Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-13900K vs Intel Core i7-13700K vs Intel Core i5-13500T

Intel Core i9-13900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900K

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a fast high-end desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3 - 5.8 GHz and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.2 - 4.3 GHz.

Thanks to the faster P-cores and more E-cores, the i9-13900K is significantly faster than the old i9-12900K (especially in multi-threaded workloads). Compared to the Raphael AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (Zen 4), the 13900K offers a slightly higher multi-thread-performance and a slightly lower single core performance. In games, the Intel CPU is currently the clear winner (at the time of announcement of the 7950X).

The 13900K is rated at 125 Watt TDP base power (PL1) and 253 Watt Turbo Power (PL2) and therefore slightly higher than the old i9-12900K.

Intel Core i7-13700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13700K

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a high-end CPU based on the current Raptor Lake architecture, which was introduced in September 2022. The base clock is 3.4 GHz and can reach up to 5.4 GHz under optimal conditions. The total of 16 cores are divided into 8 P-cores and 8 E-cores, which we already know from the Alder Lake architecture. Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700K, however, the number of E-cores has been doubled, meaning that the Intel Core i7-13700K now offers 24 threads. As usual, the K models continue to offer a freely selectable multiplier, which simplifies overclocking. In addition, all new Raptor Lake processors can be operated on the existing Socket 1700 motherboards.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700K, the Core i7-13700K still offers 8 P-cores, but these are to be relieved by 8 additional E-cores for demanding applications. The E-cores primarily take care of background applications. The hybrid architecture relies on the Intel Thread Director, which is responsible for the correct allocation of tasks. Compared to Alder Lake, the number of e-cores has been doubled, which significantly improves multi-thread performance in combination with a further increase in IPC. If all requirements are met, Intel Turbo Boost 3.0 can increase the clock rate of the P-cores to up to 5.4 GHz. The E-cores can also be overclocked and reach a maximum of 3.4 GHz.

Graphics

Like the Intel Core i7-12700K, the Intel Core i7-13700K offers an integrated graphics unit (iGPU). The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, not much has changed with the new Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power Consumption

The Intel Core i7-13700K is specified with a TDP of 125 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In Boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 253 watts (PL2). However, this requires good cooling. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value is not restricted by a Tau value.

Intel Core i5-13500T

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-13500T is a fast and very economical desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which was introduced in October 2022. The processor offers a base clock of 1.6 GHz and reaches up to 4.6 GHz in Turbo. The hybrid CPU architecture, which was introduced with Alder Lake, also benefits the Raptor Lake processors. The suffix T stands for a particularly economical CPU model, and with a TDP of just 35 watts (PL1 = 35 watts), these processors are ideally suited for small, compact systems.

Performance

The low power consumption ultimately results in slightly lower performance compared to the Intel Core i5-13500. Depending on how the PL2 (92 watts) is defined, there may be noticeable differences in multi-core performance. Compared to the Intel Core i5-12500T, the Intel Core i5-13500T is superior due to the higher number of physical computing units.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i5-12500T, the Intel Core i5-13500T offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, not much has changed with the new Intel UHD Graphics 770. The iGPU of the Intel Core i5-13500T also clocks 100 MHz higher, but this does not make a noticeable difference in everyday use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i5-13500T is 35 watts, with the option to increase this to up to 92 watts in Turbo mode. Compared to the Intel Core i5-12500T (PL2 = 74 watts), the maximum possible energy requirement increases slightly.

