Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100

Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X1-26-100

The 8-core Snapdragon X (X1-26-100) is an affordable ARM architecture processor for use in Windows laptops. Unveiled in Jan 2025, this Qualcomm SoC features 8 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 2.98 GHz, along with the 1.7 TFLOPS X1-45 iGPU and the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU. The super-fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller, USB 4.0 support, TB 4 support and PCIe 4 support are all onboard as well.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (2 clusters of essentially identical cores; 8 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 (with no eGPU support).

The X1-26-100 is based on the smaller die codenamed Purwa, unlike most X Elite and some X Plus processors. It is believed to have at least 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5x-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

The CPU should be about 10% slower than its faster brother named X1P-42 due to the latter's higher CPU clock speeds. Generally speaking, a performance level similar to recent U-class Intel Core 5 chips is to be expected.

Graphics

The X1-45 used here delivers up to 1.7 TFLOPS of performance. Unlike the much faster 3.8 TFLOPS and 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPUs, this little guy here has much fewer unified shaders and runs at lower clock speeds, too. Games put it a little behind the GeForce MX350; this kind of performance is sufficient for older games and sub-900p resolutions only.

AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded whereas with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p.

Power consumption

Expect to see anything between 15 W and 30 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and the power profile chosen. The number includes RAM power consumption.

The SoC is built with TSMC's N4P process for decent power efficiency, as of H1 2025.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Elite X1E-78-100

The Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 is a pretty fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops. The X1E-78-100 is the least powerful member of the Snapdragon X Elite processor series, as of May 2024; as such, it has 12 Oryon CPU cores (3 clusters of equally powerful cores; 12 threads) running at no more than 3.4 GHz. Other key features include the 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 iGPU, the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and an impressively fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller.

The top dog, known as the Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100, is thought to be based on the same die with the same NPU but with higher GPU clock speeds, higher CPU clock speeds and possibly higher power targets as well.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are in part based on Nuvia IP; they most likely make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 but it remains to be seen if the X Elite is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The SoC is said to have 12 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5X-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

Our first benchmarks (featuring a 35 W X Elite X1E-78-100) revealed very decent CPU performance figures that see the X Elite going head-to-head with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U. It's also not much faster or slower than the Apple M3 chip with 10 GPU cores. While not groundbreaking, this should be good enough for the user to be able to run any applications in 2024 and 2025.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors. If making use of the built-in x86 to ARM emulation mode, a performance penalty of about 20% is to be expected.

Graphics

The integrated 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno X1-85 GPU is DirectX 12-enabled but not DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled, despite featuring VRS and ray tracing support. The 3.8 TFLOPS of performance that it supposedly delivers pale in comparison to the slowest current-generation professional Nvidia Ada graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, that's good for up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

Its gaming performance is rather underwhelming according to our in-house testing results. While slightly faster than the aging Iris Xe (96 EUs), the Adreno fails to outgun the Radeon 780M meaning there is little point in comparing it with full-fat discrete graphics cards. Baldur's Gate 3, a triple-A title released in 2023, is pretty much unplayable at 1080p / Low. GTA V, a game that saw the light of day in 2015, is playable at 1080p / High.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding). The hardware does not support the VVC codec; that feature remains a Lunar Lake exclusive for now.

Power consumption

The X1E-78-100 is set to be slightly less power-hungry than its more powerful brothers. Expect to see anything between 20 W and 45 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and on the performance profile chosen. That's exactly what Ryzen HS chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD X Plus X1P-46-100

The Snapdragon X Plus 8-core (X1P-46-100) is a relatively affordable ARM architecture processor for use in Windows laptops that was unveiled in Sep 2024. This Qualcomm SoC features 8 Oryon CPU cores running at up to 4.0 GHz, along with the 2.1 TFLOPS X1-45 iGPU and the 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU. The super-fast LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller, USB 4.0 support, TB 4 support and PCIe 4 support are all onboard as well.

Architecture and Features

The Oryon cores (2 clusters of essentially identical cores; 8 threads) are mostly based on Nuvia IP and they reportedly make use of the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4 however it does not appear to support eGPUs as of September 2024.

The X1P-46-100 is based on the smaller die codenamed Purwa, unlike most X Elite and X Plus processors. It is believed to have at least 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; furthermore, most laptops built around the chip are expected to have 16 GB of LPDDR5x-8448 RAM. There is also a 45 TOPS NPU present for accelerating AI workloads.

Performance

A lot depends on the power targets of a specific system, just like it is with AMD, Intel and Nvidia products. That being said, we fully expect the X1P-46-100 to be just a little faster than the Core i5-1245U when executing multi-threaded x86 code.

