Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X vs AMD Ryzen 9 9900X vs AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is an upper mid-range desktop CPU of the Granite Ridge product family that sports 8 Zen 5 cores (16 threads) running at 3.8 GHz to 5.5 GHz, along with PCIe 5 support and a basic RDNA 2 architecture iGPU. The Ryzen was launched in June 2024, with sales slated to start some time in August.

Architecture and Features

Like Strix Point APUs, Granite Ridge processors make use of the new Zen 5 microarchitecture. However, there are no efficient cores here; all of 9700X's cores are full Zen 5 cores with a "proper" Zen 5 implementation, not the simplified mobile version that has a lower AVX-512 performance. Furthermore, Granite Ridge is a multi-die design with only the CPU cores produced using a fairly modern 4 nm TSMC process. Strix Point processors are a single-die design, from what we know.

According to AMD, desktop Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC uplift over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the 9700X has 32 MB of L3 cache and 24 direct PCIe 5 lanes (3.93 GB/s throughput per lane) with up to 12 additional PCIe 4 lanes available depending on the motherboard. It supports DDR5 RAM as fast as 5,600 MT/s (up to 8,000 MT/s if overclocked).

The 9700X is unlocked for overclocking. Naturally, the AM5 socket CPU fully supports Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 as well as many Linux distros.

Performance

In our review, the Ryzen 7 delivered multi-thread benchmark scores very close to those of the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and 375, as well as the Core i7-12700 and i7-12700K.

Graphics

The Radeon 610M comes equipped with just 128 unified shaders running at up to 2,200 MHz. While this certainly isn't a gaming GPU, it's fast enough to run some competitive titles such as Counter-Strike 2 (~50 fps at 1080p / Low) as well as older (pre-2019) titles.

It can HW-decode many popular video codecs including first and foremost AVC, HEVC, VP9, AV1.

Power consumption

The CPU cores are built with TSMC's N4P process for a good, as of mid 2024, power efficiency. (Apple is the leader in this regard with the second-generation 3 nm process.)

The Ryzen 7's long-term TDP is either 65 W or 105 W, with each user free to make their own choice. If overclocked, its power consumption figures will increase significantly.

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

The Ryzen 9 9900X is fast desktop processor of the Granite Ridge product family that sports 12 Zen 5 cores (24 threads) running at 4.4 GHz to 5.6 GHz, PCIe 5 support and a basic RDNA 2 architecture iGPU. The Ryzen was launched in June 2024, with sales slated to start some time in August.

Architecture and Features

Like Strix Point APUs, Granite Ridge processors make use of the new Zen 5 microarchitecture. However, there are no efficient cores here; all of 9900X's cores are full Zen 5 cores. Furthermore, Granite Ridge is a multi-die design with only the CPU cores produced using a fairly modern 4 nm TSMC process. Strix Point processors are a single-die design, from what we know.

According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the 9900X has 64 MB of L3 cache and 24 direct PCIe 5 lanes (3.93 GB/s throughput per lane) with up to 12 additional PCIe 4 lanes available depending on the motherboard. It supports DDR5 RAM as fast as fast as 5,600 MT/s (up to 8,000 MT/s if overclocked).

The 9900X is unlocked for overclocking. Naturally, the AM5 socket CPU fully supports Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 as well as many Linux distros.

Performance

If early July leaks are any indication, the CPU delivers multi-thread performance on par with the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and the Intel Core i7-14700K. We'll update this section once we get our hands on a system powered by the 9900X.

Graphics

The Radeon 610M comes equipped with just 128 unified shaders running at up to 2,200 MHz. Its gaming performance is slated to be extremely low and only just sufficient for pre-2020 games in resolutions such as 1024x768.

Power consumption

The CPU cores are built with TSMC's N4P process for good, as of mid 2024, power efficiency. (Apple is the leader in this regard with the second-generation 3 nm process.)

The Ryzen 7's long-term TDP is 120 W. It'll probably consume at least 170 W when under heavy short-term loads. If overclocked, the power consumption figures will increase significantly.

