Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X1-26-100

The 8-core Snapdragon X (X1-26-100) is an affordable ARM architecture processor for use in Windows laptops. Unveiled in Jan 2025, this Qualcomm SoC features 8 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 2.98 GHz, along with the 1.7 TFLOPS X1-45 iGPU and the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU. The super-fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller, USB 4.0 support, TB 4 support and PCIe 4 support are all onboard as well.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (2 clusters of essentially identical cores; 8 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 (with no eGPU support).

The X1-26-100 is based on the smaller die codenamed Purwa, unlike most X Elite and some X Plus processors. It is believed to have at least 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5x-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

The CPU should be about 10% slower than its faster brother named X1P-42 due to the latter's higher CPU clock speeds. Generally speaking, a performance level similar to recent U-class Intel Core 5 chips is to be expected.

Graphics

The X1-45 used here delivers up to 1.7 TFLOPS of performance. Unlike the much faster 3.8 TFLOPS and 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPUs, this little guy here has much fewer unified shaders and runs at lower clock speeds, too. Games put it a little behind the GeForce MX350; this kind of performance is sufficient for older games and sub-900p resolutions only.

AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded whereas with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p.

Power consumption

Expect to see anything between 15 W and 30 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and the power profile chosen. The number includes RAM power consumption.

The SoC is built with TSMC's N4P process for decent power efficiency, as of H1 2025.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Elite X1E-84-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. As the second-fastest X Elite chip in September 2024, the X1E-84-100 has 12 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 4.2 GHz, along with the 4.6 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller delivering over 100 GB/s of throughput. USB 4.0, TB 4 and PCIe 4 are all onboard, too.

Two slower Snapdragon X Elite flavors exist, known as the X1E-80-100 and X1E-78-100. In the meantime, the X1E-00-1DE is a special version of the X1E-84-100 aimed at system makers and software developers that has just slightly higher single-core and dual-core Boost clock speeds of 4.3 GHz but otherwise the same CPU/GPU/NPU configuration.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (3 clusters of essentially identical cores; 12 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and they reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 however it does not appear to support eGPUs as of September 2024.

Like most X Elite and X Plus processors, the X1E-84-100 is based on the larger die codenamed Hamoa. The processor is believed to have at least 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

When all of the 12 cores are under load, they run at up to 3.8 GHz. The 4.2 GHz clock speed is only achievable under single-thread or dual-thread loads.

If the Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 review is any indication, the Snapdragon is almost as fast as the Core Ultra 7 155H in applications compiled for ARM while being up to 30% slower when executing x86 code.

A lot depends on how high the power limits of the system are, and how competent its cooling solution is.

Graphics

The 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPU has 1,536 unified shaders running at up to 1,500 MHz. It is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) based on the significantly older Adreno 730 iGPU, rendering the X1-85 DX12-compatible but not DX12 Ultimate-compatible. AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded; with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p rather than SUHD 4320p.

Its gaming performance is in many use cases almost as good as the Intel Arc 8 for reasonably playable experience in many 2023 and 2024 games such as Baldur's Gate 3 at 1080p on low graphics settings.

Power consumption

An X1E-84-100 can eat up to 80 watts depending on the system and the power profile chosen. This will differ from one laptop to another, with most designs expected to target the ~45 W sweet spot. The Samsung laptop that we finished testing in early September certainly does.

It must be said that the power consumption figures include RAM, unlike it is with most Intel and AMD chips.

The Qualcomm SoC is built with the TSMC N4P process for better-than-average, as of H2 2024, energy efficiency.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Plus X1P-42-100

The Snapdragon X Plus 8-core (X1P-42-100) is a relatively affordable ARM architecture processor for use in Windows laptops that was unveiled in Sep 2024. This Qualcomm SoC features 8 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 3.4 GHz, along with the 1.7 TFLOPS X1-45 iGPU and the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU. The super-fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller, USB 4.0 support, TB 4 support and PCIe 4 support are all onboard as well.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (2 clusters of essentially identical cores; 8 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and they reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 however it does not appear to support eGPUs as of September 2024.

The X1P-42-100 is based on the smaller die codenamed Purwa, unlike most X Elite and X Plus processors. It is believed to have at least 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5x-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

A lot depends on the power targets of a specific system, just like it is with AMD, Intel and Nvidia products. That being said, the average X1P-42-100 competes with older chips such as the Core i5-1245U when executing multi-threaded x86 code. With apps compiled specifically with Windows on ARM in mind, a Core i7-1360P-like performance level is to be expected which is not bad at all for what is supposed to be a budget CPU.

The 3.4 GHz clock speed is only achievable in single-thread workloads. When under multi-threaded load, the CPU cores will run at no more than 3.2 GHz.

Graphics

The X1-45 used here delivers up to 1.7 TFLOPS of performance. Unlike the much faster 3.8 TFLOPS and 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPUs, this little guy here has much fewer unified shaders and runs at lower clock speeds, too. Games put it a little behind the GeForce MX350; this kind of performance is sufficient for older games and sub-900p resolutions only.

AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded whereas with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p.

Power consumption

Expect to see anything between 15 W and 30 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and the power profile chosen. The number includes RAM.

