Intel Core i5-8259U
► remove from comparison The Intel Core i5-8259U is a quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in April 2018. Compared to its predecessor Core i5-7267U, the CPU is now a quad-core with Hyperthreading support for the execution of up to 8 threads simultaneously. The base frequency is 2.3 GHz, but the Turbo goes all the way up to 3.8 GHz. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU with 128 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.
Compared to faster Core i5 and i7 models with eDRAM and 28 Watts, the i5-8259U only features 6 MB smart cache and the slowest clock of the Iris Plus GPU.
Architecture
Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.
Performance
Considering the clocks of the Core i5-8259U, its performance should be between the 15W models Core i5-8350U and Core i7-8550U. The i5-8259U should still be faster than the i7-8550U in practice thanks to the increased TDP, especially during sustained workloads.
Graphics
The integrated Intel Iris Plus 655 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz (slowest clock of the 655, the fastest is 1200 MHz in combination with the i7-8559U) and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 930M or 940MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Plus 650, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.
Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.
Power Consumption
The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for quad-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.
Intel Core i7-8559U
► remove from comparison The Intel Core i7-8559U is a quad-core SoC for notebooks based on the Coffee Lake architecture and was announced in April 2018. Compared to its predecessor Core i7-7567U, the CPU is now a quad-core with Hyperthreading support for the execution of up to 8 threads simultaneously. The base frequency is 2.7 GHz, but the Turbo goes all the way up to 4.5 GHz. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 GPU with 128 MB eDRAM, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.
Compared to faster Core i5 models with eDRAM and 28 Watts, the i5-8559U features 8 MB smart cache and the fastest clock of the Iris Plus GPU.
Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Kaby Lake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.
Clocked at up to 4.5 GHz, the Core i7-8559U is currently the fastest quad core ULV from Intel. Whether these speeds can be maintained in practice depends on the cooling capabilities of the laptop, but the performance should be above the Core i7-8650U due to the increased TDPConsidering the clocks of the Core i7-8559U, its performance should be between the 15W models Core i5-8350U and Core i7-8550U. The i5-8259U should still be faster than the i7-8550U in practice thanks to the increased TDP, especially during sustained workloads.
The integrated Intel Iris Plus 655 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Coffee Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1200 MHz and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 930M or 940MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Plus 650, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.
Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.
The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm++ process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel specifies the TDP with 28 Watts, which can be reduced to 23 Watts (cTDP Down) depending on the usage scenario. The TDP is pretty high compared to the common 15-Watt TDP for quad-core processors, but allows a better utilization of CPU and GPU Turbo.
Model | Intel Core i5-8259U | Intel Core i7-8559U |
Codename | Coffee Lake-U | Coffee Lake-U |
Series | Intel Coffee Lake | Intel Coffee Lake |
Series: Coffee Lake Coffee Lake-U | | |
Clock | 2300 - 3800 MHz | 2700 - 4500 MHz |
L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
L3 Cache | 6 MB | 8 MB |
Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
TDP | 28 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
max. Temp. | 100 °C | 100 °C |
Socket | FCBGA1528 | FCBGA1528 |
Features | Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE 4.2 | Dual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE 4.2 |
iGPU | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (300 - 1050 MHz) | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 (300 - 1200 MHz) |
| | |
Architecture | x86 | x86 |
Announced | | |
Manufacturer | ark.intel.com | ark.intel.com |
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8259U
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-8559U
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 3592 avg: 3792 median: 3728 (3%) max: 4025 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 93% |
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 959 avg: 976 median: 976.5 (41%) max: 991 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
98% | 100% |
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 369 avg: 378 median: 381 (42%) max: 386 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
98% | 100% |
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 91% |
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1385 avg: 1473 median: 1471 (4%) max: 1567 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 93% |
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 89% |
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 575 avg: 622 median: 615 (4%) max: 687 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 94% |
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 89% |
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 132 avg: 147.1 median: 148.7 (41%) max: 154 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 97% |
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 89% |
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 17799 avg: 20778 median: 19104.5 (11%) max: 28824 MIPS
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
94% | 100% |
min: 22033 avg: 26302 median: 26301.5 (15%) max: 30570 MIPS
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 92% |
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3753 avg: 3949 median: 3975.5 (47%) max: 4022 MIPS
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
97% | 100% |
min: 4826 avg: 5499 median: 5498.5 (65%) max: 6171 MIPS
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 85% |
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 38.5 avg: 39.5 median: 39.5 (13%) max: 40.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 162.3 avg: 165.1 median: 165.1 (38%) max: 167.95 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.72 avg: 5.2 median: 5.4 (9%) max: 5.49 fps
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
97% | 100% |
min: 5.523 avg: 5.7 median: 5.7 (10%) max: 5.9 fps
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 97% |
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 688 avg: 730 median: 729.5 (5%) max: 769 Seconds
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 100% |
min: 650 avg: 666 median: 666 (5%) max: 682 Seconds
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 100% |
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.738 avg: 0.8 median: 0.8 (17%) max: 0.818 sec
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 101% |
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
101% | 100% |
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7105 avg: 8348 median: 8528.5 (21%) max: 9276 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 91% |
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 90% |
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 47878 avg: 49579 median: 49578.5 (40%) max: 51279 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 93% |
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 92% |
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 47855 avg: 49509 median: 49509 (40%) max: 51163 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 94% |
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 17718 avg: 40451 median: 49722 (41%) max: 53914 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
72% | 100% |
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 5946 avg: 6904 median: 6670.5 (17%) max: 7927 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 93% |
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 92% |
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 8348 avg: 9726 median: 9743 (17%) max: 11006 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
98% | 100% |
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 99% |
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 2752 avg: 3096 median: 3132 (13%) max: 3346 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 98% |
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 94% |
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 948 avg: 961 median: 951 (37%) max: 984 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
98% | 100% |
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
86% | 100% |
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3359 avg: 3602 median: 3607 (6%) max: 3839 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 91% |
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 93% |
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 944 avg: 957 median: 948 (4%) max: 979 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
98% | 100% |
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 92% |
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3335 avg: 3571 median: 3567 (11%) max: 3811 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 91% |
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 84% |
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4200 avg: 4265 median: 4211 (42%) max: 4383 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
98% | 100% |
min: 5372 avg: 5384 median: 5383.5 (54%) max: 5395 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 86% |
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13421 avg: 14122 median: 13961 (14%) max: 14984 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 91% |
min: 17702 avg: 18095 median: 18095 (18%) max: 18488 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 80% |
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1010 avg: 1054 median: 1068 (1%) max: 1095 ms
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 100% |
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 173.3 avg: 176.9 median: 176 (32%) max: 182.4 Points
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 96% |
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.1 avg: 42 median: 39.5 (7%) max: 50.3 Watt
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
101% | 100% |
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.6 avg: 44.2 median: 43.7 (8%) max: 51.3 Watt
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 100% |
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
100% | 103% |
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 12.4 avg: 13.9 median: 13.9 (10%) max: 15.3 Points per Watt
10.8 Points per Watt (8%)
CPU TDP ? | TDP 28 W |
---|
78% | 100% |
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8259U → 100% n=37
Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-8559U → 116% n=37
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card

- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 19. 07:31:03
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10068 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 10072 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Jun 2025 05:19:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10068 +0.004s ... 0.006s
#8 got single benchmarks 10068 +0.007s ... 0.013s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10072 +0.004s ... 0.017s
#10 got single benchmarks 10072 +0.004s ... 0.021s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.044s ... 0.064s
#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.067s