Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13500T vs Intel Core i9-13900K vs Intel Core i7-13700K

Intel Core i5-13500T

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core i5-13500T is a fast and very economical desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, which was introduced in October 2022. The processor offers a base clock of 1.6 GHz and reaches up to 4.6 GHz in Turbo. The hybrid CPU architecture, which was introduced with Alder Lake, also benefits the Raptor Lake processors. The suffix T stands for a particularly economical CPU model, and with a TDP of just 35 watts (PL1 = 35 watts), these processors are ideally suited for small, compact systems.

Performance

The low power consumption ultimately results in slightly lower performance compared to the Intel Core i5-13500. Depending on how the PL2 (92 watts) is defined, there may be noticeable differences in multi-core performance. Compared to the Intel Core i5-12500T, the Intel Core i5-13500T is superior due to the higher number of physical computing units.

Graphics unit

Like the Intel Core i5-12500T, the Intel Core i5-13500T offers an integrated graphics unit. The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, not much has changed with the new Intel UHD Graphics 770. The iGPU of the Intel Core i5-13500T also clocks 100 MHz higher, but this does not make a noticeable difference in everyday use.

Power consumption

The TDP of the Intel Core i5-13500T is 35 watts, with the option to increase this to up to 92 watts in Turbo mode. Compared to the Intel Core i5-12500T (PL2 = 74 watts), the maximum possible energy requirement increases slightly.

Intel Core i9-13900K

► remove from comparison Intel i9-13900K

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a fast high-end desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 24 cores and 32 threads. Eight fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3 - 5.8 GHz and sixteen Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.2 - 4.3 GHz.

Thanks to the faster P-cores and more E-cores, the i9-13900K is significantly faster than the old i9-12900K (especially in multi-threaded workloads). Compared to the Raphael AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (Zen 4), the 13900K offers a slightly higher multi-thread-performance and a slightly lower single core performance. In games, the Intel CPU is currently the clear winner (at the time of announcement of the 7950X).

The 13900K is rated at 125 Watt TDP base power (PL1) and 253 Watt Turbo Power (PL2) and therefore slightly higher than the old i9-12900K.

Intel Core i7-13700K

► remove from comparison Intel i7-13700K

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a high-end CPU based on the current Raptor Lake architecture, which was introduced in September 2022. The base clock is 3.4 GHz and can reach up to 5.4 GHz under optimal conditions. The total of 16 cores are divided into 8 P-cores and 8 E-cores, which we already know from the Alder Lake architecture. Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700K, however, the number of E-cores has been doubled, meaning that the Intel Core i7-13700K now offers 24 threads. As usual, the K models continue to offer a freely selectable multiplier, which simplifies overclocking. In addition, all new Raptor Lake processors can be operated on the existing Socket 1700 motherboards.

Performance

Compared to the Intel Core i7-12700K, the Core i7-13700K still offers 8 P-cores, but these are to be relieved by 8 additional E-cores for demanding applications. The E-cores primarily take care of background applications. The hybrid architecture relies on the Intel Thread Director, which is responsible for the correct allocation of tasks. Compared to Alder Lake, the number of e-cores has been doubled, which significantly improves multi-thread performance in combination with a further increase in IPC. If all requirements are met, Intel Turbo Boost 3.0 can increase the clock rate of the P-cores to up to 5.4 GHz. The E-cores can also be overclocked and reach a maximum of 3.4 GHz.

Graphics

Like the Intel Core i7-12700K, the Intel Core i7-13700K offers an integrated graphics unit (iGPU). The Intel Iris Xe architecture continues to serve as the basis. In terms of performance, however, not much has changed with the new Intel UHD Graphics 770.

Power Consumption

The Intel Core i7-13700K is specified with a TDP of 125 watts, which corresponds to the PL1 value. In Boost mode, the processor's performance can increase to up to 253 watts (PL2). However, this requires good cooling. If all restrictions are deactivated in the BIOS, the PL2 value is not restricted by a Tau value.

