Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 vs AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is a powerful Strix Halo family processor that debuted in January 2025. The APU comes equipped with 6 Zen 5 CPU cores running at up to 4.9 GHz, the 16 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 8040S graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Like other AI 300 PRO chips, the 380 features AMD Secure Processor (an on-package ARM security co-processor), Windows Device Guard and AMD-Vi. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support.

Architecture and Features

Unlike it is with Strix Point, Strix Halo parts are powered by Zen 5 cores - no Zen 5c here. It's not clear if this is the desktop Zen 5 implementation with full AVX512 throughput or the mobile one. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the AI Max PRO chip supports RAM as fast as LPDDR5x-8000, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads. The CPU's L3 cache isn't anything to write home about at 16 MB. The 390 and 395 AI Max PRO chips have 4x the amount.

Performance

Its CPU performance should be about as good as older octa-core AMD Ryzen CPUs, like the Ryzen 9 6900HX.

Graphics

The Radeon 8040S sports 16 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) meaning its gaming prowess should just about match that of the Radeon 890M. The latter is the graphics solution employed by several Strix Point chips such as the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. Expect playable frame rates in most games at 1080p as long as you're fine with medium quality settings, or slightly lower.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The AI Max PRO 380 can eat up to 120 W depending on the system and its TDP power targets, with 45 W named as the minimum TDP.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of Jan 2025, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a powerful Strix Halo family processor that debuted in January 2025. The APU comes with 16 Zen 5 CPU cores running at up to 5.1 GHz, the 40 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 8060S graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Unlike its non-PRO sibling, the chip features AMD Secure Processor (an on-package ARM security co-processor), Windows Device Guard and AMD-Vi. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support and a whole lot of L3 cache.

Architecture and Features

Unlike Strix Point, Strix Halo parts are powered by Zen 5 cores - no Zen 5c here. It's not clear if this is the desktop Zen 5 implementation with full AVX512 throughput or the mobile one. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the AI Max+ PRO chip supports RAM as fast as LPDDR5x-8000, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors had. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

From leaks, we know that the Ryzen delivers around 20,700 Geekbench 6.3 Multi points, meaning it trades blow with very powerful desktop CPUs like the Ryzen 9 9900X.

Graphics

The Radeon 8060S is the most powerful iGPU that AMD has on offer, as of Jan 2025. It features 40 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (2560 unified shaders) that could see it outcompeting lower mid-range desktop graphics cards like the GeForce RTX 4050. This GPU will undoubtedly run any game at 1080p on Ultra, however, the ultimate question is whether or not the cooling solution of the laptop will be powerful enough to let the iGPU shine.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The AI Max+ PRO 395 can eat up to 120 W depending on the system and its TDP power targets, with 45 W named as the minimum TDP.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of Jan 2025, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is a powerful Strix Halo family processor that debuted in January 2025. The APU comes equipped with 12 Zen 5 CPU cores running at up to 5.0 GHz, the 32 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 8050S graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Unlike its non-PRO sibling, the chip features AMD Secure Processor (an on-package ARM security co-processor), Windows Device Guard and AMD-Vi. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support and a whole lot of L3 cache.

Architecture and Features

Unlike it is with Strix Point, Strix Halo parts are powered by Zen 5 cores - no Zen 5c here. It's not clear if this is the desktop Zen 5 implementation with full AVX512 throughput or the mobile one. According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the AI Max chip supports RAM as fast as LPDDR5x-8000, and is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

Performance

Its CPU performance should be about 10% higher than that of the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and HX 375 due to the AI Max PRO chip's higher TDP power target and lack of cut-down Zen 5c cores.

Graphics

The Radeon 8050S sports 32 RDNA 3+ architecture CUs (2048 unified shaders) that could see it competing with lower mid-range desktop graphics cards like the Radeon RX 7700 XT. This GPU will undoubtedly run any game at 1080p on Ultra, however, the ultimate question is whether or not the cooling solution of the laptop will be powerful enough to let the iGPU shine.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The AI Max PRO 390 can eat up to 120 W depending on the system and its TDP power targets, with 45 W named as the minimum TDP.

