Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 5 225H vs Intel Core Ultra 5 235H

Intel Core Ultra 5 225H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 225H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 14 cores consisting of 4 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 4.9 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.3 GHz clock speed and two additional "low power" efficiency cores with up to 2.5 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 24 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 28 watts (PL1, 115W PL2).

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Essentials. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 130T graphics card which offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.2 GHz.

Performance - High End

Compared to the more powerful variants (such as the top model Core Ultra 9 285H) due to the lack of two P-cores. However, thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should be able to hold its own against its Raptor Lake predecessors. As a result, the CPU is also very suitable for demanding tasks such as gaming and content creation.

Chiplet design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also comes from TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

Intel Core Ultra 5 235H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 235H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H is a mobile high-end CPU for larger notebooks based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It offers 14 cores consisting of 4 fast performance cores (Lion Cove) with up to 5 GHz and 8 smaller efficiency cores (Skymont) with up to 4.4 GHz clock speed and two additional "low power" efficiency cores with up to 2.4 GHz (Skymont). The CPU has access to 18 MB of cache and is specified with a TDP of 28 watts (PL1, 115W PL2).

The SoC integrates a small dedicated NPU called AI Boost with 13 TOPS (Int8) and optionally supports vPro Enterprise. The integrated memory controller supports up to 192 GB LPDDR5/x-8400 or DDR5-6400 (dual channel). The integrated GPU (iGPU) is an Intel Arc 140T graphics card which offers eight Xe cores with up to 2.25 GHz.

Performance - High End

Compared to the more powerful variants (such as the top model Core Ultra 9 285H) due to the lack of two P-cores. However, thanks to the improved IPC of the cores (especially the efficiency cores), the CPU should be able to hold its own against its Raptor Lake predecessors. As a result, the CPU is also very suitable for demanding tasks such as gaming and content creation.

Chiplet design

Like the desktop and HX chips, the Arrow Lake-H chips are based on individual chiplets that are placed on a 22nm base tile using Foveros 3D packaging. The CPU part comes from TSMC using the modern N3B (3nm) process. As with HX, the GPU also comes from TSMC and is manufactured using the N5P process. SoC and I/O Tile also from TSMC but in the older N6 process.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 5 225HIntel Core Ultra 5 235H
CodenameArrow Lake-HArrow Lake-H
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeIntel Arrow Lake
Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H compare4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H « 4.3 - 4.9 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 265H compare4.5 - 5.3 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H compare4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H « 4.4 - 5.1 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H4.3 - 4.9 GHz16 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Clock4300 - 4900 MHz4400 - 5100 MHz
L3 Cache18 MB18 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 16
4 x 4.9 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.3 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.3 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
16 / 16
4 x 5.0 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.4 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
2 x 2.4 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2115 Watt115 Watt
Technology5 nm5 nm
max. Temp.110 °C110 °C
iGPUIntel Arc Graphics 130T ( - 2200 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 140T ( - 2250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$385 U.S.$354 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2678 Points (67%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
13434 Points (52%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 225H → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 20:09:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18910 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18908 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:16:39 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18910 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 18910 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18908 +0s ... 0.007s

#10 got single benchmarks 18908 +0s ... 0.007s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.007s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.008s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.01s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)