Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-14900K vs Intel Core i7-14700 vs Intel Core i5-14500T

Intel Core i9-14900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-14900K

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a high-end processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, similar to the Intel Core i9-13900K last year. The base clock is 3.2 GHz and can reach up to 6 GHz under optimal conditions. The total of 32 threads are still divided into 8 P and 16 E cores. The 8 performance cores (P-cores) also offer hyperthreading, which means that a total of 32 threads can be processed simultaneously in conjunction with the 16 energy-efficient E-cores. As before, the K models continue to offer a freely selectable multiplier, which simplifies overclocking. The Intel Core i9-14900K uses the same CPU socket (LGA 1700) as the Intel Core i9-13900K. This means you don't necessarily need a new motherboard, as the 600 series chipsets support the new processors after a BIOS update. There is also still the option of using DDR4 for the RAM.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Core i9-14900K still offers 8 P-cores, which are relieved by 16 additional E-cores for demanding applications and thus ensure very high multi-thread performance. In comparison, however, the Intel Core i9-14900K can only gain a slight lead. The e-cores primarily take care of background applications. The hybrid architecture relies on the Intel Thread Director, which is responsible for the correct allocation of tasks. Meanwhile, the IPC could only be increased slightly. As an innovation with the Intel Core i9-14900K, the manufacturer is increasingly relying on AI, which is also used for overclocking. With one click in the Intel Extreme Utility, the tool checks the entire system and makes the necessary settings.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Intel Core i9-14900K offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The Intel Core i9-14900K is specified with a TDP of 125 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In Boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 253 watts (PL2). However, this requires very good cooling. Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the specified power consumption does not increase if the limits are adhered to. The situation is different if the limits are deactivated. As this value depends on the overall system, we cannot make an exact statement on this.

Intel Core i7-14700

► remove from comparison Intel i7-14700

The Intel Core i7-14700 is a desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which inherits the 13th generation of Intel Core processors with minor improvements. The processor offers a base clock of 1.5 GHz or 2.1 GHz and reaches up to 5.4 GHz in Turbo. The basic CPU structure remains unchanged. The Intel Core i7-14700 features 8 P-cores and 12 E-cores, allowing up to 28 threads to be processed in parallel. It is also based on the LGA 1700 socket, which was already introduced with Alder Lake.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i7-13700K, the Intel Core i7-14700 also has an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-14700 is 65 watts, with the option of consuming up to 219 watts in Turbo mode.

Intel Core i5-14500T

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-14500T is a power-efficient desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which was introduced in October 2022. The processor offers a base clock of 1.7 GHz and reaches up to 4.6 GHz in Turbo. The hybrid CPU architecture, which was introduced with Alder Lake, also benefits the Raptor Lake processors. The suffix T stands for a particularly economical CPU model and with a TDP of just 35 watts (PL1 = 35 watts), these processors are ideally suited to small, compact systems.

Performance

The low power consumption ultimately results in slightly lower performance compared to the Intel Core i5-14500. Depending on how the PL2 (92 watts) is defined, there may be noticeable differences in multi-core performance. Compared to the Intel Core i5-12500T, the Intel Core i5-14500T is superior due to the higher number of physical computing units. Compared to the Intel Core i5-13500T, there is no noticeable increase in performance due to the same number of computing units.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i5-13500T, the Intel Core i5-14500T offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, not much has changed with the new Intel UHD Graphics 770. The iGPU of the Intel Core i5-14500T also clocks 100 MHz higher, but this does not make a noticeable difference in everyday use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i5-14500T is 35 watts, with the option to increase this to up to 92 watts in Turbo mode. Compared to the Intel Core i5-13500T, nothing has changed in terms of power consumption.