The SoC is built with TSMC's N4P process for better-than-average power efficiency, as of H2 2024.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
CodenameOryonOryonOryon
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon XQualcomm Snapdragon XQualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 « - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 « 3.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 « - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Clock <=2980 MHz3800 - 4200 MHz <=3400 MHz
L1 Cache2.3 MB2.3 MB2.3 MB
L2 Cache12 MB12 MB12 MB
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
8 x 3.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
12 / 12
12 x 4.2 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
8 / 8
8 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
iGPUQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPSQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com
TDP Turbo PL280 Watt
TDP30 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X1-26-100
28 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Elite X1E-84-100
34.6 pt (58%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Plus X1P-42-100
30.3 pt (50%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
96 Points (54%)
min: 124     avg: 128.3     median: 128 (72%)     max: 133 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 646     avg: 672     median: 672 (13%)     max: 698 Points
min: 866     avg: 1007     median: 970 (18%)     max: 1220 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 6897     avg: 7172     median: 7171.5 (7%)     max: 7446 Points
9471 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 975     avg: 977     median: 976.5 (42%)     max: 978 Points
1350 Points (57%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 359     avg: 362.5     median: 362.5 (40%)     max: 366 Points
511 Points (57%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2644     avg: 2743     median: 2743 (7%)     max: 2842 Points
3561 Points (9%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1338     avg: 1371     median: 1371 (9%)     max: 1404 Points
1946 Points (12%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 181.5     avg: 183.8     median: 183.8 (52%)     max: 186 Points
252 Points (71%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.8 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.9 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2299 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
14395 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
308.5 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
9.5 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9297 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 29312     avg: 29610     median: 29609.5 (17%)     max: 29907 MIPS
41410 MIPS (24%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4088     avg: 4095     median: 4095 (48%)     max: 4102 MIPS
5521 MIPS (65%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.44     avg: 5     median: 5 (9%)     max: 5.52 fps
6.8 fps (12%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 791     avg: 821     median: 821 (10%)     max: 851 Seconds
619 Seconds (8%)
min: 711     avg: 839     median: 807 (10%)     max: 1055 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 440     avg: 458.5     median: 458.5 (3%)     max: 477 Seconds
353 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.861     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 0.888 sec
0.6 sec (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
20 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
43.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
995 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
27727 Points (21%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11816     avg: 11947     median: 11946.5 (29%)     max: 12077 Points
13195 Points (32%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 8737     avg: 8919     median: 8996 (23%)     max: 9024 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 12446     avg: 12499     median: 12498.5 (22%)     max: 12551 Points
15454 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5659 Points (24%)
4847 Points (20%)
min: 3282     avg: 3292     median: 3288 (14%)     max: 3306 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2070     avg: 2106     median: 2121 (53%)     max: 2126 Points
min: 2777     avg: 2882     median: 2892 (72%)     max: 2966 Points
min: 2353     avg: 2394     median: 2393.5 (60%)     max: 2437 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 10492     avg: 10553     median: 10550 (41%)     max: 10618 Points
min: 14056     avg: 15136     median: 15412 (60%)     max: 15665 Points
min: 10833     avg: 11313     median: 11400 (44%)     max: 11508 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1486     avg: 1531     median: 1531 (60%)     max: 1576 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4457     avg: 5351     median: 5350.5 (10%)     max: 6244 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 518.4     avg: 520     median: 519.5 (1%)     max: 520.6 ms
381.2 ms (0%)
min: 467.8     avg: 729     median: 481 (1%)     max: 1145 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 65692     avg: 68056     median: 68055.5 (52%)     max: 70419 Points
94348 Points (72%)
min: 79431     avg: 79536     median: 79536 (61%)     max: 79641 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 248     avg: 248.5     median: 248.5 (68%)     max: 249 Points
334 Points (92%)
min: 130.3     avg: 249.5     median: 280 (77%)     max: 284 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 353     avg: 355     median: 355 (64%)     max: 357 Points
476 Points (85%)
min: 129.9     avg: 353.8     median: 405 (73%)     max: 426 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1093     avg: 1104     median: 1103.5 (41%)     max: 1114 Points
1416 Points (53%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59 Watt (10%)
min: 33.6     avg: 46.3     median: 46.7 (8%)     max: 58.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41.4     avg: 44.1     median: 44.1 (8%)     max: 46.8 Watt
50.2 Watt (9%)
min: 50.3     avg: 53.7     median: 52.3 (10%)     max: 60.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.25     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (3%)     max: 4.99 Watt
3.9 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.16     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (5%)     max: 4.72 Watt
4.7 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 28.6     avg: 31.3     median: 31.3 (23%)     max: 33.9 Points per Watt
38.8 Points per Watt (29%)
min: 25.9     avg: 27.2     median: 27.2 (20%)     max: 28.6 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 → 133% n=24

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 → 107% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 18. 20:15:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18623 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15108 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 17591 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 16 May 2025 05:18:06 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18623 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 18623 +0.006s ... 0.02s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 15108 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#11 got single benchmarks 15108 +0.005s ... 0.029s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17591 +0.004s ... 0.033s

#13 got single benchmarks 17591 +0.008s ... 0.041s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.087s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.087s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)