Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-14700K vs Intel Core i9-14900K

Intel Core i7-14700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-14700K

The Intel Core i7-14700K is a desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which inherits the 13th generation of Intel Core processors with minor improvements. The processor offers a base clock of 2.5 GHz or 3.4 GHz and reaches up to 5.6 GHz in Turbo. The basic CPU structure remains unchanged. The Intel Core i7-14700K features 8 P-cores and 12 E-cores, allowing up to 28 threads to be processed in parallel. The Intel Core i7-14700K still offers a freely selectable multiplier, which makes overclocking much easier. It is also based on the LGA 1700 socket, which was already introduced with Alder Lake.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-13700K, the IPC of the new Core i7-14700K has only been increased slightly. This means that the difference in performance is only due to the higher number of efficiency cores (12 vs. 8) and higher clock rates.


Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i7-13700K, the Intel Core i7-14700K also has an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i7-14700K is 125 Watts, with the option of consuming up to 253 watts in Turbo mode.

Intel Core i9-14900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-14900K

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a high-end processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, similar to the Intel Core i9-13900K last year. The base clock is 3.2 GHz and can reach up to 6 GHz under optimal conditions. The total of 32 threads are still divided into 8 P and 16 E cores. The 8 performance cores (P-cores) also offer hyperthreading, which means that a total of 32 threads can be processed simultaneously in conjunction with the 16 energy-efficient E-cores. As before, the K models continue to offer a freely selectable multiplier, which simplifies overclocking. The Intel Core i9-14900K uses the same CPU socket (LGA 1700) as the Intel Core i9-13900K. This means you don't necessarily need a new motherboard, as the 600 series chipsets support the new processors after a BIOS update. There is also still the option of using DDR4 for the RAM.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Core i9-14900K still offers 8 P-cores, which are relieved by 16 additional E-cores for demanding applications and thus ensure very high multi-thread performance. In comparison, however, the Intel Core i9-14900K can only gain a slight lead. The e-cores primarily take care of background applications. The hybrid architecture relies on the Intel Thread Director, which is responsible for the correct allocation of tasks. Meanwhile, the IPC could only be increased slightly. As an innovation with the Intel Core i9-14900K, the manufacturer is increasingly relying on AI, which is also used for overclocking. With one click in the Intel Extreme Utility, the tool checks the entire system and makes the necessary settings.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i9-13900K, the Intel Core i9-14900K offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, nothing has changed with the Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power consumption

The Intel Core i9-14900K is specified with a TDP of 125 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In Boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 253 watts (PL2). However, this requires very good cooling. Compared to the Intel Core i9-13900K, the specified power consumption does not increase if the limits are adhered to. The situation is different if the limits are deactivated. As this value depends on the overall system, we cannot make an exact statement on this.

ModelIntel Core i7-14700KIntel Core i9-14900K
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-RIntel Raptor Lake-R
Series: Raptor Lake-R Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-14900K3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K « 2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900 compare2 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700 compare1.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500 compare2.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T compare1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900K « 3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i9-14900 compare2 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700 compare1.5 - 5.4 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K compare3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500 compare2.6 - 5 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14500T compare1.7 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock2500 - 5600 MHz3200 - 6000 MHz
L2 Cache28 MB32 MB
L3 Cache33 MB36 MB
Cores / Threads20 / 28
8 x 5.6 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
12 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
24 / 32
8 x 6.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP125 Watt125 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2253 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA 1700
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1600 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$409 U.S.$589 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Die Size257 mm2