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 9800X3D

Der AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D ist ein High-End-Prozessor, der speziell für Gamer und anspruchsvolle Anwender entwickelt wurde. Er basiert auf der neuesten Zen-5-Architektur von AMD und wird im fortschrittlichen 4-nm-Verfahren gefertigt, was nicht nur höhere Effizienz, sondern auch eine bessere Leistung ermöglicht. Mit seinen 8 Kernen und 16 Threads bietet der 9800X3D eine solide Basis für rechenintensive Anwendungen.

Der größte Vorteil des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D ist die 3D V-Cache-Technologie, die komplett überarbeitet wurde und sich signifikant von den Modellen der 7000er-Serie unterscheidet. Die Änderungen resultieren in einer deutlich gesteigerten Taktfrequenz und einer besseren Wärmeverteilung. Der interne Aufbau besteht weiterhin aus einem I/O-Die sowie einem CCD. Letzterer beinhaltet die 8 Kerne sowie den 3D V-Cache und wird im 4nm-Prozess hergestellt. Beim I/O-Die hält AMD weiterhin am 6nm-Herstellungsprozess fest. Die Taktraten steigen im Vergleich zum Vorgängermodell spürbar. So beträgt der Basistakt 4,7 GH/z, wenngleich im Turbo bis zu 5,2 GH/s möglich sind.

Neben der überragenden Gaming-Performance überzeugt der AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D auch in produktiven Anwendungen. Während er speziell auf Spieleoptimierung ausgelegt ist, schneidet er in Anwendungen wie 3D-Modellierung, Videobearbeitung und anderen kreativen Workloads spürbar besser ab als ein AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Die Leistungsaufnahme des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D beträgt 120 Watt, welche als PPT maximal 162 Watt beträgt. Damit gibt es in diesem Punkt keine Änderungen im Vergleich zum AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Aufgrund gesteigerter Leistung kann die Effizienz des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D spürbar gesteigert werden. An die Effizienz der Arrow-Lake-Prozessoren kommt AMD allerdings trotz deutlich besserer Gaming-Leistung nicht heran.

