Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13600K vs Intel Core i5-13500T

Intel Core i5-13600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13600K

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a fast mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 14 cores. Six fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and eight Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz.

Thanks to the faster P-cores and more E-cores, the i5-13600K is significantly faster than the old i5-12600K (especially in multi-threaded workloads. 

The 13600K is rated at 125 Watt TDP base power (PL1) and 181 Watt Turbo Power (PL2) and therefore slightly higher than the old Core i5-12600K.

Intel Core i5-13500T

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-13500T is a fast and very economical desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which was introduced in October 2022. The processor offers a base clock of 1.6 GHz and reaches up to 4.6 GHz in Turbo. The hybrid CPU architecture, which was introduced with Alder Lake, also benefits the Raptor Lake processors. The suffix T stands for a particularly economical CPU model, and with a TDP of just 35 watts (PL1 = 35 watts), these processors are ideally suited for small, compact systems.

Performance

The low power consumption ultimately results in slightly lower performance compared to the Intel Core i5-13500. Depending on how the PL2 (92 watts) is defined, there may be noticeable differences in multi-core performance. Compared to the Intel Core i5-12500T, the Intel Core i5-13500T is superior due to the higher number of physical computing units.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i5-12500T, the Intel Core i5-13500T offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, not much has changed with the new Intel UHD Graphics 770. The iGPU of the Intel Core i5-13500T also clocks 100 MHz higher, but this does not make a noticeable difference in everyday use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i5-13500T is 35 watts, with the option to increase this to up to 92 watts in Turbo mode. Compared to the Intel Core i5-12500T (PL2 = 74 watts), the maximum possible energy requirement increases slightly.

ModelIntel Core i5-13600KIntel Core i5-13500T
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-S
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900K compare3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K compare3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K « 3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500 compare2.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K compare3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K compare3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500 compare2.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T « 1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock3500 - 5100 MHz1600 - 4600 MHz
L2 Cache20 MB11.5 MB
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 20
6 x 5.1 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
14 / 20
6 x 4.6 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 3.2 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP125 Watt35 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
Die Size257 mm2215 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA 1700
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$319 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.com
TDP Turbo PL292 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13600K
42.9 pt (71%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500T
37 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
104 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
577 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 24174     avg: 24221     median: 24221 (22%)     max: 24268 Points
11028 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1991     avg: 2001     median: 2000.5 (85%)     max: 2010 Points
1754 Points (75%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 766     avg: 771     median: 770.5 (85%)     max: 775 Points
669 Points (74%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 9217     avg: 9241     median: 9241 (23%)     max: 9265 Points
4246 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3641     avg: 3642     median: 3642 (23%)     max: 3643 Points
1945 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 286     avg: 287.5     median: 287.5 (81%)     max: 289 Points
247 Points (69%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 42.2     avg: 42.3     median: 42.3 (55%)     max: 42.38 Points
21.3 Points (28%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.45     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (82%)     max: 3.48 Points
3.1 Points (72%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 10710     avg: 10755     median: 10754.5 (65%)     max: 10799 Points
8693 Points (53%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 67973     avg: 68880     median: 68879.5 (50%)     max: 69786 Points
40528 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 110412     avg: 110969     median: 110969 (71%)     max: 111526 Points
62808 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 16074     avg: 16155     median: 16154.5 (20%)     max: 16235 Points
14147 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 172.189     avg: 174.9     median: 174.9 (2%)     max: 177.592 s
133.3 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.518     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (1%)     max: 2.527 s
4.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 10937     avg: 10967     median: 10967 (17%)     max: 10997 Points
6683 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 89527     avg: 89587     median: 89587 (51%)     max: 89647 MIPS
40034 MIPS (23%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6253     avg: 6378     median: 6377.5 (75%)     max: 6502 MIPS
5840 MIPS (69%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 198.6     avg: 198.8     median: 198.8 (66%)     max: 199 fps
100.5 fps (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 387     avg: 387.5     median: 387.5 (89%)     max: 388 fps
259.5 fps (60%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 27.5     avg: 27.6     median: 27.6 (48%)     max: 27.6 fps
12.1 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.7 GB/s (50%)
1 GB/s (29%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 3.1     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (54%)     max: 3.2 GB/s
1.8 GB/s (31%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 18.8     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (50%)     max: 19.4 GB/s
8.2 GB/s (21%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
224 Seconds (3%)
533 Seconds (7%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
135 Seconds (1%)
291 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4048     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.405 sec
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
17627 Points (38%)
12818 Points (27%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.471     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (1%)     max: 6.58 s
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 14.876     avg: 14.9     median: 14.9 (1%)     max: 14.993 s
17.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 328.929     avg: 331.4     median: 331.4 (1%)     max: 333.798 s
430.1 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
97718 Points (75%)
54029 Points (42%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 30358     avg: 30419     median: 30419 (76%)     max: 30480 Points
12162 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 86734     avg: 86952     median: 86952 (71%)     max: 87170 Points
70975 Points (58%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 87784     avg: 87861     median: 87860.5 (71%)     max: 87937 Points
69547 Points (56%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 88547     avg: 89321     median: 89321 (74%)     max: 90095 Points
77848 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 26359     avg: 26394     median: 26394 (67%)     max: 26429 Points
13665 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 35386     avg: 35395     median: 35395 (63%)     max: 35404 Points
18673 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 17079     avg: 17102     median: 17101.5 (72%)     max: 17124 Points
6210 Points (26%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2393 Points (60%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
7327 Points (28%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1967     avg: 1973     median: 1973 (77%)     max: 1979 Points
1716 Points (67%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16651     avg: 16671     median: 16670.5 (30%)     max: 16690 Points
7377 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1931     avg: 1948     median: 1947.5 (8%)     max: 1964 Points
1685 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16497     avg: 16566     median: 16566 (52%)     max: 16635 Points
7316 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8618     avg: 8625     median: 8624.5 (86%)     max: 8631 Points
7069 Points (71%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 60407     avg: 61014     median: 61014 (61%)     max: 61621 Points
29164 Points (29%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 467     avg: 468     median: 468 (1%)     max: 469 ms
562 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
288 Points (79%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 329     avg: 331     median: 331 (59%)     max: 333 Points
254 Points (46%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2237     avg: 2254     median: 2254 (84%)     max: 2271 Points
1324 Points (50%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 278     avg: 313     median: 313 (54%)     max: 348 Watt
55.6 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 245     avg: 265.5     median: 265.5 (48%)     max: 286 Watt
79.3 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 69.3     avg: 73.3     median: 73.3 (48%)     max: 77.3 Watt
8.6 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 12.7     avg: 13.8     median: 13.8 (10%)     max: 14.9 Points per Watt
21.9 Points per Watt (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13600K → 100% n=47

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500T → 66% n=47

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 15. 13:59:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14626 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17902 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 13 May 2025 05:18:04 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14626 +0.006s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14626 +0.006s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17902 +0.004s ... 0.019s

#10 got single benchmarks 17902 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.069s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.072s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)