Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H vs Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 5 135H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a mid-range Meteor Lake family chip that debuted in December 2023. This 1st Gen Core Ultra processor has come to replace 13th generation Core processors; it has 14 cores (4 + 8 +2) and 18 threads at its disposal. Its Performance cores, of which there are 4, are HT-enabled and run at up to 4.6 GHz while its Efficient cores, of which there are 10 (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) run at up to 3.6 GHz. The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.20 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well such as the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 5 135H comes with 18 MB of L3 cache which is a significant reduction compared to the 24 MB that the 155H, the 165H and the 185H have. The processor has a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s; it supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). vPro Enterprise and business-centric features such as the Remote Platform Erase are onboard as well. Naturally, the 135H also features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support. It is also worth mentioning that Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 135H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

While we have no way of knowing what the 135H will be like, as of December 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be at least as fast as the Ryzen 7 7735HS (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.75 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.20 GHz is set to give the Radeon 780M something to think about. The Arc is set to be miles ahead of aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. As long as one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This Core Ultra 5 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus higher performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 135H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 7 155H

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a high-end laptop processor of the Meteor Lake series that has 16 cores (6 + 8 + 2) and 22 threads at its disposal. This 1st Gen Core Ultra chip has come to replace 13th generation Core chips; its 16 cores are comprised of 6 HT-enabled Performance cores running at up to 4.8 GHz and 10 Efficient cores (8 main cores plus 2 extra ones found in the Low Power Island) running at up to 3.8 GHz.

The 8-core Arc GPU, just out of the oven, serves as the integrated graphics adapter - this runs at up to 2.30 GHz - and there is a bevy of other brand-new technologies on offer as well, including the integrated AI Boost NPU with two Gen 3 engines for hardware AI workload acceleration.

Architecture and Features

With Meteor Lake, Intel intends to deliver higher CPU performance, higher GPU performance and at the same time, longer battery life than what Raptor Lake chips were capable of. The company also wants a large piece of the AI cake and is working with Microsoft and other partners to make that happen. As a result, Windows Defender is now AI-enabled, meaning it can use the Intel NPU to take some of the load off the main CPU cores. We also get this new Intel Device Discovery technology that is designed to give us a better hardware-based remote laptop management than ever before; and, to make things even better, Intel now offers a dedicated Arc Pro graphics driver for workstations.

This generation of Intel Core processors features Redwood architecture P-cores and Crestmont architecture E-cores. Both come with slight architectural improvements over Raptor Cove and Gracemont respectively for slightly higher performance-per-clock figures; the interesting thing is that of the 10 E-cores, two are actually a separate cluster located on what Intel calls a "Low Power Island". Essentially, the latter is an SoC within an SoC that can stay active while most other parts of the chip are temporarily switched off to save power. The low-power E-cores run at up to 2.5 GHz. Intel hopes this approach will let it deliver unprecedentedly low power consumption figures when under low load, boosting battery life of laptops and tablets powered by Meteor Lake.

To build its Meteor Lake processors, Intel uses the Foveros technology (stacking several chips on top of each other). This is a cost-cutting measure more than anything else, as manufacturing several small dies on several different processes is so much cheaper than making a huge single die and hoping that there are no defects in it that will require disabling some parts of it.

Elsewhere, the Core Ultra 7 155H comes with 24 MB of L3 cache and a very healthy number of PCIe 5 and PCIe 4 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 15.7 GB/s. It supports RAM running at up to 7467 MHz (DDR5-5600, LPDDR5-7467, LPDDR5x-7467, to be specific - which is about as good as what 8040 series Ryzen chips have). Naturally, the chip features built-in Thunderbolt 4 support and Intel CNVi Wi-Fi support; fascinatingly enough, Intel chose to keep native SATA III support that AMD had removed from its Ryzen processors quite a while ago.

The 155H is compatible with 64-bit Windows 10, 64-bit Windows 11 and with many Linux distros.

Performance

If one chooses to trust the official performance data published by Intel, then the 155H is about as fast as the Ryzen 9 6900HX (Zen 3 Plus, 8 cores, 16 threads, up to 4.9 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This isn't a ground-breaking result but let's just wait for our in-house testing results instead of jumping to conclusions.

Either way, real-world performance of the chip may vary significantly depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of the system is.

