Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

Intel Core 2 Duo T6670

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2.2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet. Im Unterschied zum C2D T6600, bietet der T6670 Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x und eine höhere maximale Temperatur von 105°C. Dadurch eignet er sich eher für Business Notebooks.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T6670 passt in den Socket P (PGA478)

 

Intel Core 2 Duo P8400

► remove from comparison Intel P8400

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Im Vergleich zu den stärkeren Modellen bietet, der P8400 zwar nur die Hälfte an Level 2 Cache, jedoch bleibt dadurch der Stromverbrauch mit maximal 25 Watt auch geringer. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Der P8400 ist sehr ähnlich zu der OEM Version Core 2 Duo P7550, welcher später auf den Markt kam.

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 ausreichen. Im Vergleich zu AMD sollte die Performance auf Niveau der schnellsten Turion II Ultra mit 2.4 - 2.6 GHz liegen. Anspruchsvolle Spielefans sollten jedoch eher zu höher getakteten Core 2 Duo CPUs greifen (>2.5 GHz).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo P8400 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

► remove from comparison Intel T9600

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 Dual-Core CPU ist ein High-End Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zum schnelleren T9900 unterstützt er jedoch noch nicht den C1E State. Der neuere Core 2 Duo P9700 bietet die selben Leistungsdaten, jedoch bei deutlich geringerem Stromverbrauch (28 W versus 35 Watt TDP).

Dank der relativ hohen Taktung von 2.8 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen geschlagen (da Spiele aus 2009 meist nicht mehr als 2 Kerne auslasten).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T6670Intel Core 2 Duo P8400Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 « 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 « 2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 « 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2200 MHz2260 MHz2800 MHz
FSB80010661066
L2 Cache2 MB3 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt25 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm45 nm45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478Socket PSocket P (BGA479, PGA478)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB
Voltage1.05-1.15 V1.05-1.2125 V V
FeaturesSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
$209 U.S.$316 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2352     avg: 2365     median: 2365 (14%)     max: 2378 Points
min: 2418     avg: 2526.9     median: 2497 (15%)     max: 2882 Points
min: 3060     avg: 3203.5     median: 3106.5 (19%)     max: 3541 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4428     avg: 4434     median: 4430 (3%)     max: 4444 Points
min: 4507     avg: 4700.6     median: 4630 (3%)     max: 5314 Points
min: 5538     avg: 5936     median: 5801 (4%)     max: 6785 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 2196     avg: 2196     median: 2196 (104%)     max: 2103.1 s
min: 877     avg: 899.5     median: 899.5 (43%)     max: 922 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 34.97     avg: 52     median: 52 (82%)     max: 63.4 s
34.2 s (54%)
min: 27     avg: 28.1     median: 27.7 (44%)     max: 29.7 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1850 Points (4%)
min: 1922     avg: 2030     median: 2036 (4%)     max: 2084 Points
min: 2465     avg: 2524.3     median: 2517 (5%)     max: 2598 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23.87     avg: 33.4     median: 33.4 (101%)     max: 33.155 s
min: 21.75     avg: 22.1     median: 22 (66%)     max: 22.71 s
min: 16     avg: 16.3     median: 16 (48%)     max: 16.98 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 101     avg: 101     median: 101 (129%)     max: 78 s
min: 50.7     avg: 51.5     median: 51.8 (66%)     max: 52.2 s
min: 39     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (51%)     max: 40.98 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2241     avg: 2241     median: 2241 (116%)     max: 1931 s
1212 s (63%)
min: 1033     avg: 1051.7     median: 1034 (54%)     max: 1088 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
11254 MIPS (5%)
21204 MIPS (10%)
min: 25986     avg: 26073.5     median: 26073.5 (12%)     max: 26161 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
8839 MFLOPS (7%)
15993 MFLOPS (12%)
min: 19701     avg: 20126.5     median: 20126.5 (15%)     max: 20552 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4384     avg: 4566.7     median: 4559 (9%)     max: 4757 Points
min: 3410     avg: 5116.6     median: 5201.5 (11%)     max: 6255 Points
min: 5911     avg: 6760.7     median: 6798 (14%)     max: 7573 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
5.6 Points (72%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 3518     avg: 4111     median: 4340 (3%)     max: 4475 Points
min: 5700     avg: 5703     median: 5703 (4%)     max: 5706 Points
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
Errors [Close]

#0 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 69.1>63.4 for benchmark 50, setting:203 +0s ... 0.055s

#1 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 43>33.155 for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.061s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 101>78 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.065s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2241>1931 for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.068s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5.2> for benchmark 20, setting:114 +0s ... 0.075s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5.6> for benchmark 20, setting:114 +0s ... 0.076s

log 07. 05:19:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 467 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 398 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 07 Jun 2025 05:19:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 467 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 467 +0.006s ... 0.01s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 398 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#11 got single benchmarks 398 +0.023s ... 0.033s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0.001s ... 0.034s

#13 got single benchmarks 397 +0.008s ... 0.042s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.043s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.045s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.047s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.048s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.05s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.051s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.052s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.053s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.055s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.056s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.057s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.058s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.059s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.06s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.061s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.063s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.064s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.065s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.066s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.067s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.068s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.069s

#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.07s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.071s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.071s

#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.072s

#41 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.073s

#42 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.073s

#43 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.074s

#44 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.074s

#45 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.075s

#46 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.075s

#47 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.075s

#48 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.076s

#49 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.076s

#50 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.077s

#51 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.078s

#52 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.078s

#53 return log +0s ... 0.078s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)