Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom Z3795 vs Intel Atom Z3770 vs Intel Atom Z3680D

Intel Atom Z3795

► remove from comparison Intel Z3795

The Intel Atom Z3795 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.59 - 2.39 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. Compared to the Z3775, the Z3795 offers a slightly higher CPU base clock.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and a clock speed of 1.59 - 2.39 GHz, the Z3795 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the Z2760. The Z3795 even beats some of the Kabini APUs like the AMD A4-5000, as well as ARM SoCs like Tegra 4 and the Snapdragon 800. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 778 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) and comparable to the Qualcomm Adreno 320 (as found in the Snapdragon 600). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 2560 x 1600 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3770

► remove from comparison Intel Z3770

The Intel Atom Z3770 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.46 - 2.4 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to 4 CPU cores and a clock speed of 1.46 - 2.4 GHz, the Z3770 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the Z2760. In our benchmarks, the Z3770 even slightly beats the Kabini APU AMD A4-5000, as well as ARM SoCs like Tegra 4 and the Snapdragon 800. For everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for very complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 667 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) and comparable to the Qualcomm Adreno 320 (as found in the Snapdragon 600). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 2560 x 1600 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an SDP of 2 watts, which indicates a TDP of less than 4 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

Intel Atom Z3680D

► remove from comparison Intel Z3680D

The Intel Atom Z3680D is a power-efficient dual-core SoC for Windows and Android tablets. It is clocked at 1.33 - 2.0 GHz and is part of the Bay Trail-T platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22nm low-power design process (P1271) with Tri-Gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to its predecessor. In contrast to the Z3680, the Z3680D offers a different memory controller and a lower display resolution.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, and enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major additions are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Z3680D is faster than previous Intel Atoms like the Z2760. Presumably, the Z3680D even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 688 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding Windows games will run fluently. However, video acceleration and display resolutions up to 1920 x 1200 pixels are no problem for the chip.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC should be rated at an SDP of about 2 W, which would indicate a TDP of less than 4 W. Thus, the chip can be used in passively cooled tablets.

ModelIntel Atom Z3795Intel Atom Z3770Intel Atom Z3680D
CodenameBay Trail-TBay Trail-TBay Trail-T
SeriesIntel AtomIntel AtomIntel Atom
Series: Atom Bay Trail-T
Intel Atom Z3795 « 1.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37851.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37751.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775D1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37701.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770D1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736F1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736G1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37451.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37401.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735E1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735F1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735G1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z36801.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z3680D1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z37951.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37851.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37751.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775D1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770 « 1.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770D1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736F1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736G1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37451.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37401.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735E1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735F1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735G1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z36801.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z3680D1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z37951.59 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37851.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37751.46 - 2.39 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3775D1.49 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37701.46 - 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3770D1.5 - 2.41 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736F1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3736G1.33 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37451.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3745D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z37401.33 - 1.86 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3740D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735D1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735E1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735F1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z3735G1.33 - 1.83 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Atom Z36801.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Atom Z3680D « 1.33 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1590 - 2390 MHz1460 - 2400 MHz1330 - 2000 MHz
L1 Cache224 KB224 KB112 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 42 / 2
TDP4 Watt4 Watt4 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm22 nm
SocketUTFCBGA1380UTFCBGA1380
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 311 - 778 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 4 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1067Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 311 - 667 MHz), Quick Sync, Wireless Display, Clear Video HD, Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, Secure Key, Anti-Theft, Identify-Protection, max. 4 GB Dual-Channel LPDDR3-1067Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 688 MHz), Intel 64, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2, AES-NI, max. 2 GB Single-Channel DDR3L-RS 1333, Quick Sync
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 778 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (311 - 667 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 688 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$40 U.S.$37 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 118     avg: 127.7     median: 131 (1%)     max: 134 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 36     avg: 37     median: 37 (10%)     max: 38 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.61     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (2%)     max: 1.64 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.4 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1220     avg: 1393.7     median: 1234 (7%)     max: 1727 Points
min: 997     avg: 1157.6     median: 1189 (7%)     max: 1230 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3324     avg: 3715     median: 3715 (3%)     max: 4106 Points
min: 2848     avg: 3690.5     median: 3961 (3%)     max: 4035 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 1727     avg: 4390.3     median: 5683 (4%)     max: 5761 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1727     avg: 2950.7     median: 1732 (2%)     max: 5393 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1020 s (81%)
min: 837     avg: 922     median: 862.5 (68%)     max: 1126 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 25.93     avg: 27.2     median: 27.2 (80%)     max: 28.4 s
min: 24     avg: 25.9     median: 26.6 (78%)     max: 26.6 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1075 Points (2%)
898 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 7.12     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (3%)     max: 9.5 fps
min: 6.2     avg: 7.8     median: 7.7 (3%)     max: 9.5 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 37.15     avg: 42.1     median: 42.1 (10%)     max: 47.13 fps
min: 31.5     avg: 39.3     median: 40.5 (9%)     max: 45.9 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.124     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.125 GB/s
min: 0.077     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (4%)     max: 0.123 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.193     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (3%)     max: 0.195 GB/s
min: 0.12     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (3%)     max: 0.193 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 0.885     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (2%)     max: 0.891 GB/s
min: 0.44     avg: 0.8     median: 0.9 (2%)     max: 0.886 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2069     avg: 2145.5     median: 2145.5 (5%)     max: 2222 Points
min: 2203     avg: 2212     median: 2212 (5%)     max: 2221 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 36.26     avg: 36.6     median: 36.6 (149%)     max: 24.58 s
min: 27     avg: 33.3     median: 36 (146%)     max: 24.58 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 79.6     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (165%)     max: 48.81 s
min: 61     avg: 74     median: 80 (164%)     max: 48.81 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1732     avg: 1734.5     median: 1734.5 (160%)     max: 1081 s
min: 1566     avg: 1685.7     median: 1735 (160%)     max: 1081 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
24.2 MIPS (0%)
min: 15.66     avg: 7984.3     median: 7984.3 (4%)     max: 15953 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
12.2 MFLOPS (0%)
min: 7.38     avg: 3730.7     median: 3730.7 (3%)     max: 7454 MFLOPS
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
3552 Points (3%)
min: 3379     avg: 4056.5     median: 4056.5 (3%)     max: 4734 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1141     avg: 1385.5     median: 1301 (3%)     max: 1799 Points
min: 1199     avg: 1352.6     median: 1330 (3%)     max: 1512 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
18838 Points (15%)
min: 11561     avg: 16054     median: 17754 (14%)     max: 18706 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 17931     avg: 18729.3     median: 18754 (15%)     max: 19503 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
20794 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 956     avg: 1315.6     median: 1471 (5%)     max: 1555 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 1348     avg: 1748     median: 1748 (3%)     max: 2148 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2998     avg: 3035     median: 3035 (5%)     max: 3072 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 977     avg: 980.5     median: 980.5 (19%)     max: 984 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 2472     avg: 2522.5     median: 2522.5 (20%)     max: 2573 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 2278     avg: 2357.5     median: 2357.5 (21%)     max: 2437 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 3092     avg: 3110     median: 3110 (6%)     max: 3128 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 3617     avg: 3637     median: 3637 (7%)     max: 3657 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 3063     avg: 3084.5     median: 3084.5 (8%)     max: 3106 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 8367     avg: 8367     median: 8367 (111%)     max: 7545 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
388.3 ms (97%)
min: 567     avg: 567     median: 567 (141%)     max: 400.9 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 577     avg: 577     median: 577 (477%)     max: 120.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
3353 Points (3%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
Errors [Close]

