Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA T1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q

NVIDIA T1000

► remove from comparison

The Nvidia T1000 is a professional desktop graphics card for small entry-level workstations. It is based on the same TU117 Turing chip as the consumer GeForce GTX1650. The number of shader units is also identical at 896. With 8 GB VRAM, the Nvidia T1000 however offers more VRAM, which is still connected via a 128 bit memory bus. The power consumption of the Nvidia T1000 is only rated at 50 watts and therefore does not require an additional power connection.

The professional graphics cards offer certified drivers which are optimized for stability and performance in professional applications (CAD, DCC, medical, prospecting, visualization applications). As a result, the performance in these areas is significantly better compared to consumer graphics cards with the same chip.

In contrast to the more powerful RTX cards (e.g. Quadro RTX 3000), they do not offer ray tracing and tensor cores. The Turing architecture has also seen significant improvements at the CUDA core level. Float and INT operations can now be executed simultaneously, the cache has been standardized and improved and adaptive shading has been introduced. As a result, Nvidia claims up to 50% higher performance per core compared to Pascal.

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q

The Nvidia Quadro T1000 with Max-Q Design is a professional mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU117 chip). Compared to the consumer GTX 1650, the Quadro T1000 features less CUDA cores / shaders (768 versus 896). The chip is manufactured in 12nm FinFET at TSMC. Compared to the normal Quadro T1000, the Max-Q variants are clocked lower and work in a more efficient state. Currently, we know of two variants with different clock speeds and power consumptions (35 and 40 W).

ModelShaderTGP (W)Base (MHz)Boost (MHz)
Quadro T1000 Mobile7685013951455
Quadro T1000 Max-Q7684012301455
Quadro T1000 Max-Q768357951455
Quadro T2000 Mobile10246015751785
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile8965013951560

The Quadro T1000 is a mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU116 chip). Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. RTX 2060), the T1000 integrates no Raytracing or Tensor cores. Due to the same boost clock as the mobile T1000, the Max-Q variants can perform similar with sufficient cooling.

The Turing generation did not only introduce raytracing for the RTX cards, but also optimized the architecture of the cores and caches. According to Nvidia the CUDA cores offer now a concurrent execution of floating point and integer operations for increased performance in compute-heavy workloads of modern games. Furthermore, the caches were reworked (new unified memory architecture with twice the cache compared to Pascal). This leads to up to 50% more instructions per clock and a 40% more power efficient usage compared to Pascal.

Thanks to the low power consumption, the Max-Q T2000 GPU can be used in thin and light laptops. The used TU116 chip is manufactured in 12nm FFN at TSMC.

NVIDIA T1000NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro Turing Series
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000 896 @ 1.07 - 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000 896 @ 1.07 - 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
ArchitectureTuringTuring
Pipelines896 - unified768 - unified
TMUs56
ROPs32
Core Speed1065 - 1395 (Boost) MHz795 / 1230 - 1455 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance5000 TFLOPS FP16, 2500 TFLOPS FP32, 0.7812 TFLOPS FP64
Memory Speed10000 effective = 1250 MHz8000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR6GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory8 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynono
Memory Bandwidth160 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 6.8, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption50 Watt35 - 40 Watt
Transistors4.7 Billion
Die Size 200 mm²
technology12 nm12 nm
PCIe3.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 1.4a
Date of Announcement06.05.2021 27.05.2019
CodenameN19P-Q1
Notebook Sizemedium sized

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T1000
3.2 pt (9%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
100%
1 T1000 +
3534 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
3088 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
398761 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
179865 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
100%
1 T1000 +
37881 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
50553 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
100%
1 T1000 +
8124 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
8450 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
100%
1 T1000 +
237130 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
100%
1 T1000 +
34584 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
100%
1 T1000 +
41157 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
100%
1 T1000 +
12953 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
11793 Points (9%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
100%
1 T1000 +
46318 Points (13%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
100%
1 T1000 +
39668 Points (22%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T1000 +
78565 Points (86%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark 06
100%
1 T1000 +
58968 Points (77%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
100%
1 T1000 +
42.2 fps (13%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (24%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (59%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
39.3 fps (11%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
18.1 fps (3%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
78.1 fps (27%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
37.3 fps (18%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
44 fps (12%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
13.4 fps (9%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
62.8 fps (9%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
9.5 fps (1%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
43.3 fps (19%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
21.9 fps (14%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
27.4 fps (9%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
100%
1 T1000 +
6837 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
100%
1 T1000 +
252.5 fps (83%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
100%
1 T1000 +
335.8 fps (20%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
100%
1 T1000 +
99.6 % (100%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
100%
1 T1000 +
386 fps (9%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
100%
1 T1000 +
31.9 fps (6%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
100%
1 T1000 +
38611 Points (10%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
100%
1 T1000 +
36031 Points (9%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
1987 Samples/s (7%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
100%
1 T1000 +
4129 Samples/s (7%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
100%
1 T1000 +
6369 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
101.9 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
156.8 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
100%
1 T1000 +
0.1 fps per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T1000 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
98.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
82.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
58.8  fps
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
22  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
19  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
15  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
10  fps
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
138.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
90.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
50.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
39.8  fps
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
44  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
40  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
38  fps
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
45.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
34.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
28.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
23.8  fps
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
45  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
35.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
30.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
29.5  fps
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
108.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
96.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
63.6  fps
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
69.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
55.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
35.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
27.6  fps
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
125.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
91.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
69.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
49.7  fps
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
51.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
42.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
33.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
21.4  fps
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
110.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
56.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
47.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
40.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
151  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
60  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
38.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
28.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
195.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
60  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
37.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
24.1  fps
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
117  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
62  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
58  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
53  fps
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
102.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
33  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
26.1  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
226  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
87.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
69.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
59.9  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
127  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
62  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
57  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
53  fps
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
211  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
145.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
130.1  fps
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
101.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
49.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
36.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
246.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
T1000:
217.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
150.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
136.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
T1000:
188.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
T1000:
113.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
63.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
35.2  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
100%
T1000:
187.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
T1000:
187.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
103.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
50.2  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA T1000 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA T1000NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2498.482.658.8
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora22191510
Total War Pharaoh138.690.850.639.8
Assassin's Creed Mirage444038
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty45.134.228.323.8
Baldur's Gate 34535.230.229.5
F1 23108.396.563.6
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands69.255.635.327.6
GRID Legends125.491.369.649.7
God of War51.842.533.521.4
Far Cry 6110.456.947.440.3
Borderlands 31516038.228.6
Total War: Three Kingdoms195.96037.324.1
Far Cry New Dawn117625853
Metro Exodus102.345.93326.1
Strange Brigade22687.269.459.9
Far Cry 5127625753
X-Plane 11.11211145.8130.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark101.349.336.2
Dota 2 Reborn246.2217.7150.4136.5
The Witcher 3188.8113.863.935.2
GTA V187.4187.1103.550.2
NVIDIA T1000NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4
7
10
1
8
10
3
2
13
5
2
8
8

1






< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 25. 15:58:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12782 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9888 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Apr 2025 05:16:28 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.006s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12782 +0.018s ... 0.024s

#9 got single benchmarks 12782 +0.005s ... 0.028s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9888 +0s ... 0.029s

#11 got single benchmarks 9888 +0.003s ... 0.031s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.05s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.05s

#15 Got 83 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.054s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.054s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.056s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.063s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.063s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.065s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)