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-14700K
47.6 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-14900K
51.2 pt (85%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 126     avg: 127     median: 127 (71%)     max: 127.9 Points
min: 134     avg: 136.5     median: 137 (77%)     max: 138 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1559     avg: 1771     median: 1770.5 (33%)     max: 1982 Points
min: 2112     avg: 2189     median: 2146.5 (40%)     max: 2352 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 30989     avg: 33441     median: 33440.5 (31%)     max: 35892 Points
min: 37606     avg: 39400     median: 39399.5 (37%)     max: 41193 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2153     avg: 2160     median: 2160 (92%)     max: 2167 Points
min: 2174     avg: 2263     median: 2262.5 (96%)     max: 2351 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 832     avg: 836     median: 836 (93%)     max: 840 Points
900 Points (100%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 11814     avg: 12743     median: 12743 (31%)     max: 13672 Points
15466 Points (38%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4611     avg: 5035     median: 5035 (32%)     max: 5459 Points
min: 5924     avg: 6103     median: 6103 (39%)     max: 6282 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 313     avg: 313.5     median: 313.5 (88%)     max: 314 Points
min: 317     avg: 324.5     median: 324.5 (91%)     max: 332 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 54.22     avg: 57.8     median: 57.8 (75%)     max: 61.44 Points
72.2 Points (93%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.7     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (89%)     max: 3.77 Points
min: 4.02     avg: 4     median: 4 (95%)     max: 4.21 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 11745     avg: 11886     median: 11886 (72%)     max: 12027 Points
12643 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 91081     avg: 91124     median: 91123.5 (66%)     max: 91166 Points
94801 Points (69%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 124651     avg: 130357     median: 130356 (83%)     max: 136062 Points
144156 Points (92%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 17400     avg: 17429     median: 17429 (21%)     max: 17458 Points
18511 Points (23%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 50.891     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (1%)     max: 109.801 s
74.5 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.147     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (0%)     max: 2.252 s
2.1 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 12800     avg: 12813     median: 12812.5 (20%)     max: 12825 Points
16108 Points (26%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 117224     avg: 126436     median: 126436 (73%)     max: 135648 MIPS
min: 145144     avg: 146282     median: 145207 (83%)     max: 149570 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7040     avg: 7196     median: 7195.5 (85%)     max: 7351 MIPS
min: 7772     avg: 7893     median: 7932 (93%)     max: 7934 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 225.5     avg: 243.3     median: 243.3 (81%)     max: 261 fps
min: 75.9     avg: 181.2     median: 181.2 (61%)     max: 286.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 393.5     avg: 406.3     median: 406.3 (94%)     max: 419 fps
min: 257.5     avg: 345.5     median: 345.5 (80%)     max: 433.5 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 32.3     avg: 34.6     median: 34.6 (61%)     max: 36.8 fps
min: 40.8     avg: 41.4     median: 41.1 (72%)     max: 42.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 2.2     avg: 2.4     median: 2.4 (71%)     max: 2.6 GB/s
2.8 GB/s (82%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 4.4     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (78%)     max: 4.6 GB/s
5.8 GB/s (100%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 18     avg: 21.8     median: 21.8 (57%)     max: 25.6 GB/s
26.7 GB/s (70%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 155     avg: 181.5     median: 181.5 (2%)     max: 208 Seconds
min: 135     avg: 143     median: 144.5 (2%)     max: 147 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 91     avg: 100     median: 100 (1%)     max: 109 Seconds
min: 80     avg: 84.6     median: 85 (1%)     max: 87 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3788     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3826 sec
min: 0.3425     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.3504 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 11741     avg: 16203     median: 16203 (34%)     max: 20665 Points
min: 20532     avg: 22354     median: 22657.5 (48%)     max: 22928 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 5.953     avg: 6     median: 6 (1%)     max: 5.98 s
5.5 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 12.844     avg: 12.9     median: 12.9 (1%)     max: 12.894 s
12 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 305.942     avg: 311     median: 311 (1%)     max: 316.148 s
280.3 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
96298 Points (74%)
min: 11403     avg: 101267     median: 111512 (86%)     max: 114209 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 28739     avg: 30538     median: 30537.5 (76%)     max: 32336 Points
min: 28497     avg: 31204     median: 31391 (78%)     max: 32853 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
82048 Points (67%)
min: 89084     avg: 104553     median: 105332 (86%)     max: 111347 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
81495 Points (66%)
min: 88682     avg: 104672     median: 105402 (86%)     max: 110989 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
85692 Points (71%)
min: 90865     avg: 104818     median: 105098 (87%)     max: 110670 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
23358 Points (59%)
min: 27678     avg: 28978     median: 29112 (74%)     max: 30462 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 40312     avg: 44727     median: 44727 (80%)     max: 49142 Points
min: 48193     avg: 52181     median: 52491 (94%)     max: 56087 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 15951     avg: 18746     median: 18746 (79%)     max: 21541 Points
min: 19418     avg: 22303     median: 22579 (95%)     max: 23721 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2902     avg: 2922     median: 2922 (73%)     max: 2942 Points
min: 3108     avg: 3214     median: 3243 (81%)     max: 3294 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 18504     avg: 19147     median: 19147 (74%)     max: 19790 Points
min: 20435     avg: 21326     median: 21397 (83%)     max: 21790 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
min: 2985     avg: 3078     median: 3104 (99%)     max: 3150 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
min: 19463     avg: 20452     median: 20693 (85%)     max: 20754 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2092     avg: 2107     median: 2106.5 (82%)     max: 2121 Points
min: 2243     avg: 2347     median: 2369 (93%)     max: 2370 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19971     avg: 21565     median: 21565 (39%)     max: 23159 Points
min: 24552     avg: 25148     median: 25199 (45%)     max: 25867 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2039     avg: 2042     median: 2042 (9%)     max: 2045 Points
min: 2177     avg: 2237     median: 2247 (10%)     max: 2280 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 19766     avg: 21261     median: 21261 (67%)     max: 22756 Points
min: 23151     avg: 24582     median: 24467 (77%)     max: 25496 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8874     avg: 9089     median: 9089 (91%)     max: 9304 Points
min: 9620     avg: 9873     median: 9872.5 (99%)     max: 10009 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 72062     avg: 75782     median: 75781.5 (76%)     max: 79501 Points
min: 82660     avg: 87853     median: 88108.5 (88%)     max: 91119 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 439     avg: 439.5     median: 439.5 (1%)     max: 440 ms
min: 413     avg: 415     median: 414 (0%)     max: 418 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 303     avg: 308.5     median: 308.5 (85%)     max: 314 Points
min: 332     avg: 334.7     median: 334 (92%)     max: 338 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 311     avg: 325     median: 325 (58%)     max: 339 Points
min: 371     avg: 388.3     median: 386 (69%)     max: 410 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2194     avg: 2241     median: 2241 (84%)     max: 2288 Points
min: 2490     avg: 2566     median: 2584 (97%)     max: 2611 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 191.9     avg: 296     median: 296 (51%)     max: 400 Watt
537 Watt (93%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 287     avg: 357.5     median: 357.5 (65%)     max: 428 Watt
548 Watt (100%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.4     avg: 63.6     median: 63.6 (42%)     max: 104.8 Watt
min: 67.4     avg: 84.2     median: 77.6 (51%)     max: 151.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 12.8     avg: 14.5     median: 14.5 (11%)     max: 16.1 Points per Watt
11.5 Points per Watt (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-14700K → 100% n=54

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-14900K → 113% n=54

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 26. 03:47:48

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16391 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15092 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Apr 2025 05:16:04 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16391 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 16391 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15092 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 15092 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.042s ... 0.06s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.062s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)