Graphics

The 8-core Arc GPU running at up to 2.30 GHz is slated to be a proper alternative to the mighty Radeon 780M. The thing is almost as fast as the GTX 1650 (Laptop) and the RTX 2050 (Laptop) to represent some seriously solid performance gains over aging Xe-series integrated GPUs. If one chooses to take Intel's word for it, that is.

A proper DX12 Ultimate graphics adapter, the Arc is no stranger to ray tracing and other modern technologies including AI frame generation (XeSS). It will let you connect up to four SUHD 4320p monitors and it will both HW-encode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1 in a fast and efficient manner.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is. The latter is really important; Intel stresses that for the Arc to deliver the best results possible, multi-channel RAM configuration is a must.

Power consumption

This mighty Core Ultra 7 series processor has a Base power consumption of 28 W, while its Turbo power consumption is not supposed to exceed 115 W. Its Base power consumption is supposed to be around 64 W, however, most laptop makers will probably go for a higher value to get higher clock speeds and thus better performance. Either way, a powerful cooling solution will be needed to sort out this chip's hot temper.

The 155H is comprised of five small chips ("tiles") that are connected using Intel's Foveros technology. The tile containing main CPU cores is produced on the fairly modern 7 nm Intel process marketed as Intel 4 while most other tiles (the iGPU, the I/O die, ...) are built with TSMC's N5 and N6 processes. The base tile is built with the old Intel 22FFL process.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 5 135HIntel Core Ultra 7 155H
CodenameMeteor Lake-HMeteor Lake-H
SeriesIntel Meteor Lake-HIntel Meteor Lake-H
Series: Meteor Lake-H Meteor Lake-H
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H « 3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H compare3.8 - 5 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H « 3.8 - 4.8 GHz16 / 22 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 135H3.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare3.6 - 4.5 GHz14 / 18 cores18 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4600 MHz3800 - 4800 MHz
L3 Cache18 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 18 4.6 GHz
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x Intel Crestmont E-Core
16 / 22
6 x 4.8 GHz Intel Redwood Cove P-Core
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
2 x 2.5 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology7 nm7 nm
max. Temp.110 °C110 °C
SocketBGA2049BGA2049
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Enerp., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHADDR5-5600/LPDDR5-7467/LPDDR5x-7467 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Director, DL Boost, AI Boost, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNI, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2200 MHz)Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ( - 2250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 7 155H
37.5 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
99.2 Points (56%)
min: 96     avg: 102.7     median: 102.3 (57%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
575 Points (11%)
min: 323     avg: 776     median: 789 (15%)     max: 1024 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10951     avg: 11876     median: 11875.5 (11%)     max: 12800 Points
min: 9769     avg: 14965     median: 15028 (14%)     max: 19007 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1672     avg: 1700     median: 1700 (72%)     max: 1728 Points
min: 1496     avg: 1726     median: 1743 (74%)     max: 1815 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
652 Points (72%)
min: 601     avg: 665     median: 670.5 (74%)     max: 696 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4228 Points (10%)
min: 3798     avg: 5795     median: 5762.5 (14%)     max: 7409 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1718 Points (11%)
min: 1932     avg: 2449     median: 2450 (15%)     max: 2880 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
244 Points (69%)
min: 99.6     avg: 249.5     median: 255 (72%)     max: 268 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 27.11     avg: 30.5     median: 30.7 (40%)     max: 33.49 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.77     avg: 3     median: 3 (72%)     max: 3.13 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9317 Points (56%)
min: 8808     avg: 9492     median: 9619.5 (58%)     max: 9919 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
42283 Points (31%)
min: 50589     avg: 56540     median: 57550 (42%)     max: 60472 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 13726     avg: 67393     median: 80420 (51%)     max: 95005 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12270     avg: 30347     median: 13508.5 (16%)     max: 82102 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
506 s (6%)
min: 92.544     avg: 146.2     median: 139.6 (2%)     max: 206.526 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.7 s (1%)
min: 3.523     avg: 3.8     median: 3.7 (1%)     max: 4.041 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
482 s (2%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
3.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 6137     avg: 6921     median: 6911.5 (11%)     max: 7723 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4839 MIPS (57%)
min: 4594     avg: 5330     median: 5398 (64%)     max: 5621 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 41739     avg: 59108     median: 60595 (35%)     max: 70254 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
98 fps (33%)
min: 120.65     avg: 136.4     median: 135.4 (45%)     max: 154.15 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
271.5 fps (63%)
