Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a powerful Strix Halo family processor that debuted in January 2025. The APU comes with 16 Zen 5 CPU cores running at up to 5.1 GHz, the 40 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 8060S graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Unlike its non-PRO sibling, the chip features AMD Secure Processor (an on-package ARM security co-processor), Windows Device Guard and AMD-Vi. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support and a whole lot of L3 cache.

Architecture and Features

Unlike Strix Point, Strix Halo parts are powered by Zen 5 cores - no Zen 5c here. It's not clear if this is the desktop Zen 5 implementation with full AVX512 throughput or the mobile one. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the AI Max+ PRO chip supports RAM as fast as LPDDR5x-8000, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors had. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

From leaks, we know that the Ryzen delivers around 20,700 Geekbench 6.3 Multi points, meaning it trades blow with very powerful desktop CPUs like the Ryzen 9 9900X.

Graphics

The Radeon 8060S is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer, as of Jan 2025. It features 40 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (2560 unified shaders) that could see it outcompeting lower mid-range desktop graphics cards like the GeForce RTX 4050. This GPU will undoubtedly run any game at 1080p on Ultra, however, the ultimate question is whether or not the cooling solution of the laptop will be powerful enough to let the iGPU shine.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The AI Max+ PRO 395 can eat up to 120 W depending on the system and its TDP power targets, with 45 W named as the minimum TDP.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of Jan 2025, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is a powerful Strix Halo family processor that debuted in January 2025. The APU comes equipped with 8 Zen 5 CPU cores running at up to 5.0 GHz, the 32 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 8050S graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Unlike its non-PRO sibling, the chip features AMD Secure Processor (an on-package ARM security co-processor), Windows Device Guard and AMD-Vi. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Architecture and Features

Unlike it is with Strix Point, Strix Halo parts are powered by Zen 5 cores - no Zen 5c here. It's not clear if this is the desktop Zen 5 implementation with full AVX512 throughput or the mobile one. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the AI Max PRO chip supports RAM as fast as LPDDR5x-8000, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads. The CPU's L3 cache is fairly large at 32 MB. That being said, the higher-end 390 and 395 AI Max PRO chips have twice the amount.

Performance

Its CPU performance should be about as good as the fastest Qualcomm Snapdragon X chips, like the X1E-84-100.

Graphics

The Radeon 8050S sports 32 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (2048 unified shaders) that could see it competing with entry-level and lower mid-range desktop graphics cards like the Radeon RX 7700 XT. This GPU will undoubtedly run any game at 1080p on Ultra, however, the ultimate question is whether or not the cooling solution of the laptop will be powerful enough to let the iGPU shine.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The AI Max PRO 385 can eat up to 120 W depending on the system and its TDP power targets, with 45 W named as the minimum TDP.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of Jan 2025, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
CodenameStrix Halo PROStrix Halo PRO
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)AMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Halo PRO
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 « 3 - 5.1 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 compare3.2 - 5 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 3853.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 3953 - 5.1 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 compare3.2 - 5 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 « 3.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 compare3.6 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3000 - 5100 MHz3600 - 5000 MHz
L2 Cache16 MB8 MB
L3 Cache64 MB32 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 32
16 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 / 16 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP55 Watt55 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
SocketFP11FP11
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ALPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 8060S ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon 8050S ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
45.4 pt (76%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 112.2     avg: 112.6     median: 112.6 (63%)     max: 113 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1643     avg: 1691     median: 1690.5 (31%)     max: 1738 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 30706     avg: 35061     median: 35061 (33%)     max: 39416 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2003     avg: 2013     median: 2012.5 (85%)     max: 2022 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 783     avg: 787     median: 787 (86%)     max: 791 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 11816     avg: 13429     median: 13428.5 (33%)     max: 15041 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4784     avg: 5247     median: 5247 (33%)     max: 5710 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 305     avg: 306     median: 306 (85%)     max: 307 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
62.9 Points (81%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (86%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8580 Points (52%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60278 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
108876 Points (70%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15953 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
31.8 s (0%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4649 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 109760     avg: 117149     median: 117148 (67%)     max: 124537 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5613     avg: 5998     median: 5998 (71%)     max: 6383 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
182.8 fps (61%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
316 fps (73%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 30.4     avg: 31.7     median: 31.7 (56%)     max: 33 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.6 GB/s (47%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.5 GB/s (43%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15.6 GB/s (41%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 132     avg: 145.5     median: 145.5 (2%)     max: 159 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 90     avg: 96     median: 96 (1%)     max: 102 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4027     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4127 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16509 Points (35%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.2 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
23.9 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
89313 Points (69%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 21268     avg: 23295     median: 23295 (57%)     max: 25322 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77244 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
79672 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 20971     avg: 21827     median: 21826.5 (55%)     max: 22682 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 29555     avg: 31057     median: 31057 (55%)     max: 32559 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9596     avg: 9831     median: 9831 (41%)     max: 10066 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2756     avg: 2824     median: 2823.5 (71%)     max: 2891 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 16503     avg: 16679     median: 16679 (65%)     max: 16855 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2071     avg: 2141     median: 2141 (84%)     max: 2211 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16565     avg: 17408     median: 17408 (31%)     max: 18251 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2072 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
16377 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8865 Points (89%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
65863 Points (66%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 428     avg: 430.5     median: 430.5 (1%)     max: 433 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 225     avg: 250     median: 250 (69%)     max: 275 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 275     avg: 304.5     median: 304.5 (55%)     max: 334 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1892     avg: 1909     median: 1909 (71%)     max: 1926 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 116.5     avg: 151.8     median: 151.8 (26%)     max: 187.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 115.3     avg: 170.7     median: 170.7 (31%)     max: 226 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.45     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (6%)     max: 9.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
7.2 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
25.3 Points per Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 23. 17:39:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18881 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18900 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:18:47 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18881 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 18881 +0.006s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18900 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 18900 +0s ... 0.014s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.043s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.045s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)