ModelIntel Core i9-13900KIntel Core i7-13700KIntel Core i5-13500T
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-S
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900K « 3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K « 3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T « 1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock3000 - 5800 MHz3400 - 5400 MHz1600 - 4600 MHz
L2 Cache32 MB24 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache36 MB30 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 32
8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
16 / 24
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
14 / 20
6 x 4.6 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 3.2 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP125 Watt125 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2257 mm2215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA 1700LGA 1700
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1600 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$589 U.S.$409 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.intel.de
TDP Turbo PL292 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900K
49 pt (82%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13700K
46.1 pt (77%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500T
37 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
104 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
577 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 32592     avg: 37310     median: 38271.5 (36%)     max: 40103 Points
min: 30737     avg: 30745     median: 30745 (29%)     max: 30753 Points
11028 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2203     avg: 2238     median: 2238.5 (95%)     max: 2272 Points
min: 2114     avg: 2116     median: 2116 (90%)     max: 2118 Points
1754 Points (75%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 828     avg: 849     median: 849.5 (94%)     max: 870 Points
min: 808     avg: 812     median: 811.5 (90%)     max: 815 Points
669 Points (74%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 13415     avg: 14459     median: 14620.5 (36%)     max: 15181 Points
min: 11685     avg: 11714     median: 11713.5 (29%)     max: 11742 Points
4246 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 5321     avg: 5798     median: 5805.5 (37%)     max: 6191 Points
min: 4438     avg: 4508     median: 4507.5 (28%)     max: 4577 Points
1945 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 299     avg: 314.1     median: 318 (89%)     max: 328 Points
303 Points (85%)
247 Points (69%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 62.2     avg: 67     median: 67.5 (87%)     max: 70.78 Points
53 Points (69%)
21.3 Points (28%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (92%)     max: 3.93 Points
3.7 Points (87%)
3.1 Points (72%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11661     avg: 11989     median: 12017.5 (73%)     max: 12259 Points
11278 Points (68%)
8693 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 85342     avg: 88253     median: 87738 (64%)     max: 92192 Points
85748 Points (62%)
40528 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 132000     avg: 134526     median: 133567 (85%)     max: 138969 Points
135499 Points (87%)
62808 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 17418     avg: 17943     median: 17998.5 (22%)     max: 18355 Points
17002 Points (21%)
14147 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 79.738     avg: 84.6     median: 84.2 (1%)     max: 90.13 s
170.2 s (2%)
133.3 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 1.818     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2.305 s
2.3 s (0%)
4.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 13210     avg: 14265     median: 14271 (23%)     max: 15309 Points
12835 Points (20%)
6683 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 127201     avg: 142777     median: 146984 (84%)     max: 148053 MIPS
min: 110420     avg: 111390     median: 111390 (64%)     max: 112359 MIPS
40034 MIPS (23%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7176     avg: 7343     median: 7272 (86%)     max: 7539 MIPS
min: 7061     avg: 7062     median: 7061.5 (83%)     max: 7062 MIPS
5840 MIPS (69%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 247.5     avg: 261.5     median: 264.8 (89%)     max: 269 fps
232 fps (78%)
100.5 fps (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 412     avg: 419     median: 419.3 (97%)     max: 425.5 fps
406 fps (94%)
259.5 fps (60%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 34.5     avg: 39.9     median: 40.7 (72%)     max: 42.6 fps
min: 33.7     avg: 33.9     median: 33.9 (59%)     max: 34 fps
12.1 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 2.6     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (85%)     max: 3 GB/s
2.2 GB/s (65%)
1 GB/s (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 5.2     avg: 5.4     median: 5.4 (93%)     max: 5.4 GB/s
4 GB/s (69%)
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 20.5     avg: 23.3     median: 22.9 (60%)     max: 27 GB/s
15.8 GB/s (41%)
8.2 GB/s (21%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 136     avg: 145.2     median: 140.5 (2%)     max: 174 Seconds
min: 174     avg: 176.5     median: 176.5 (2%)     max: 179 Seconds
533 Seconds (7%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 80     avg: 85.7     median: 84 (1%)     max: 101 Seconds
min: 106     avg: 108     median: 108 (1%)     max: 110 Seconds
291 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3468     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3911 sec
min: 0.3855     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3899 sec
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 19989     avg: 20578     median: 20192 (43%)     max: 21934 Points
18153 Points (39%)
12818 Points (27%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 5.655     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 5.86 s
6.2 s (1%)
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 12.287     avg: 12.6     median: 12.5 (1%)     max: 13.193 s
13.2 s (1%)
17.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 289.628     avg: 296.6     median: 293.3 (1%)     max: 310.125 s
317.8 s (1%)
430.1 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 86915     avg: 97290     median: 96473 (74%)     max: 112434 Points
85363 Points (66%)
54029 Points (42%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 29023     avg: 31289     median: 31187.5 (78%)     max: 33181 Points
31214 Points (78%)
12162 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 79257     avg: 97847     median: 97246.5 (79%)     max: 111988 Points
99898 Points (81%)
70975 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 80320     avg: 96904     median: 97919.5 (79%)     max: 102987 Points
99878 Points (81%)
69547 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83056     avg: 98634     median: 97311 (81%)     max: 105981 Points
103719 Points (86%)
77848 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 26626     avg: 29034     median: 29044.5 (73%)     max: 30955 Points
28204 Points (71%)
13665 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 46013     avg: 51456     median: 51140 (91%)     max: 54226 Points
45127 Points (80%)
18673 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 16236     avg: 20507     median: 20037 (84%)     max: 22794 Points
18897 Points (80%)
6210 Points (26%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
3070 Points (77%)
2962 Points (74%)
2393 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
20800 Points (81%)
19249 Points (75%)
7327 Points (28%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2106     avg: 2237     median: 2286 (89%)     max: 2290 Points
min: 2081     avg: 2110     median: 2110 (82%)     max: 2139 Points
1716 Points (67%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22448     avg: 23743     median: 24033 (43%)     max: 24157 Points
min: 19719     avg: 20191     median: 20190.5 (36%)     max: 20662 Points
7377 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2148     avg: 2191     median: 2197 (10%)     max: 2246 Points
2064 Points (9%)
1685 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 22024     avg: 23446     median: 23664 (75%)     max: 24021 Points
19217 Points (61%)
7316 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9218     avg: 9542     median: 9598 (96%)     max: 9683 Points
8955 Points (89%)
7069 Points (71%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 77347     avg: 84105     median: 85336 (85%)     max: 86695 Points
69210 Points (69%)
29164 Points (29%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 423     avg: 430.6     median: 432 (1%)     max: 438 ms
min: 444     avg: 445.7     median: 444 (1%)     max: 449 ms
562 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 304     avg: 317.6     median: 316 (87%)     max: 335 Points
301 Points (83%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 338     avg: 364     median: 368 (66%)     max: 382 Points
348 Points (62%)
254 Points (46%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2263     avg: 2497     median: 2580 (96%)     max: 2589 Points
2325 Points (87%)
1324 Points (50%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 228     avg: 354.3     median: 359 (62%)     max: 471 Watt
357 Watt (62%)
55.6 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 349     avg: 392.5     median: 370.5 (68%)     max: 480 Watt
357 Watt (65%)
79.3 Watt (14%)
83.7 Watt (55%)
1098%
1 i5-13500T +
8.6 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 12.9     avg: 15     median: 15.2 (11%)     max: 16.8 Points per Watt
21.9 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900K → 100% n=49

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13700K → 89% n=49

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500T → 54% n=49

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 15. 22:36:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14625 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14998 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 17902 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 13 May 2025 05:18:04 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14625 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 14625 +0.021s ... 0.03s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14998 +0.004s ... 0.034s

#11 got single benchmarks 14998 +0.005s ... 0.039s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17902 +0.004s ... 0.043s

#13 got single benchmarks 17902 +0.004s ... 0.048s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.078s ... 0.126s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.126s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)