Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-14900 vs Intel Core i5-14500 vs Intel Core i7-14700K

Intel Core i9-14900

► remove from comparison Intel i9-14900

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a high-end processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture. The base clock is 2 GHz and can reach up to 5.8 GHz under optimal conditions. Similar to the top model (Intel Core i9-14900K), the total of 32 threads are divided into 8 p- and 16 e-cores. The 8 performance cores (p-cores) also offer hyperthreading, which means that a total of 32 threads can be processed simultaneously. The non-K model is an economical processor. There is still the option of DDR4 or DDR5 memory.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i9-14900K, the Core i9-14900 offers the same number of physical computing units. However, due to the lower power consumption, the Intel Core i9-14900 delivers slightly less performance. The intended use is primarily for compact PCs with limited cooling options.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i9-14900K, the Intel Core i9-14900 offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The Intel Core i9-14900 is specified with a TDP of 65 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 219 watts (PL2). However, this requires very good cooling. Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900, the specified power consumption has not changed.

Intel Core i5-14500

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-14500 is a fast and relative efficient desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which was introduced in 2022. The processor offers a base clock of 2.6 GHz and reaches up to 5.0 GHz in Turbo. The hybrid CPU architecture introduced with Alder Lake is also used in the Raptor Lake processors. Compared to the Intel Core i5-13500, however, the Intel Core i5-14500 only offers a slight advantage. The number of cores is identical and Intel has only minimally increased the clock rates of the P and E cores in the Core i5-14500.

Performance

Due to the same number of physical computing units, the Intel Core i5-14500 only offers a minimal difference in performance compared to the Intel Core i5-13500, which is only due to the increased clock rates. Compared to the even older Intel Core i5-12500, which has to make do completely without E-cores, the performance difference is significantly higher.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i5-13500, the Intel Core i5-14500 offers an integrated graphics unit. The already widespread Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, nothing has changed with the new Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i5-14500 is 65 watts, with the option to increase this to up to 154 watts in Turbo mode. Compared to the Intel Core i5-13500, Intel has not made any changes to the TDP limits.

Intel Core i7-14700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-14700K

The Intel Core i7-14700K is a desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which inherits the 13th generation of Intel Core processors with minor improvements. The processor offers a base clock of 2.5 GHz or 3.4 GHz and reaches up to 5.6 GHz in Turbo. The basic CPU structure remains unchanged. The Intel Core i7-14700K features 8 P-cores and 12 E-cores, allowing up to 28 threads to be processed in parallel. The Intel Core i7-14700K still offers a freely selectable multiplier, which makes overclocking much easier. It is also based on the LGA 1700 socket, which was already introduced with Alder Lake.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-13700K, the IPC of the new Core i7-14700K has only been increased slightly. This means that the difference in performance is only due to the higher number of efficiency cores (12 vs. 8) and higher clock rates.


Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i7-13700K, the Intel Core i7-14700K also has an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-14700K is 125 Watts, with the option of consuming up to 253 watts in Turbo mode.

