Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 265H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

Intel Core Ultra 7 265H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 265H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 16 cores consisting of 6 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 5.3 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.5 GHz clock speed and two additional "low power" efficiency cores with up to 2.5 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 24 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 28 watt (PL1, 115W PL2).

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Enterprise. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 140T graphics card which offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.3 GHz.

Performance - High End

Compared to the fastest model of the Arrow Lake-H series (Core Ultra 9 285H), the Core Ultra 7 as only slightly slower due to a reduced maximum Turbo frequency of 100 MHz. Thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should reach the level of the old Raptor Lake Core Core 9 270H (6 + 8 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU ideal for very demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Chiplet design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile from Intel using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also is produced at TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile are also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 255H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 255H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 16 cores consisting of 6 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 5.1 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.4 GHz clock speed and two additional "low power" efficiency cores with up to 2.5 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 24 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 28 watt (PL1, 115W PL2).

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Essentials. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 140T graphics card which offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.25 GHz.

Performance - High End

The Core Ultra 7 is superior to the top model Core Ultra 9 285H as only the maximum Turbo frequency is 200 MHz lower. Due to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should perform slightly below the level of the old Raptor Lake Core Core 9 270H (6 + 8 cores, max 5.8 / 4.1 GHz). This makes the CPU very suitable for demanding tasks such as high-end gaming and content creation.

Chiplet design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile from Intel using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also is produced at TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile are also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 265HIntel Core Ultra 7 255H
CodenameArrow Lake-HArrow Lake-H
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeIntel Arrow Lake
Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H « 4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H compare4.3 - 4.9 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H « 4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H compare4.3 - 4.9 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Clock4500 - 5300 MHz4400 - 5100 MHz
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 16
6 x 5.3 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
16 / 16
6 x 5.1 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.4 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt115 Watt
Technology5 nm5 nm
max. Temp.110 °C110 °C
iGPUIntel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2300 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$471 U.S.$514 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 255H
43.8 pt (73%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
127.6 Points (72%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1053 Points (20%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
20022 Points (19%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2152 Points (91%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
826 Points (92%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7884 Points (19%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3291 Points (21%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
322 Points (90%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
66152 MIPS (38%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6169 MIPS (73%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
23.2 fps (41%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
295 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
178 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
24679 Points (61%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
37837 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
13375 Points (56%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2907 Points (73%)
min: 2858     avg: 2891     median: 2890.5 (72%)     max: 2923 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
14502 Points (56%)
min: 15776     avg: 16633     median: 16632.5 (65%)     max: 17489 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2112 Points (83%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
17218 Points (31%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
455 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
116699 Points (90%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
291 Points (80%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
310 Points (56%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2018 Points (75%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
81.4 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
101.7 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
4.8 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
7.4 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
32.4 Points per Watt (24%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 265H → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 255H → 107% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 20:09:03

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18901 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18903 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:16:39 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18901 +0s ... 0.003s

#8 got single benchmarks 18901 +0s ... 0.003s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18903 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#10 got single benchmarks 18903 +0s ... 0.005s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.005s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.013s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.013s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)