Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D vs AMD Ryzen 7 9700X vs AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D

► remove from comparison

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

The Ryzen 7 9700X is an upper mid-range desktop CPU of the Granite Ridge product family that features 8 Zen 5 cores (16 threads) running at 3.8 GHz to 5.5 GHz, PCIe 5 support and a basic iGPU. The Ryzen was launched in June 2024, with sales slated to start some time in July.

Architecture and Features

Just like Strix Point APUs, Granite Ridge processors make use of the new Zen 5 microarchitecture. However, there are no efficient cores here; all of 9700X's cores are full Zen 5 cores. Furthermore, Granite Ridge is a multi-die design with only the CPU cores produced using a fairly modern 4 nm TSMC process. Strix Point processors are a single-die design, from what we know.

According to AMD, Zen 5 delivers a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4 thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the 9700X has 32 MB of L3 cache and 24 direct PCIe 5 lanes (3.93 GB/s throughput per lane) with up to 12 additional PCIe 4 lanes available depending on the motherboard. It supports DDR5 RAM as fast as 5600 MT/s, ECC memory included - this too depends on the motherboard.

The 9700X is unlocked for overclocking. Naturally, the AM5 socket CPU fully supports Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 as well as many Linux distros.

Performance

If early July leaks are any indication, the 9700X is set to have multi-thread performance matching the fastest laptop chips such as the 24-core Core i9-13950HX. We'll update this section once we get our hands on a system powered by the 9700X.

Graphics

The Radeon 610M comes equipped with just 128 unified shaders running at up to 2,200 MHz. Its gaming performance is slated to be extremely low and only just sufficient for pre-2020 games in resolutions such as 1024x768.

Power consumption

The CPU cores are built with a 4 nm TSMC process for good, as of mid 2024, power efficiency. (Apple is the leader in this regard with the second-generation 3 nm process.)

The Ryzen 7's long-term TDP is 65 W. It'll probably consume at least 100 W when under heavy short-term loads. If overclocked, the power consumption figures will increase significantly.

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

► remove from comparison AMD R7 9800X3D

Der AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D ist ein High-End-Prozessor, der speziell für Gamer und anspruchsvolle Anwender entwickelt wurde. Er basiert auf der neuesten Zen-5-Architektur von AMD und wird im fortschrittlichen 4-nm-Verfahren gefertigt, was nicht nur höhere Effizienz, sondern auch eine bessere Leistung ermöglicht. Mit seinen 8 Kernen und 16 Threads bietet der 9800X3D eine solide Basis für rechenintensive Anwendungen.

Der größte Vorteil des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D ist die 3D V-Cache-Technologie, die komplett überarbeitet wurde und sich signifikant von den Modellen der 7000er-Serie unterscheidet. Die Änderungen resultieren in einer deutlich gesteigerten Taktfrequenz und einer besseren Wärmeverteilung. Der interne Aufbau besteht weiterhin aus einem I/O-Die sowie einem CCD. Letzterer beinhaltet die 8 Kerne sowie den 3D V-Cache und wird im 4nm-Prozess hergestellt. Beim I/O-Die hält AMD weiterhin am 6nm-Herstellungsprozess fest. Die Taktraten steigen im Vergleich zum Vorgängermodell spürbar. So beträgt der Basistakt 4,7 GH/z, wenngleich im Turbo bis zu 5,2 GH/s möglich sind.

Neben der überragenden Gaming-Performance überzeugt der AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D auch in produktiven Anwendungen. Während er speziell auf Spieleoptimierung ausgelegt ist, schneidet er in Anwendungen wie 3D-Modellierung, Videobearbeitung und anderen kreativen Workloads spürbar besser ab als ein AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Die Leistungsaufnahme des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D beträgt 120 Watt, welche als PPT maximal 162 Watt beträgt. Damit gibt es in diesem Punkt keine Änderungen im Vergleich zum AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Aufgrund gesteigerter Leistung kann die Effizienz des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D spürbar gesteigert werden. An die Effizienz der Arrow-Lake-Prozessoren kommt AMD allerdings trotz deutlich besserer Gaming-Leistung nicht heran.

