Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 vs ATI Radeon Xpress 200M

ATI Radeon Xpress 1150

► remove from comparison ATI Radeon Xpress 1150

The successor of the Xpress M200 integrated shared memory graphic card for notebooks from ATI shows a good performane for graphic cards without own memory. According ATI, integrated X300 graphics are implemented. The Xpress 1150 is the faster clocked version (Xpress 1100 is slower clocked). Furthermore it was praised as Windows Vista Premium Ready by ATI (shall support Aero Glass fully).

Supports the processors: Mobile Sempron, Mobile Athlon 64, Turion 64 (X2)


The performance is sufficient for elder games and the performance should be below a normal X300.

ATI Radeon Xpress 1250

► remove from comparison ATI Radeon Xpress 1250

The ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 is an integrated graphics card based on the dedicated X300 GPU but without dedicated graphics memory. It should be compatible with Windows Vista Aero.

ATI Radeon Xpress 200M

► remove from comparison ATI Radeon Xpress 200M

ATI Radeon Xpress 200M is the shared memory integrated graphic card from ATI. It is a derivate of the Mobility Radeon X300 graphic card, but slower because of the lack of own memory and slower clock speed. Sometimes it is called Mobility Radeon X200. It is a bit faster than the Intel GMA 950 graphic core and threrefore not really suited for actual gaming.

show full text
ATI Radeon Xpress 1150ATI Radeon Xpress 1250ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Radeon Xpress Series
Radeon Xpress 1250 4/0 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1150 2/4/2 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 200M 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1100 4/2 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1250 4/0 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1150 2/4/2 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 200M 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1100 4/2 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1250 4/0 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1150 2/4/2 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 200M 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1100 4/2 cores @ 0.3 GHz
CodenameRS482M
Pipelines2/4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 0 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed400 MHz400 MHz350 MHz
Memory Typeshared Memory
Shared Memoryyesyesno
APIDirectX 9b, Shader 2.0DirectX 9, Shader 2.0DirectX 9b, Shader 2.0
technology110 nm80 nm130 nm
Date of Announcement01.06.2006 30.08.2006 18.02.2005
Informationselben Features wie Mobility Radeon X300Same technical features as the X300 core.
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.ati.comati.amd.comwww.ati.com
Features

Avivo Display, Multimonitor Support, Windows Vista Premium Ready (Aero), MPEG-2 Hardware Decoder, optional HDMI output possible

Up to 256 MB taken from main memory.
Max. Amount of Memory0 (shared) MB

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 2189     avg: 4279     median: 4712.5 (5%)     max: 5500 Points
min: 3940     avg: 4654     median: 4576 (5%)     max: 5447 Points
min: 3200     avg: 4168     median: 4441 (5%)     max: 4863 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 592     avg: 1235     median: 1424 (1%)     max: 1500 Points
min: 1310     avg: 1976     median: 2006 (1%)     max: 2580 Points
min: 1100     avg: 1261     median: 1312 (1%)     max: 1370 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 416     avg: 633     median: 697.5 (1%)     max: 720 Points
min: 869     avg: 988     median: 928 (1%)     max: 1167 Points
min: 450     avg: 587     median: 648 (1%)     max: 663 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Radeon Xpress 1150
3DMark 06
min: 150     avg: 195.3     median: 212 (0%)     max: 224 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
min: 140     avg: 193     median: 193 (0%)     max: 246 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon Xpress 1150
3DMark 06
219 Points (0%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
445 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
202 Points (0%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
3DMark 06
min: 290     avg: 305     median: 305 (0%)     max: 320 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
3.5 Points (51%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
4.2 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
669 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
194 Points (0%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 → 144% n=4

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon Xpress 200M → 93% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
Radeon Xpress 1250:
60  fps
Radeon Xpress 200M:
48  fps
med. 800x600
Radeon Xpress 1250:
12  fps
Radeon Xpress 200M:
10  fps
high 1024x768
Radeon Xpress 1250:
1  fps
Radeon Xpress 200M:
3  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon Xpress 1150:
81 89.5 ~ 85 fps
74%
Radeon Xpress 1250:
62.7  fps
100%
Radeon Xpress 200M:
82.5 87 ~ 85 fps

Average Gaming ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 → 100%

Average Gaming ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 → 74%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 74%

Average Gaming ATI Radeon Xpress 200M → 100%

ATI Radeon Xpress 1150ATI Radeon Xpress 1250ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
F.E.A.R.6012148103
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo8562.785
ATI Radeon Xpress 1150ATI Radeon Xpress 1250ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps







1









< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1


1

1









< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1

1


1

1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 28. 21:17:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 52 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 77 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 50 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:17:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.018s ... 0.019s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 52 +0.02s ... 0.039s

#10 got single benchmarks 52 +0.007s ... 0.046s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 77 +0s ... 0.046s

#12 got single benchmarks 77 +0.005s ... 0.051s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 50 +0s ... 0.052s

#14 got single benchmarks 50 +0.012s ... 0.064s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.071s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.071s

#18 Got 11 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.073s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.073s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.073s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.074s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.074s

#23 return log +0s ... 0.074s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)