ModelIntel Core i9-14900Intel Core i5-14500Intel Core i7-14700K
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-RIntel Raptor Lake-RIntel Raptor Lake-R
Series: Raptor Lake-R Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-14900K3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900 « 2 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-147001.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-145002.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900K3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-149002 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-147001.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500 « 2.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900K3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K « 2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-149002 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-147001.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-145002.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock2000 - 5800 MHz2600 - 5000 MHz2500 - 5600 MHz
L2 Cache32 MB11.5 MB28 MB
L3 Cache36 MB24 MB33 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 32
8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
14 / 20
6 x 5.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
20 / 28
8 x 5.6 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
12 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP65 Watt65 Watt125 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2219 Watt154 Watt253 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA 1700LGA 1700
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$549 U.S.$409 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.dewww.intel.deark.intel.com
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900
47.2 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-14500
39.9 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-14700K
47.6 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
129 Points (72%)
114 Points (64%)
min: 126     avg: 127     median: 127 (71%)     max: 127.9 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1245 Points (23%)
799 Points (15%)
min: 1559     avg: 1771     median: 1770.5 (33%)     max: 1982 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
31070 Points (29%)
15012 Points (14%)
min: 30989     avg: 33441     median: 33440.5 (31%)     max: 35892 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2212 Points (94%)
1917 Points (81%)
min: 2153     avg: 2160     median: 2160 (92%)     max: 2167 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
846 Points (94%)
736 Points (82%)
min: 832     avg: 836     median: 836 (93%)     max: 840 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
11291 Points (28%)
5811 Points (14%)
min: 11814     avg: 12743     median: 12743 (31%)     max: 13672 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4793 Points (30%)
2435 Points (15%)
min: 4611     avg: 5035     median: 5035 (32%)     max: 5459 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
315 Points (88%)
273 Points (77%)
min: 313     avg: 313.5     median: 313.5 (88%)     max: 314 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
56.6 Points (73%)
28.8 Points (37%)
min: 54.22     avg: 57.8     median: 57.8 (75%)     max: 61.44 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.8 Points (90%)
3.3 Points (79%)
min: 3.7     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (89%)     max: 3.77 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
12284 Points (74%)
9388 Points (57%)
min: 11745     avg: 11886     median: 11886 (72%)     max: 12027 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
82492 Points (60%)
52699 Points (38%)
min: 91081     avg: 91124     median: 91123.5 (66%)     max: 91166 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
121768 Points (78%)
82201 Points (52%)
min: 124651     avg: 130357     median: 130356 (83%)     max: 136062 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17590 Points (21%)
15313 Points (19%)
min: 17400     avg: 17429     median: 17429 (21%)     max: 17458 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
85.6 s (1%)
192.2 s (2%)
min: 50.891     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (1%)     max: 109.801 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
3.7 s (1%)
min: 2.147     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (0%)     max: 2.252 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
12359 Points (20%)
7912 Points (13%)
min: 12800     avg: 12813     median: 12812.5 (20%)     max: 12825 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
101652 MIPS (58%)
54851 MIPS (31%)
min: 117224     avg: 126436     median: 126436 (73%)     max: 135648 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
7276 MIPS (86%)
6198 MIPS (73%)
min: 7040     avg: 7196     median: 7195.5 (85%)     max: 7351 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
222 fps (74%)
138.1 fps (46%)
min: 225.5     avg: 243.3     median: 243.3 (81%)     max: 261 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
358.5 fps (83%)
318 fps (73%)
min: 393.5     avg: 406.3     median: 406.3 (94%)     max: 419 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
31.6 fps (56%)
16.4 fps (29%)
min: 32.3     avg: 34.6     median: 34.6 (61%)     max: 36.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.4 GB/s (71%)
1.4 GB/s (41%)
min: 2.2     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (71%)     max: 2.6 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
4.9 GB/s (84%)
2.5 GB/s (43%)
min: 4.4     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (78%)     max: 4.6 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
18.5 GB/s (48%)
12.4 GB/s (32%)
min: 18     avg: 21.8     median: 21.8 (57%)     max: 25.6 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
263 Seconds (3%)
396 Seconds (5%)
min: 155     avg: 181.5     median: 181.5 (2%)     max: 208 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
131 Seconds (1%)
223 Seconds (2%)
min: 91     avg: 100     median: 100 (1%)     max: 109 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (8%)
0.4 sec (9%)
min: 0.3788     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3826 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
18728 Points (40%)
15233 Points (32%)
min: 11741     avg: 16203     median: 16203 (34%)     max: 20665 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
5.8 s (1%)
7.4 s (2%)
min: 5.953     avg: 6     median: 6 (1%)     max: 5.98 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
12.6 s (1%)
16.5 s (1%)
min: 12.844     avg: 12.9     median: 12.9 (1%)     max: 12.894 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
303.4 s (1%)
396.9 s (2%)
min: 305.942     avg: 311     median: 311 (1%)     max: 316.148 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
93183 Points (72%)
68578 Points (53%)
96298 Points (74%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
28622 Points (71%)
18692 Points (47%)
min: 28739     avg: 30538     median: 30537.5 (76%)     max: 32336 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
88787 Points (72%)
85785 Points (70%)
82048 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
90442 Points (73%)
87832 Points (71%)
81495 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
93001 Points (77%)
99473 Points (83%)
85692 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
20179 Points (51%)
17752 Points (45%)
23358 Points (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
42316 Points (75%)
24708 Points (44%)
min: 40312     avg: 44727     median: 44727 (80%)     max: 49142 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
19492 Points (82%)
9657 Points (41%)
min: 15951     avg: 18746     median: 18746 (79%)     max: 21541 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
3022 Points (75%)
2583 Points (65%)
min: 2902     avg: 2922     median: 2922 (73%)     max: 2942 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
15962 Points (62%)
10644 Points (41%)
min: 18504     avg: 19147     median: 19147 (74%)     max: 19790 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
2497 Points (79%)
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
10295 Points (42%)
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2140 Points (84%)
1898 Points (74%)
min: 2092     avg: 2107     median: 2106.5 (82%)     max: 2121 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
17395 Points (31%)
10543 Points (19%)
min: 19971     avg: 21565     median: 21565 (39%)     max: 23159 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2077 Points (9%)
1842 Points (8%)
min: 2039     avg: 2042     median: 2042 (9%)     max: 2045 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
17218 Points (54%)
10477 Points (33%)
min: 19766     avg: 21261     median: 21261 (67%)     max: 22756 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9143 Points (91%)
7873 Points (79%)
min: 8874     avg: 9089     median: 9089 (91%)     max: 9304 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
67178 Points (67%)
40233 Points (40%)
min: 72062     avg: 75782     median: 75781.5 (76%)     max: 79501 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
436 ms (1%)
506 ms (1%)
min: 439     avg: 439.5     median: 439.5 (1%)     max: 440 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
262 Points (72%)
min: 303     avg: 308.5     median: 308.5 (85%)     max: 314 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
315 Points (57%)
278 Points (50%)
min: 311     avg: 325     median: 325 (58%)     max: 339 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2133 Points (80%)
1625 Points (61%)
min: 2194     avg: 2241     median: 2241 (84%)     max: 2288 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
145.5 Watt (25%)
95.1 Watt (16%)
min: 191.9     avg: 296     median: 296 (51%)     max: 400 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
253 Watt (46%)
118.7 Watt (22%)
min: 287     avg: 357.5     median: 357.5 (65%)     max: 428 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
29.9 Watt (20%)
8.9 Watt (6%)
min: 22.4     avg: 63.6     median: 63.6 (42%)     max: 104.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
18.9 Points per Watt (14%)
20.5 Points per Watt (15%)
min: 12.8     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (11%)     max: 16.1 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900 → 100% n=53

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-14500 → 72% n=53

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-14700K → 106% n=53

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 26. 22:28:15

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18150 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18025 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 16391 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Apr 2025 05:16:04 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18150 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#9 got single benchmarks 18150 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18025 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#11 got single benchmarks 18025 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16391 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#13 got single benchmarks 16391 +0.006s ... 0.023s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.063s ... 0.086s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.087s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)