min: 282.57     avg: 302.1     median: 300.5 (69%)     max: 325 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12.5 fps (22%)
min: 9.93     avg: 16.5     median: 16.7 (29%)     max: 21.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
min: 0.944     avg: 1     median: 1 (29%)     max: 1.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.3 GB/s (22%)
min: 1.6     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (29%)     max: 1.7 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.3 GB/s (19%)
min: 9.3     avg: 10.3     median: 10.4 (27%)     max: 10.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
542 Seconds (7%)
min: 296     avg: 413.3     median: 380 (5%)     max: 692 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
338 Seconds (2%)
min: 175     avg: 232.5     median: 220 (2%)     max: 381 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.53 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12383 Points (26%)
min: 12066     avg: 12936     median: 12712.5 (27%)     max: 14729 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.4 s (2%)
min: 7.046     avg: 7.4     median: 7.2 (2%)     max: 8.087 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 15.701     avg: 16.2     median: 15.9 (1%)     max: 17.277 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
457.8 s (2%)
min: 394.754     avg: 413.2     median: 400.3 (2%)     max: 444.482 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 61131     avg: 65940     median: 63514 (49%)     max: 74620 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14970 Points (37%)
min: 6531     avg: 18376     median: 19092.5 (48%)     max: 23779 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
76741 Points (62%)
min: 53255     avg: 77249     median: 77292.5 (63%)     max: 93608 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 66925     avg: 75901     median: 72861.5 (59%)     max: 90957 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 84880     avg: 88438     median: 88437.5 (73%)     max: 91995 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
13970 Points (35%)
min: 7073     avg: 15332     median: 15194 (38%)     max: 19549 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
19468 Points (35%)
min: 5249     avg: 22618     median: 23177 (41%)     max: 28337 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7281 Points (31%)
min: 3922     avg: 9000     median: 9454.5 (40%)     max: 12145 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2257     avg: 2278     median: 2278 (57%)     max: 2299 Points
min: 1901     avg: 2377     median: 2409 (60%)     max: 2473 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 10077     avg: 10368     median: 10368 (40%)     max: 10659 Points
min: 7732     avg: 12275     median: 12385 (48%)     max: 13656 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2167     avg: 2588     median: 2313 (73%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 10787     avg: 15361     median: 12061 (50%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1640     avg: 1652     median: 1651.5 (65%)     max: 1663 Points
min: 1462     avg: 1751     median: 1761.5 (69%)     max: 1824 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8637     avg: 9226     median: 9225.5 (17%)     max: 9814 Points
min: 10017     avg: 12016     median: 12183.5 (22%)     max: 13556 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1556     avg: 1678     median: 1696 (7%)     max: 1745 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11112     avg: 11906     median: 12025 (38%)     max: 12530 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
6693 Points (67%)
min: 6559     avg: 6879     median: 6927 (69%)     max: 7141 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
32577 Points (32%)
min: 39509     avg: 43123     median: 43897 (44%)     max: 46412 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
571 ms (1%)
min: 416.4     avg: 541     median: 535 (1%)     max: 642 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
57.2 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
92150 Points (71%)
min: 77142     avg: 88549     median: 89268 (69%)     max: 97162 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
234 Points (64%)
min: 166.4     avg: 251.8     median: 255 (70%)     max: 309 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
264 Points (47%)
min: 213     avg: 276.5     median: 278.5 (50%)     max: 299 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1465 Points (55%)
min: 1366     avg: 1663     median: 1685.5 (63%)     max: 1903 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
52.9 Watt (9%)
min: 37.1     avg: 74.8     median: 72.8 (13%)     max: 168 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
53.4 Watt (10%)
min: 46.9     avg: 89.4     median: 87.9 (16%)     max: 160.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
14.5 Watt (10%)
min: 2.42     avg: 7.2     median: 6.1 (4%)     max: 24.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 2.83     avg: 10.1     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 90.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
32.2 Points per Watt (24%)
min: 17.7     avg: 30.9     median: 28.6 (21%)     max: 64.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 135H → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 155H → 125% n=41

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 12:37:01

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16909 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16906 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:16:39 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16909 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 16909 +0.005s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16906 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 16906 +0.057s ... 0.073s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.061s ... 0.134s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.136s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)