#0 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 37>24.58 for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.05s

#1 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 37>24.58 for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.05s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 81>48.81 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.051s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 81>48.81 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.052s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1737>1081 for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.053s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1756>1081 for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.053s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 717> for benchmark 118, setting:435 +0s ... 0.074s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 265> for benchmark 118, setting:434 +0s ... 0.075s

#8 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 8367>7545 for benchmark 241, setting:699 +0s ... 0.076s

#9 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 567>400.9 for benchmark 124, setting:649 +0s ... 0.077s

#10 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 577>120.9 for benchmark 124, setting:437 +0s ... 0.077s

#11 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 22792> for benchmark 123, setting:436 +0s ... 0.078s

#12 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 36357> for benchmark 238, setting:693 +0s ... 0.079s

#13 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 428> for benchmark 222, setting:657 +0s ... 0.079s

#14 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 21235> for benchmark 222, setting:656 +0s ... 0.08s

log 19. 05:18:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 5968 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4470 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 4580 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 19 May 2025 05:18:44 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 5968 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 5968 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 4470 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#11 got single benchmarks 4470 +0.006s ... 0.021s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 4580 +0.001s ... 0.021s

#13 got single benchmarks 4580 +0s ... 0.022s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.023s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.024s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.026s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.027s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.028s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.03s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.031s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.032s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.033s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.034s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.035s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.036s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.037s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.037s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.038s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.039s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.04s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.041s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.041s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.042s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.043s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.044s

#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.045s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.046s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.046s

#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.047s

#41 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.048s

#42 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.049s

#43 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.05s

#44 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.05s

#45 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.051s

#46 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.052s

#47 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.053s

#48 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.053s

#49 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.054s

#50 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.054s

#51 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.055s

#52 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.055s

#53 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.056s

#54 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.056s

#55 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.057s

#56 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.059s

#57 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.06s

#58 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.062s

#59 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.064s

#60 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.066s

#61 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.069s

#62 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.071s

#63 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.071s

#64 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.072s

#65 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.072s

#66 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.072s

#67 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.073s

#68 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.073s

#69 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.074s

#70 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.074s

#71 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.075s

#72 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.076s

#73 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.076s

#74 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.077s

#75 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.077s

#76 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.078s

#77 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.078s

#78 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.079s

#79 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.079s

#80 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.08s

#81 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.08s

#82 return log +0s ... 0.08s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)