Hier geht es zu unserem Test des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 9700XAMD Ryzen 9 9900XAMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
CodenameGranite RidgeGranite RidgeGranite Ridge
SeriesAMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)AMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)AMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)
Series: Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5) Granite Ridge
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X « 3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X « 4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D « 4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5500 MHz4400 - 5600 MHz4700 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB768 KB640 KB
L2 Cache8 MB12 MB8 MB
L3 Cache32 MB64 MB96 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.5 GHz AMD Zen 5
12 / 24
12 x 5.6 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP65 Watt120 Watt120 Watt
Technology4 nm & 6 nm4 nm & 6 nm4 nm
max. Temp.95 °C95 °C95 °C
SocketAM5AM5AM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesDDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR5-5600 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, EVP, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, SHA, XFR2
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
TDP Turbo PL2162 Watt
Transistors9970 Million
Voltage1.28 - 1.31 (nominal), 1.4 (max) V
Die Size192.6 mm2
$479 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen 7 9700X
47.3 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen 9 9900X
50.4 pt (84%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 9800X3D
47.5 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
136 Points (76%)
138 Points (78%)
132 Points (74%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1203 Points (22%)
1818 Points (34%)
1358 Points (25%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
20485 Points (19%)
32172 Points (30%)
23230 Points (22%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2211 Points (94%)
2253 Points (96%)
2080 Points (88%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
870 Points (96%)
885 Points (98%)
818 Points (91%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
7956 Points (19%)
12551 Points (31%)
9057 Points (22%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3178 Points (20%)
5008 Points (32%)
3647 Points (23%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
346 Points (97%)
353 Points (99%)
328 Points (92%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
36.2 Points (47%)
41.7 Points (54%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 4.06     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (96%)     max: 4.21 Points
3.8 Points (91%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9457 Points (57%)
8933 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
57914 Points (42%)
60825 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
108170 Points (69%)
119288 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17765 Points (22%)
16618 Points (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
59.6 s (1%)
54.3 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
2.3 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
13549 Points (21%)
15574 Points (25%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
82553 MIPS (47%)
122724 MIPS (70%)
90354 MIPS (52%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
7894 MIPS (93%)
8020 MIPS (95%)
8484 MIPS (100%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
176.1 fps (59%)
203 fps (68%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
376 fps (87%)
375.5 fps (87%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
26.4 fps (46%)
38.7 fps (68%)
30.6 fps (54%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.7 GB/s (50%)
1.7 GB/s (50%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
2.9 GB/s (50%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
16.1 GB/s (42%)
17.8 GB/s (46%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
244 Seconds (3%)
151 Seconds (2%)
204 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
154 Seconds (1%)
97 Seconds (1%)
137 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.3 sec (7%)
0.3 sec (7%)
0.3 sec (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
18794 Points (40%)
min: 17855     avg: 18234     median: 18224 (39%)     max: 18723 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.1 s (1%)
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
369.7 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 106182     avg: 108509     median: 108630 (83%)     max: 109721 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
30757 Points (76%)
29231 Points (72%)
min: 34973     avg: 38176     median: 38658 (95%)     max: 40153 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 104270     avg: 105425     median: 105457 (86%)     max: 106627 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 104072     avg: 105335     median: 105271 (85%)     max: 106576 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 106846     avg: 108682     median: 108620 (90%)     max: 112948 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 28550     avg: 29171     median: 29197 (74%)     max: 29573 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
38088 Points (68%)
44322 Points (79%)
min: 38742     avg: 39130     median: 39114 (70%)     max: 39893 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
14306 Points (60%)
15940 Points (67%)
min: 14848     avg: 15705     median: 15741 (66%)     max: 16218 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
3373 Points (84%)
3429 Points (86%)
min: 3213     avg: 3278     median: 3285.5 (82%)     max: 3337 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
16817 Points (65%)
20380 Points (79%)
min: 17704     avg: 18142     median: 18155.5 (70%)     max: 18574 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2507 Points (98%)
2544 Points (99%)
min: 2382     avg: 2424     median: 2428 (95%)     max: 2450 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
14613 Points (26%)
21384 Points (38%)
min: 15973     avg: 16458     median: 16532 (30%)     max: 16698 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2402 Points (10%)
min: 2176     avg: 2274     median: 2287 (10%)     max: 2316 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14698 Points (46%)
min: 15903     avg: 16426     median: 16496 (52%)     max: 16773 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9801 Points (98%)
min: 9107     avg: 9430     median: 9433 (94%)     max: 9739 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
59594 Points (59%)
min: 64532     avg: 68455     median: 68610 (68%)     max: 70460 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
383 ms (0%)
383 ms (0%)
401 ms (0%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
346 Points (95%)
349 Points (96%)
337 Points (93%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
398 Points (71%)
398 Points (71%)
353 Points (63%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2174 Points (81%)
2289 Points (86%)
min: 2210     avg: 2279     median: 2278.5 (85%)     max: 2347 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
180.2 Watt (31%)
278 Watt (48%)
272 Watt (47%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
174.6 Watt (32%)
274 Watt (50%)
238 Watt (43%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
83 Watt (55%)
85.1 Watt (56%)
min: 87.4     avg: 106.3     median: 105.5 (70%)     max: 137.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
18.2 Points per Watt (14%)
18.3 Points per Watt (14%)
15.3 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 9700X → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 9900X → 122% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D → 106% n=25

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 17. 13:54:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17989 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17990 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18494 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 16 May 2025 05:18:06 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17989 +0.003s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 17989 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 17990 +0.003s ... 0.019s

#11 got single benchmarks 17990 +0.003s ... 0.022s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18494 +0.003s ... 0.025s

#13 got single benchmarks 18494 +0.03s ... 0.056s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.087s ... 0.143s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.143s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)