Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-8750H vs Intel Xeon E-2276M

Intel Core i7-8750H

► remove from comparison Intel i7-8750H

The Intel Core i7-8750H is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture and will be announced early 2018. The processor clocks at between 2.2 and 4.1 GHz (4 GHz with 4 cores, 3.9 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

Due to the two additional cores, performance has increased by almost 50% compared to a similar clocked Kaby Lake processor like the Core i7-7820HQ (2.9 - 3.9 GHz). Single-core performance has not improved since its Kaby Lake predecessor. As a high-end model, the i7-8850H is suitable for the most demanding applications and games.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 630 iGPU is supposed to offer a slightly higher performance as its clock rate has been increased by 50 MHz (rumored). The architecture is identical to that of the Intel HD Graphics 630. We do expect a performance improvement, but as a low-end solution it will probably only display current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Xeon E-2276M

► remove from comparison Intel E-2276M

The Intel Xeon E-2276M is a high-end processor for professional laptops with six cores based on the Coffee Lake architecture. The processor clocks at between 2.8 - 4.7 GHz and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading / SMT. According to Intel, the CPU is manufactured in an improved 14nm (14nm++) process. Compared to the similar consumer Core i7-9850H, the mobile Xeon offers support for ECC main memory and clocks 100-200 MHz higher.

The Coffee Lake architecture is similar to Kaby Lake and differs only in the amount of cores (now six cores for the high end versions) and the improved 14nm process (14nm++ according to Intel).

Performance

The Xeon E-2276M is a high end processor in 2019 and therefore well suited for all tasks. Thanks to the high Turbo Boost, the single core performance is also very good. Long term performance however is very depending on good cooling and proper TDP settings and differs therefore for each laptop.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is the same as the old Intel HD Graphics P630 and the only difference to the UHD Graphics 630 in the consumer models are the professional drivers.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the Xeon is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions.