The 4.0 GHz clock speed is only achievable in single-thread workloads. When executing multi-threaded tasks, the CPU cores will run at no more than 3.4 GHz.

Graphics

The X1-45 used here delivers up to 2.1 TFLOPS of performance. Unlike the much faster 3.8 TFLOPS and 4.6 TFLOPS X1-85 iGPUs, this little graphics adapter has much fewer unified shaders at its disposal. Its gaming performance is set to be sufficient for pre-2021 games at resolutions such as 1600x900 on low graphics settings.

AVC, HEVC and AV1 video codecs can be both hardware-decoded and hardware-encoded whereas with VP9, only decoding is possible. The highest monitor resolution supported is UHD 2160p.

Power consumption

Expect to see anything between 15 W and 30 W under long-term workloads depending on the system and the power profile chosen. The number includes RAM.

The SoC is built with TSMC's N4P process for better-than-average power efficiency, as of H2 2024.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100
CodenameOryonOryonOryon
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon XQualcomm Snapdragon XQualcomm Snapdragon X
Series: Snapdragon X Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 « - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 « - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 « - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 - 2.98 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3 Oryon
Clock <=2980 MHz <=3400 MHz <=4000 MHz
L1 Cache2.3 MB2.3 MB2.3 MB
L2 Cache12 MB12 MB12 MB
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
8 x 3.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
12 / 12
8 x 3.4 GHz
4 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
8 / 8 4.0 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
iGPUQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPSQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com
TDP35 Watt30 Watt
TDP Turbo PL245 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X1-26-100
28 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Elite X1E-78-100
31.2 pt (52%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
96 Points (54%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 646     avg: 672     median: 672 (13%)     max: 698 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 6897     avg: 7172     median: 7171.5 (7%)     max: 7446 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 975     avg: 977     median: 976.5 (42%)     max: 978 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 359     avg: 362.5     median: 362.5 (40%)     max: 366 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2644     avg: 2743     median: 2743 (7%)     max: 2842 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1338     avg: 1371     median: 1371 (9%)     max: 1404 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 181.5     avg: 183.8     median: 183.8 (52%)     max: 186 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
14.8 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.9 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2299 Points (14%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
14395 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
308.5 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
9.5 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
9297 Points (15%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 29312     avg: 29610     median: 29609.5 (17%)     max: 29907 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4088     avg: 4095     median: 4095 (48%)     max: 4102 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.44     avg: 5     median: 5 (9%)     max: 5.52 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 791     avg: 821     median: 821 (10%)     max: 851 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 440     avg: 458.5     median: 458.5 (3%)     max: 477 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.861     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 0.888 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
20 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
43.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
995 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11816     avg: 11947     median: 11946.5 (29%)     max: 12077 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8244 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 12446     avg: 12499     median: 12498.5 (22%)     max: 12551 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
5659 Points (24%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2070     avg: 2106     median: 2121 (53%)     max: 2126 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 10492     avg: 10553     median: 10550 (41%)     max: 10618 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2175 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
12046 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1576     avg: 1679     median: 1666.5 (65%)     max: 1805 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6244     avg: 9624     median: 9104.5 (16%)     max: 14043 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 518.4     avg: 520     median: 519.5 (1%)     max: 520.6 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 65692     avg: 68056     median: 68055.5 (52%)     max: 70419 Points
min: 79579     avg: 80168     median: 80003 (61%)     max: 81088 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 248     avg: 248.5     median: 248.5 (68%)     max: 249 Points
min: 271     avg: 284.8     median: 285.5 (78%)     max: 297 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 353     avg: 355     median: 355 (64%)     max: 357 Points
min: 395     avg: 413.4     median: 419 (75%)     max: 423 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1093     avg: 1104     median: 1103.5 (41%)     max: 1114 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41.4     avg: 44.1     median: 44.1 (8%)     max: 46.8 Watt
min: 63     avg: 64.2     median: 64.2 (12%)     max: 65.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.25     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (3%)     max: 4.99 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.16     avg: 4.4     median: 4.4 (5%)     max: 4.72 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 28.6     avg: 31.3     median: 31.3 (23%)     max: 33.9 Points per Watt
34.9 Points per Watt (26%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 18. 06:29:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18623 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17587 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18002 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 16 May 2025 05:18:06 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18623 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 18623 +0.005s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 17587 +0.003s ... 0.02s

#11 got single benchmarks 17587 +0.009s ... 0.029s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18002 +0s ... 0.029s

#13 got single benchmarks 18002 +0s ... 0.029s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.058s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.058s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)