ModelIntel Core i5-13500TIntel Core i9-13900KIntel Core i7-13700K
CodenameRaptor LakeRaptor LakeRaptor Lake
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-SIntel Raptor Lake-S
Series: Raptor Lake-S Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900K3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T « 1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K « 3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i9-13900K3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K « 3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-135002.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock1600 - 4600 MHz3000 - 5800 MHz3400 - 5400 MHz
L2 Cache11.5 MB32 MB24 MB
L3 Cache24 MB36 MB30 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 20
6 x 4.6 GHz Intel Golden Cove P-Core
8 x 3.2 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
24 / 32
8 x 5.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.3 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
16 / 24
8 x 5.4 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP35 Watt125 Watt125 Watt
TDP Turbo PL292 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
Die Size215 mm2257 mm2257 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketLGA 1700LGA 1700LGA 1700
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 4800 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1550 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
$589 U.S.$409 U.S.
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.intel.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13500T
37 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900K
49 pt (82%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i7-13700K
46.1 pt (77%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
104 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
577 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11028 Points (10%)
min: 32592     avg: 37310     median: 38271.5 (36%)     max: 40103 Points
min: 30737     avg: 30745     median: 30745 (29%)     max: 30753 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1754 Points (75%)
min: 2203     avg: 2238     median: 2238.5 (95%)     max: 2272 Points
min: 2114     avg: 2116     median: 2116 (90%)     max: 2118 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
669 Points (74%)
min: 828     avg: 849     median: 849.5 (94%)     max: 870 Points
min: 808     avg: 812     median: 811.5 (90%)     max: 815 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4246 Points (10%)
min: 13415     avg: 14459     median: 14620.5 (36%)     max: 15181 Points
min: 11685     avg: 11714     median: 11713.5 (29%)     max: 11742 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1945 Points (12%)
min: 5321     avg: 5798     median: 5805.5 (37%)     max: 6191 Points
min: 4438     avg: 4508     median: 4507.5 (28%)     max: 4577 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
247 Points (69%)
min: 299     avg: 314.1     median: 318 (89%)     max: 328 Points
303 Points (85%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
21.3 Points (28%)
min: 62.2     avg: 67     median: 67.5 (87%)     max: 70.78 Points
53 Points (69%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (72%)
min: 3.8     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (92%)     max: 3.93 Points
3.7 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8693 Points (53%)
min: 11661     avg: 11989     median: 12017.5 (73%)     max: 12259 Points
11278 Points (68%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
40528 Points (29%)
min: 85342     avg: 88253     median: 87738 (64%)     max: 92192 Points
85748 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
62808 Points (40%)
min: 132000     avg: 134526     median: 133567 (85%)     max: 138969 Points
135499 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
14147 Points (17%)
min: 17418     avg: 17943     median: 17998.5 (22%)     max: 18355 Points
17002 Points (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
133.3 s (2%)
min: 79.738     avg: 84.6     median: 84.2 (1%)     max: 90.13 s
170.2 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.8 s (1%)
min: 1.818     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2.305 s
2.3 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6683 Points (11%)
min: 13210     avg: 14265     median: 14271 (23%)     max: 15309 Points
12835 Points (20%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
40034 MIPS (23%)
min: 127201     avg: 142777     median: 146984 (84%)     max: 148053 MIPS
min: 110420     avg: 111390     median: 111390 (64%)     max: 112359 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5840 MIPS (69%)
min: 7176     avg: 7343     median: 7272 (86%)     max: 7539 MIPS
min: 7061     avg: 7062     median: 7061.5 (83%)     max: 7062 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100.5 fps (34%)
min: 247.5     avg: 261.5     median: 264.8 (89%)     max: 269 fps
232 fps (78%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
259.5 fps (60%)
min: 412     avg: 419     median: 419.3 (97%)     max: 425.5 fps
406 fps (94%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12.1 fps (21%)
min: 34.5     avg: 39.9     median: 40.7 (72%)     max: 42.6 fps
min: 33.7     avg: 33.9     median: 33.9 (59%)     max: 34 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (29%)
min: 2.6     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (85%)     max: 3 GB/s
2.2 GB/s (65%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
min: 5.2     avg: 5.4     median: 5.4 (93%)     max: 5.4 GB/s
4 GB/s (69%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8.2 GB/s (21%)
min: 20.5     avg: 23.3     median: 22.9 (60%)     max: 27 GB/s
15.8 GB/s (41%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
533 Seconds (7%)
min: 136     avg: 145.2     median: 140.5 (2%)     max: 174 Seconds