ModelIntel Core i9-14900KIntel Core i7-14700Intel Core i5-14500T
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-RIntel Raptor Lake-RIntel Raptor Lake-R
Series: Raptor Lake-R Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-14900K « 3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-149002 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-147001.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-145002.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900K3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-149002 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700 « 1.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-145002.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900K3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-149002 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-147001.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-145002.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T « 1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock3200 - 6000 MHz1500 - 5400 MHz1700 - 4800 MHz
L2 Cache32 MB28 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache36 MB33 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 32
8 x 6.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
20 / 28
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
12 x 4.2 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
14 / 20
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP125 Watt65 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA 1700LGA 1700
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, max. 192 GB of DDR5 5600 MT/s or DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1600 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$589 U.S.$384 U.S.$232 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.intel.comwww.intel.de
TDP Turbo PL2219 Watt92 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900K
51.2 pt (85%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-14700
44.9 pt (75%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-14500T
37.9 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 134     avg: 136.5     median: 137 (77%)     max: 138 Points
123.4 Points (69%)
103 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 2112     avg: 2189     median: 2146.5 (40%)     max: 2352 Points
1243 Points (23%)
630 Points (12%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 37606     avg: 39400     median: 39399.5 (37%)     max: 41193 Points
28398 Points (26%)
11790 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2174     avg: 2263     median: 2262.5 (96%)     max: 2351 Points
2080 Points (88%)
1838 Points (78%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
900 Points (100%)
798 Points (88%)
706 Points (78%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
15466 Points (38%)
10501 Points (26%)
4319 Points (11%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5924     avg: 6103     median: 6103 (39%)     max: 6282 Points
4061 Points (26%)
2022 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 317     avg: 324.5     median: 324.5 (91%)     max: 332 Points
299 Points (84%)
252 Points (71%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
72.2 Points (93%)
21.6 Points (28%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 4.02     avg: 4     median: 4 (95%)     max: 4.21 Points
3.2 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
12643 Points (76%)
9014 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
94801 Points (69%)
39798 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
144156 Points (92%)
63443 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
18511 Points (23%)
14402 Points (18%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
74.5 s (1%)
221.3 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.1 s (0%)
4.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16108 Points (26%)
6846 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 145144     avg: 146282     median: 145207 (83%)     max: 149570 MIPS
102982 MIPS (59%)
45820 MIPS (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7772     avg: 7893     median: 7932 (93%)     max: 7934 MIPS
6845 MIPS (81%)
5980 MIPS (70%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 75.9     avg: 181.2     median: 181.2 (61%)     max: 286.5 fps
108.1 fps (36%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 257.5     avg: 345.5     median: 345.5 (80%)     max: 433.5 fps
264.5 fps (61%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 40.8     avg: 41.4     median: 41.1 (72%)     max: 42.8 fps
27.4 fps (48%)
12.7 fps (22%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.8 GB/s (82%)
1 GB/s (30%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
5.8 GB/s (100%)
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
26.7 GB/s (70%)
9.8 GB/s (26%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 135     avg: 143     median: 144.5 (2%)     max: 147 Seconds
214 Seconds (3%)
513 Seconds (7%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 80     avg: 84.6     median: 85 (1%)     max: 87 Seconds
123 Seconds (1%)
288 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3425     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.3504 sec
0.4 sec (8%)
0.4 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 20532     avg: 22354     median: 22657.5 (48%)     max: 22928 Points
12986 Points (28%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
5.5 s (1%)
7.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
12 s (1%)
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
280.3 s (1%)
408.8 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 11403     avg: 101267     median: 111512 (86%)     max: 114209 Points
54226 Points (42%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 28497     avg: 31204     median: 31391 (78%)     max: 32853 Points
24176 Points (60%)
15309 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 89084     avg: 104553     median: 105332 (86%)     max: 111347 Points
73013 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 88682     avg: 104672     median: 105402 (86%)     max: 110989 Points
72147 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 90865     avg: 104818     median: 105098 (87%)     max: 110670 Points
79337 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 27678     avg: 28978     median: 29112 (74%)     max: 30462 Points
22853 Points (58%)
14441 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 48193     avg: 52181     median: 52491 (94%)     max: 56087 Points
36871 Points (66%)
20354 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 19418     avg: 22303     median: 22579 (95%)     max: 23721 Points
14506 Points (61%)
8496 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 3108     avg: 3214     median: 3243 (81%)     max: 3294 Points
2876 Points (72%)
2546 Points (64%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 20435     avg: 21326     median: 21397 (83%)     max: 21790 Points
14072 Points (55%)
9225 Points (36%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2985     avg: 3078     median: 3104 (99%)     max: 3150 Points
2409 Points (76%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 19463     avg: 20452     median: 20693 (85%)     max: 20754 Points
8952 Points (37%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2243     avg: 2347     median: 2369 (93%)     max: 2370 Points
2057 Points (80%)
1838 Points (72%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24552     avg: 25148     median: 25199 (45%)     max: 25867 Points
15052 Points (27%)
9122 Points (16%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2177     avg: 2237     median: 2247 (10%)     max: 2280 Points
1782 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 23151     avg: 24582     median: 24467 (77%)     max: 25496 Points
8987 Points (28%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9620     avg: 9873     median: 9872.5 (99%)     max: 10009 Points
7611 Points (76%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 82660     avg: 87853     median: 88108.5 (88%)     max: 91119 Points
33122 Points (33%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 413     avg: 415     median: 414 (0%)     max: 418 ms
454 ms (1%)
554 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 332     avg: 334.7     median: 334 (92%)     max: 338 Points
300 Points (82%)
244 Points (67%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 371     avg: 388.3     median: 386 (69%)     max: 410 Points
350 Points (63%)
262 Points (47%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2490     avg: 2566     median: 2584 (97%)     max: 2611 Points
2048 Points (77%)
1493 Points (56%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
537 Watt (93%)
213 Watt (37%)
59.1 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
548 Watt (100%)
199.6 Watt (36%)
79.8 Watt (15%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 67.4     avg: 84.2     median: 77.6 (51%)     max: 151.2 Watt
35.3 Watt (23%)
8 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
11.5 Points per Watt (9%)
20.3 Points per Watt (15%)
25.3 Points per Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900K → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-14700 → 78% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-14500T → 53% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 26. 12:44:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15092 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18635 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18026 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Apr 2025 05:16:04 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15092 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 15092 +0.047s ... 0.055s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18635 +0.002s ... 0.056s

#11 got single benchmarks 18635 +0s ... 0.057s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18026 +0.001s ... 0.058s

#13 got single benchmarks 18026 +0s ... 0.058s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.062s ... 0.121s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.121s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)