Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon 860M vs AMD Radeon 820M

AMD Radeon 860M

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon 860M

Die AMD Radeon 860M ist eine starke integrierte Grafikkarte in Strix Point / Krackan Point APUs. Sie basiert auf die aktuelle RDNA 3+ Architektur und wurde Mitte 2024 vorgestellt. Die 860M bietet 8 der 16 Compute Units (CUS, 512 Unified Shader) mit bis zu 3.000 MHz. Wie auch die 700M iGPUs, die 800M Serie unterstützt bis zu 4 Monitore mit Auflösungen bis zu SUHD 4230p60.

Die Spieleleistung sollte oberhalb der Radeon 760M liegen (ebenfalls 8 CUs) und daher auch für viele anspruchsvolle Spiele in niedriger Detailstufe reichen.

Die AMD Radeon 860M ist im SoC integriert und wird daher ebenfalls bei TSMC im modernen 4nm Prozess gefertigt.

AMD Radeon 820M

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon 820M

Die AMD Radeon 820M ist eine schwache integrierte Grafikkarte in Strix Point / Krackan Point APUs. Sie basiert auf die aktuelle RDNA 3+ Architektur und wurde Anfang 2025 vorgestellt. Die 820M bietet 2 der 16 Compute Units (CUs, 128 Unified Shader) mit bis zu 2.800 MHz. Wie auch die 700M iGPUs, die 800M Serie unterstützt bis zu 4 Monitore mit Auflösungen bis zu SUHD 4230p60.

Die Spieleleistung sollte deutlich unterhalb der Radeon 840M liegen und dadurch nur für wenige anspruchslose Spiele geeignet sein.

Die AMD Radeon 820M ist im SoC integriert und wird daher ebenfalls bei TSMC im modernen 4nm Prozess gefertigt.