min: 174     avg: 176.5     median: 176.5 (2%)     max: 179 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
291 Seconds (2%)
min: 80     avg: 85.7     median: 84 (1%)     max: 101 Seconds
min: 106     avg: 108     median: 108 (1%)     max: 110 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
min: 0.3468     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3911 sec
min: 0.3855     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (8%)     max: 0.3899 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12818 Points (27%)
min: 19989     avg: 20578     median: 20192 (43%)     max: 21934 Points
18153 Points (39%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8 s (2%)
min: 5.655     avg: 5.7     median: 5.7 (1%)     max: 5.86 s
6.2 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.9 s (1%)
min: 12.287     avg: 12.6     median: 12.5 (1%)     max: 13.193 s
13.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
430.1 s (2%)
min: 289.628     avg: 296.6     median: 293.3 (1%)     max: 310.125 s
317.8 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
54029 Points (42%)
min: 86915     avg: 97290     median: 96473 (74%)     max: 112434 Points
85363 Points (66%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
12162 Points (30%)
min: 29023     avg: 31289     median: 31187.5 (78%)     max: 33181 Points
31214 Points (78%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
70975 Points (58%)
min: 79257     avg: 97847     median: 97246.5 (79%)     max: 111988 Points
99898 Points (81%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
69547 Points (56%)
min: 80320     avg: 96904     median: 97919.5 (79%)     max: 102987 Points
99878 Points (81%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
77848 Points (65%)
min: 83056     avg: 98634     median: 97311 (81%)     max: 105981 Points
103719 Points (86%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
13665 Points (35%)
min: 26626     avg: 29034     median: 29044.5 (73%)     max: 30955 Points
28204 Points (71%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
18673 Points (33%)
min: 46013     avg: 51456     median: 51140 (91%)     max: 54226 Points
45127 Points (80%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
6210 Points (26%)
min: 16236     avg: 20507     median: 20037 (84%)     max: 22794 Points
18897 Points (80%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2393 Points (60%)
3070 Points (77%)
2962 Points (74%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
7327 Points (28%)
20800 Points (81%)
19249 Points (75%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1716 Points (67%)
min: 2106     avg: 2237     median: 2286 (89%)     max: 2290 Points
min: 2081     avg: 2110     median: 2110 (82%)     max: 2139 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
7377 Points (13%)
min: 22448     avg: 23743     median: 24033 (43%)     max: 24157 Points
min: 19719     avg: 20191     median: 20190.5 (36%)     max: 20662 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1685 Points (7%)
min: 2148     avg: 2191     median: 2197 (10%)     max: 2246 Points
2064 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7316 Points (23%)
min: 22024     avg: 23446     median: 23664 (75%)     max: 24021 Points
19217 Points (61%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7069 Points (71%)
min: 9218     avg: 9542     median: 9598 (96%)     max: 9683 Points
8955 Points (89%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
29164 Points (29%)
min: 77347     avg: 84105     median: 85336 (85%)     max: 86695 Points
69210 Points (69%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
562 ms (1%)
min: 423     avg: 430.6     median: 432 (1%)     max: 438 ms
min: 444     avg: 445.7     median: 444 (1%)     max: 449 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 304     avg: 317.6     median: 316 (87%)     max: 335 Points
301 Points (83%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
254 Points (46%)
min: 338     avg: 364     median: 368 (66%)     max: 382 Points
348 Points (62%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1324 Points (50%)
min: 2263     avg: 2497     median: 2580 (96%)     max: 2589 Points
2325 Points (87%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
55.6 Watt (10%)
min: 228     avg: 354.3     median: 359 (62%)     max: 471 Watt
357 Watt (62%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
79.3 Watt (14%)
min: 349     avg: 392.5     median: 370.5 (68%)     max: 480 Watt
357 Watt (65%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
8.6 Watt (6%)
83.7 Watt (55%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
21.9 Points per Watt (16%)
min: 12.9     avg: 15     median: 15.2 (11%)     max: 16.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13500T → 100% n=49

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900K → 215% n=49

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-13700K → 187% n=49

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 15. 07:52:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17902 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14625 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14998 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 13 May 2025 05:18:04 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17902 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 17902 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14625 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#11 got single benchmarks 14625 +0.019s ... 0.037s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14998 +0.003s ... 0.04s

#13 got single benchmarks 14998 +0.004s ... 0.044s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.077s ... 0.122s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.122s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)