Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is a relatively powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in October 2024. The hybrid architecture APU has 8 CPU cores onboard (a mix of three Zen 5 and five Zen 5c cores) running at 2.0 to 5.0 GHz, along with the 12 CU RDNA 3.5 Radeon 880M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. The AMD Secure Processor (which in a nutshell is an on-package ARM co-processor) is onboard as well as are a few other higher-end features such as AMD-Vi. Other key features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and up to LPDDR5x-8000 RAM support, including ECC RAM.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores found in two separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with.

Either way, mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) closer to desktop Zen 4 than to desktop Zen 5 due to differing cache sizes, vast differences in AVX-512 throughput and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput respectively. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is a lot more complex than first-gen XDNA was, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As is usual for laptop CPUs, the Ryzen 7 AI PRO chip is not user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good.

Performance

We fully expect this PRO series processor to be 15% to 25% slower than the 10-core Ryzen AI 9 365 chip for Core Ultra 7 155U-like multi-thread benchmark scores. Of course, a lot depends on how high the power targets are which can differ vastly between designs.

Graphics

The Radeon 880M is the direct successor to the 780M. It packs several differences under the hood, such as faster caches; its 12 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs/WGPs (768 unified shaders) run at up to 2,900 MHz. With well over 30 fps in both Once Human and The First Descendant (1080p - Low), this AMD iGPU is certainly fast enough for a fair bit of casual as well as competitive gaming.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs such as AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The 360 is supposed to have a low-term TDP power target of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The 4 nm TSMC process that these CPUs are built with makes for above average, as of late 2024, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme

The Ryzen Z2 Extreme is a relatively powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in early 2025. The hybrid architecture APU has 8 CPU cores onboard (a mix of three Zen 5 and five Zen 5c cores) running at 2.0 to 5.0 GHz, along with the 16 CU RDNA 3.5 Radeon 880M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Compared to the similar Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, the Z2 Extreme does not offer the Ryzen AI NPU.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores found in two separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with.

Either way, mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) closer to desktop Zen 4 than to desktop Zen 5 due to differing cache sizes, vast differences in AVX-512 throughput and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput respectively. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is a lot more complex than first-gen XDNA was, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As is usual for mobile CPUs, the Ryzen 7 AI PRO chip is not user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good.

Performance

The performance should be similar to the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 due to the similar specs, but limited due to TDP and heat restrictions in handhelds.

Graphics

The Radeon 880M is the direct successor to the 780M. It packs several differences under the hood, such as faster caches; its 16 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs/WGPs (768 unified shaders) run at a currently undisclosed clock speed. With well over 30 fps in both Once Human and The First Descendant (1080p - Low), this AMD iGPU is usually certainly fast enough for a fair bit of casual as well as competitive gaming.

Power consumption

The Z2 Extreme is supposed to have a low-term TDP power target of 28 W, with handheld makers free to set between 15 and 35 W. 

The 4 nm TSMC process that these CPUs are built with makes for above average, as of late 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme
CodenameStrix Point (Zen 5)Strix Point (Zen 5)
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)AMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Point (Zen 5)
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 compare2 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 « 2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 compare2 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 3602 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme « 2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Clock2000 - 5000 MHz2000 - 5000 MHz
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
3 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
5 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
8 / 16
3 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
5 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
TDP28 Watt15 Watt
TDP Turbo PL254 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
SocketFP8FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 880M ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon 890M
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
38.8 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
108.5 Points (61%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
708 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
13794 Points (13%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1958 Points (82%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
766 Points (83%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5398 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2023 Points (13%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
271 Points (75%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
25.5 Points (33%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.5 Points (83%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8410 Points (51%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
44438 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
76704 Points (49%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15443 Points (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
287.9 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4389 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
52491 MIPS (30%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5417 MIPS (64%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
123.3 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
296.9 fps (8%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
17.2 fps (30%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.9 GB/s (33%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.7 GB/s (28%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
388 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
243 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (10%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.4 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
424.1 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15769 Points (39%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
21341 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
8042 Points (34%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2699 Points (67%)
2769 Points (69%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
12344 Points (48%)
12072 Points (47%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1995 Points (78%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
10661 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1914 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
10575 Points (33%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8042 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
40993 Points (41%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
454 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
254 Points (70%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
300 Points (54%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1676 Points (63%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
45.2 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
5.7 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.7 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme → 100% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 10. 16:18:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18004 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18735 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:38:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18004 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 18004 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18735 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 18735 +0.004s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.041s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.042s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)