show full text
ModelIntel Core i7-8750HIntel Xeon E-2276M
CodenameCoffee Lake-HCoffee Lake-H
SeriesIntel Coffee LakeIntel Coffee Lake
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-H
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H « 2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9980HK compare2.4 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-9880H compare2.3 - 4.8 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-8950HK compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2186M compare2.9 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2276M « 2.8 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9850H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-9750H compare2.6 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon E-2176M compare2.7 - 4.4 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8850H compare2.6 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i7-8750H2.2 - 4.1 GHz6 / 12 cores9 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9400H compare2.5 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300HF compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-9300H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8400H compare2.5 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-8300H compare2.3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-8100H compare3 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Clock2200 - 4100 MHz2800 - 4700 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache9 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 126 / 12
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFCBGA1440
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics P630 (350 - 1200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8750H
28.7 pt (48%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -92%
...
Intel Core i5-9300H
28.2 -2%
Intel Core i5-1038NG7
28.3 -1%
Intel Core i5-10200H
28.3 -1%
Intel Core i7-8665U
28.4 -1%
Intel Core i7-10810U
28.4 -1%
Intel Core i7-10610U
28.5 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 4680U
28.5 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
28.5 -1%
Intel Core i7-10510U
28.6 0%
Intel Core i7-8750H
28.7
AMD Ryzen 5 4600U
28.8 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
28.9 1%
Intel Core i3-1115G4
29.1 1%
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
29.2 2%
Intel Core i7-10710U
29.2 2%
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
29.3 2%
Intel Core i7-8850H
29.4 2%
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
29.5 3%
Intel Core i5-10300H
29.7 3%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50 74%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 109%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - E-2276M
31.3 pt (52%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -93%
...
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
30.7 -2%
Intel Core i5-1145G7
30.8 -2%
Intel Core i5-11300H
30.8 -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100
30.9 -1%
Intel Core i9-9880H
30.9 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
31 -1%
Intel Core i7-10750H
31.2 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 5560U
31.2 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
31.2 0%
Intel Xeon E-2276M
31.3
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
31.4 0%
Intel Core Ultra 5 134U
31.6 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
31.6 1%
Intel Core i5-1155G7
31.7 1%
Intel Core i7-10850H
31.7 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
31.8 2%
Intel Core Ultra 5 115U
32 2%
Intel Core i7-10870H
32.1 3%
Intel Core i5-11320H
32.1 3%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50 60%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 92%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 403     avg: 411.8     median: 412.5 (46%)     max: 418 Points
484 Points (54%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2142     avg: 2377     median: 2336.5 (6%)     max: 2707 Points
min: 2700     avg: 2783     median: 2782.5 (7%)     max: 2865 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 863     avg: 1113     median: 1116 (7%)     max: 1251 Points
min: 1205     avg: 1243     median: 1242.5 (8%)     max: 1280 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 163     avg: 172     median: 173 (49%)     max: 177 Points
min: 189     avg: 195     median: 195 (55%)     max: 201 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 9.54     avg: 12.2     median: 12.3 (16%)     max: 13.54 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.89     avg: 2     median: 2 (47%)     max: 2 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6236     avg: 6479     median: 6471 (39%)     max: 6645 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 29664     avg: 33163     median: 33595 (24%)     max: 35307 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 33944     avg: 42290     median: 43494 (28%)     max: 46384 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 8472     avg: 8542     median: 8498 (10%)     max: 8665 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 125.5     avg: 157.5     median: 156.8 (2%)     max: 180.5 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 4.35     avg: 7.1     median: 5.5 (1%)     max: 16.26 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5310 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 28826     avg: 30674     median: 31144 (18%)     max: 33257 MIPS
33994 MIPS (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4599     avg: 4621     median: 4629 (55%)     max: 4630 MIPS
5214 MIPS (61%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 64.2     avg: 67.2     median: 67.2 (22%)     max: 70.2 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 193.5     avg: 200.3     median: 200.3 (46%)     max: 207.1 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.56     avg: 8.2     median: 7.8 (14%)     max: 9.55 fps
9.7 fps (17%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.7 GB/s (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.2 GB/s (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7 GB/s (18%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 395.5     avg: 456.2     median: 469.3 (3%)     max: 485.9 Seconds
384 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 E-2276M +
0.6 sec (13%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 7531     avg: 10078     median: 10294.5 (22%)     max: 10832 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 8.98     avg: 9.3     median: 9.3 (2%)     max: 9.45 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 20.26     avg: 21     median: 21.1 (1%)     max: 21.39 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 509     avg: 524     median: 524 (2%)     max: 537 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 27882     avg: 36281     median: 37117 (29%)     max: 41516 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7869     avg: 11044     median: 11474.5 (29%)     max: 13112 Points
min: 12006     avg: 12568     median: 12568 (31%)     max: 13130 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 43026     avg: 55905     median: 56773 (46%)     max: 58897 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 51146     avg: 56438     median: 56720 (46%)     max: 58704 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 55371     avg: 57714     median: 57465.5 (48%)     max: 60233 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 4876     avg: 9924     median: 10149 (26%)     max: 11320 Points
10449 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8551     avg: 15199     median: 15533 (28%)     max: 17219 Points
16082 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2859     avg: 5724     median: 5858 (25%)     max: 7037 Points
6343 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1050 Points (41%)
1303 Points (51%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
4820 Points (9%)
6595 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4669     avg: 4982     median: 5040 (50%)     max: 5146 Points
5218 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17709     avg: 21069     median: 21648 (22%)     max: 23313 Points
24150 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4548     avg: 4839     median: 4868.5 (63%)     max: 4997 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 17048     avg: 19665     median: 19875 (43%)     max: 22006 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 20725     avg: 21871     median: 21920 (39%)     max: 22665 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 3734     avg: 3995     median: 4008 (78%)     max: 4163 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 695     avg: 1108     median: 1124 (1%)     max: 1272 ms
784 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 77.5     avg: 82.3     median: 83 (1%)     max: 85.8 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 27460     avg: 34108     median: 34163 (26%)     max: 44549 Points
56114 Points (43%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
213 Points (38%)
220 Points (39%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 0     avg: 67.1     median: 90.4 (16%)     max: 111 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 97     avg: 109.5     median: 109.5 (20%)     max: 122 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 8.19     avg: 21     median: 12.6 (9%)     max: 42.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8750H → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon E-2276M → 118% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 25. 16:46:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9576 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11549 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Apr 2025 05:16:04 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9576 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 9576 +0.108s ... 0.117s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11549 +0.004s ... 0.121s

#10 got single benchmarks 11549 +0.005s ... 0.126s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.126s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.042s ... 0.168s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.171s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)