points (81%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
272 Watt (47%)
180.2 Watt (31%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
238 Watt (43%)
174.6 Watt (32%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 87.4     avg: 106.4     median: 105.5 (70%)     max: 137.9 Watt
83 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
15.3 Points per Watt (11%)
18.2 Points per Watt (14%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D → 100% n=46

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 9700X → 96% n=46

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 16. 02:14:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18494 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17989 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13 Jun 2025 05:19:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18494 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 18494 +0.036s ... 0.045s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17989 +0.003s ... 0.048s

#10 got single benchmarks 17989 +0.004s ... 0.052s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.061s ... 0.113s

#13 return log +0.005s ... 0.118s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)