The 4 nm TSMC process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of Jan 2025, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
CodenameStrix Halo PROStrix Halo PROStrix Halo PRO
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)AMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)AMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Halo PRO
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 3953 - 5.1 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 3903.2 - 5 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 3853.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 « 3.6 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 « 3 - 5.1 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 3903.2 - 5 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 3853.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 3803.6 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 3953 - 5.1 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 « 3.2 - 5 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 3853.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 3803.6 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4900 MHz3000 - 5100 MHz3200 - 5000 MHz
L2 Cache6 MB16 MB12 MB
L3 Cache16 MB64 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 5
16 / 32
16 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
12 / 24
12 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP55 Watt55 Watt55 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
SocketFP11FP11FP11
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ALPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ALPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 8040S ( - 2800 MHz)AMD Radeon 8060S ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon 8050S ( - 2800 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
45.4 pt (76%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
43.4 pt (72%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 112.2     avg: 112.6     median: 112.6 (63%)     max: 113 Points
107.8 Points (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1643     avg: 1691     median: 1690.5 (31%)     max: 1738 Points
1316 Points (24%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 30706     avg: 35061     median: 35061 (33%)     max: 39416 Points
24828 Points (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2003     avg: 2013     median: 2012.5 (85%)     max: 2022 Points
1976 Points (83%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 783     avg: 787     median: 787 (86%)     max: 791 Points
774 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 11816     avg: 13429     median: 13428.5 (33%)     max: 15041 Points
9662 Points (24%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4784     avg: 5247     median: 5247 (33%)     max: 5710 Points
3918 Points (25%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 305     avg: 306     median: 306 (85%)     max: 307 Points
303 Points (84%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
62.9 Points (81%)
46.5 Points (60%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (86%)
3.6 Points (85%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8580 Points (52%)
8359 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60278 Points (44%)
53551 Points (39%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
108876 Points (70%)
98628 Points (63%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15953 Points (19%)
15548 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
31.8 s (0%)
288.4 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
6.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4649 Points (7%)
10249 Points (16%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 109760     avg: 117149     median: 117148 (67%)     max: 124537 MIPS
93236 MIPS (54%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5613     avg: 5998     median: 5998 (71%)     max: 6383 MIPS
6124 MIPS (72%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
182.8 fps (61%)
173.8 fps (58%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
316 fps (73%)
297.3 fps (69%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 30.4     avg: 31.7     median: 31.7 (56%)     max: 33 fps
27.5 fps (48%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.6 GB/s (47%)
1.6 GB/s (47%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.5 GB/s (43%)
2.7 GB/s (47%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15.6 GB/s (41%)
10.7 GB/s (28%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 132     avg: 145.5     median: 145.5 (2%)     max: 159 Seconds
200 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 90     avg: 96     median: 96 (1%)     max: 102 Seconds
126 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4027     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4127 sec
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16509 Points (35%)
15679 Points (33%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.2 s (2%)
9.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
23.9 s (1%)
18.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
423.7 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
89313 Points (69%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 21268     avg: 23295     median: 23295 (57%)     max: 25322 Points
21922 Points (54%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
90977 Points (74%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77244 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
79672 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 20971     avg: 21827     median: 21826.5 (55%)     max: 22682 Points
23624 Points (60%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 29555     avg: 31057     median: 31057 (55%)     max: 32559 Points
35332 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9596     avg: 9831     median: 9831 (41%)     max: 10066 Points
9687 Points (41%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2162 Points (54%)
min: 2756     avg: 2824     median: 2823.5 (71%)     max: 2891 Points
min: 2774     avg: 2793     median: 2792.5 (70%)     max: 2811 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
10309 Points (40%)
min: 16503     avg: 16679     median: 16679 (65%)     max: 16855 Points
min: 15649     avg: 16066     median: 16065.5 (62%)     max: 16482 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2071     avg: 2141     median: 2141 (84%)     max: 2211 Points
2017 Points (79%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16565     avg: 17408     median: 17408 (31%)     max: 18251 Points
16182 Points (29%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2072 Points (9%)
1939 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
16377 Points (52%)
17039 Points (54%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8865 Points (89%)
6709 Points (67%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
65863 Points (66%)
66727 Points (67%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 428     avg: 430.5     median: 430.5 (1%)     max: 433 ms
436 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 225     avg: 250     median: 250 (69%)     max: 275 Points
294 Points (81%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 275     avg: 304.5     median: 304.5 (55%)     max: 334 Points
260 Points (47%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1892     avg: 1909     median: 1909 (71%)     max: 1926 Points
1756 Points (66%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 116.5     avg: 151.8     median: 151.8 (26%)     max: 187.1 Watt
110.3 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 115.3     avg: 170.7     median: 170.7 (31%)     max: 226 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.45     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (6%)     max: 9.5 Watt
13.9 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
7.2 Watt (8%)
6.2 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
25.3 Points per Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 → 146% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 → 143% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 23. 23:28:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18906 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18881 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18888 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:18:47 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18906 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 18906 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18881 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#11 got single benchmarks 18881 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18888 +0.003s ... 0.021s

#13 got single benchmarks 18888 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.059s ... 0.085s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.085s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)