show full text
AMD Radeon 860MAMD Radeon 820M
AMD Radeon 800M Serie
Radeon 890M compare 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M compare 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 860M 512 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 840M compare 256 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 820M 128 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 890M compare 1024 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 880M compare 768 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 860M 512 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 840M compare 256 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
Radeon 820M 128 @ 2.9 GHz? Bit @ 7500 MHz
CodenameKrackan PointKrackan Point
ArchitekturRDNA 3+RDNA 3+
Pipelines512 - unified128 - unified
Raytracing Cores82
Kerntakt2900 (Boost) MHz2900 (Boost) MHz
Speichertakt7500 MHz7500 MHz
Shared Memoryjaja
APIDirectX 12_2DirectX 12_2
Herstellungsprozess4 nm4 nm
PCIe44
Displays4 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.14 Displays (max.), HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort 2.1
FeaturesFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decodingFreeSync, Miracast, SUHD 4320p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/VP9/AV1 encoding and decoding
Notebookgrößemittel (15.4" z.B.)mittel (15.4" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum02.06.2024 02.06.2024
PredecessorRadeon 760MRadeon 740M
CPU in Radeon 860MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 7 3508 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz3000 MHz
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 3508 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz3000 MHz
min. - max.? MHz3000 MHz
CPU in Radeon 820MGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen AI 5 3304 x 2000 MHz, 28 W? MHz2800 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Radeon 860M
2.7 pt (8%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.05426 -98%
...
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.37 -11%
AMD Radeon 760M
2.38 -11%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2.45 -8%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
2.47 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2.52 -6%
AMD Radeon R9 M395
2.55 -4%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
2.56 -4%
AMD Radeon 680M
2.57 -4%
AMD FirePro W7170M
2.6 -3%
AMD Radeon 860M
2.67
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
2.74 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
2.74 3%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
2.74 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
2.79 4%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
2.84 6%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
2.89 8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2.9 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
2.91 9%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
2.96 11%
...
Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop
19 612%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
33.3 1147%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1883     avg: 2892     median: 3057 (8%)     max: 3347 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1656     avg: 2585     median: 2753 (6%)     max: 2987 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 22791     avg: 26220     median: 26220 (25%)     max: 29649 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 24614     avg: 31758     median: 31757.5 (8%)     max: 38901 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3999     avg: 6163     median: 6549.5 (10%)     max: 7241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 4449     avg: 6804     median: 7121.5 (7%)     max: 7935 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
210628 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 5570     avg: 5872     median: 6020 (7%)     max: 6025 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6804     avg: 10770     median: 11549 (14%)     max: 12267 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6901     avg: 10722     median: 11499.5 (9%)     max: 12149 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + AMD Radeon 860M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
24821 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + AMD Radeon 860M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
20346 Points (11%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + AMD Radeon 860M
3DMark 06
15774 Points (21%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x720 + AMD Radeon 860M
3DMark 06
14855 Points (19%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 + AMD Radeon 860M
3DMark 06
14920 Points (19%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + AMD Radeon 860M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
4517 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon 860M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 145.7     avg: 208.4     median: 227.5 (13%)     max: 253 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + AMD Radeon 860M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
97.9 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 16.89     avg: 24.2     median: 24.1 (9%)     max: 31.4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 35.2     avg: 51.3     median: 51.3 (9%)     max: 67.4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 81.5     avg: 119.1     median: 119.1 (9%)     max: 156.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 97.2     avg: 135.5     median: 135.5 (13%)     max: 173.7 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
229.4 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
289.7 fps (12%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + AMD Radeon 860M
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
494.5 fps (4%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 104.6     avg: 209.8     median: 209.8 (5%)     max: 315 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 22403     avg: 24406     median: 24342 (6%)     max: 27133 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 26038     avg: 34633     median: 36404 (9%)     max: 38899 Points
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
536 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
974 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
6397 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.5     avg: 56.1     median: 60.3 (8%)     max: 65.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 36.2     avg: 65.2     median: 65.2 (19%)     max: 85.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 32.8     avg: 64.8     median: 64.9 (8%)     max: 84.7 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
min: 0.181     avg: 0.2     median: 0.3 (1%)     max: 0.2984 fps per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon 860M → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
61.3 72.9 77.2 ~ 70 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
54.1 65.2 69.6 ~ 63 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
48.7 51.8 ~ 50 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
10.4 10.6 ~ 11 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
24.3 30.4 37.1 40.4 40.4 42.8 ~ 36 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
18.9 21.9 28.3 29.9 31 32.8 ~ 27 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
12.3 17.1 22.4 23.6 24.3 25.5 ~ 21 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
11 11.1 17.9 19.1 19.9 20.9 ~ 17 fps
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
23.6 28.4 34 36 36.9 37 ~ 33 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
17.9 23.6 26.2 29 29.9 30.1 ~ 26 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
14.6 19.2 20.4 23 23.5 23.6 ~ 21 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
14.3 18.9 20 22.5 22.9 23.1 ~ 20 fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 860M:
88.5 141.5 165.4 171.3 177.3 ~ 149 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
34.7 54.6 65 68.2 70.8 ~ 59 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
29.3 44.4 53.9 55.7 58.7 ~ 48 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
25.2 37.3 45.5 45.7 48.5 ~ 40 fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 860M:
97 104 ~ 101 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
47 52 ~ 50 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
43 47 ~ 45 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
40 44 ~ 42 fps
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 860M:
52.9 57.6 66.3 73.6 77.2 77.6 ~ 68 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
41.6 44.7 52.3 58.4 59 59.7 ~ 53 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
34.9 38.7 43.4 47.7 47.8 48.6 ~ 44 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 860M:
40.6 65 66.7 78.7 83.9 85.6 ~ 70 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
21.6 32.3 35.5 37.9 39.2 41.5 ~ 35 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
15.5 22.4 23.7 27.1 27.4 28.6 ~ 24 fps
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon 860M:
78.2 131.7 164.8 165.9 166.4 167.5 ~ 146 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 860M:
50.9 119.1 122.6 134.9 137.9 139.5 ~ 117 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
50.7 74.1 80.4 82.1 83.4 84.8 ~ 76 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
39.8 66.6 74.2 77 78.1 78.7 ~ 69 fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Radeon 860M:
125.1 163.1 169.9 172.5 173.2 173.8 ~ 163 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon 860M:
113.6 153.3 157.2 157.4 160.5 ~ 148 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
33.6 52.1 57.4 70 74.7 76 ~ 61 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon 860M:
13.5 20.6 22.2 27.8 28 30.7 ~ 24 fps

Average Gaming AMD Radeon 860M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

AMD Radeon 860MAMD Radeon 820M
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2470635011
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty36272117
Baldur's Gate 333262120
Strange Brigade149594840
Far Cry 5101504542
X-Plane 11.11685344
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark703524
Dota 2 Reborn1461177669
GTA V1631486124
AMD Radeon 860MAMD Radeon 820M
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
4
3		2
4
2
1		3
4
2
4
2
1






< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

















Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 23. 23:22:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12988 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13109 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:19:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.018s ... 0.018s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.018s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12988 +0.017s ... 0.034s

#9 got single benchmarks 12988 +0.01s ... 0.044s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13109 +0s ... 0.045s

#11 got single benchmarks 13109 +0s ... 0.045s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.045s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.059s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.059s

#15 Got 169 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.07s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.07s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.07s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.074s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.074s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.075s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)