Hier geht es zu unserem Test des AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 9950X3DAMD Ryzen 7 9700XAMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
CodenameGranite RidgeGranite RidgeGranite Ridge
SeriesAMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)AMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)AMD Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5)
Serie: Granite Ridge (Zen 5, AM5) Granite Ridge
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D « 4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X « 3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X4.3 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 9900X4.4 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X3.8 - 5.5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D « 4.7 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X3.9 - 5.4 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock4300 - 5700 MHz3800 - 5500 MHz4700 - 5200 MHz
L2 Cache16 MB8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache128 MB32 MB96 MB
Cores / Threads16 / 32
16 x 5.7 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 / 16
8 x 5.5 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 5
TDP170 Watt65 Watt120 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm & 6 nm4 nm
SocketAM5AM5AM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesDDR5-5600 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, HCPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ADDR5-5600 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 5, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, EVP, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, SHA, XFR2
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache512 KB640 KB
max. Temp.95 °C95 °C
TDP Turbo PL2162 Watt
Transistors9970 Million
Voltage1.28 - 1.31 (nominal), 1.4 (max) V
Die Size192.6 mm2
$479 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 9950X3D
52.2 pt (87%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen 7 9700X
47.3 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 9800X3D
47.4 pt (79%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
138.4 Points (78%)
136 Points (76%)
132 Points (74%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
2365 Points (44%)
1203 Points (22%)
1358 Points (25%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
42018 Points (39%)
20485 Points (19%)
23230 Points (22%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2259 Points (95%)
2211 Points (93%)
2080 Points (88%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
886 Points (97%)
870 Points (95%)
818 Points (89%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
16347 Points (40%)
7956 Points (19%)
9057 Points (22%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
6536 Points (41%)
3178 Points (20%)
3647 Points (23%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
350 Points (97%)
346 Points (96%)
328 Points (91%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
36.2 Points (47%)
41.7 Points (54%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 4.06     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (96%)     max: 4.21 Points
3.8 Points (91%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9457 Points (57%)
8933 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
57914 Points (42%)
60825 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
108170 Points (69%)
119288 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
17765 Points (22%)
16618 Points (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
59.6 s (1%)
54.3 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.4 s (0%)
2.3 s (0%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
13549 Points (21%)
15574 Points (25%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
163125 MIPS (94%)
82553 MIPS (47%)
min: 90226     avg: 90604     median: 90354 (52%)     max: 91233 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
7783 MIPS (92%)
7894 MIPS (93%)
min: 8346     avg: 8407     median: 8392 (99%)     max: 8484 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
176.1 fps (59%)
203 fps (68%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
376 fps (87%)
375.5 fps (87%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
48.5 fps (85%)
26.4 fps (46%)
30.6 fps (54%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.7 GB/s (50%)
1.7 GB/s (50%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.8 GB/s (48%)
2.9 GB/s (50%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
16.1 GB/s (42%)
17.8 GB/s (46%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
113 Seconds (1%)
244 Seconds (3%)
204 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
75 Seconds (1%)
154 Seconds (1%)
137 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.3 sec (7%)
0.3 sec (7%)
0.3 sec (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
18794 Points (40%)
min: 17855     avg: 18291     median: 18310 (39%)     max: 18804 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.5 s (2%)
8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16.1 s (1%)
17.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
369.7 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 106182     avg: 108569     median: 108660 (83%)     max: 109721 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
40609 Points (100%)
30757 Points (76%)
min: 34973     avg: 38259     median: 38748 (95%)     max: 40357 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 104270     avg: 105535     median: 105548 (86%)     max: 107334 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 104072     avg: 105460     median: 105670 (86%)     max: 107497 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 106846     avg: 108843     median: 108620 (90%)     max: 112948 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 28550     avg: 29228     median: 29237.5 (74%)     max: 29952 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
49235 Points (88%)
38088 Points (68%)
min: 38742     avg: 39168     median: 39175 (70%)     max: 39893 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
16950 Points (71%)
14306 Points (60%)
min: 14848     avg: 15735     median: 15796 (67%)     max: 16218 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
3434 Points (86%)
3373 Points (84%)
min: 3213     avg: 3278     median: 3285 (82%)     max: 3337 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
22405 Points (87%)
16817 Points (65%)
min: 17704     avg: 18158     median: 18202 (71%)     max: 18579 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2548 Points (100%)
2507 Points (98%)
min: 2382     avg: 2425     median: 2428.5 (95%)     max: 2450 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
25682 Points (46%)
14613 Points (26%)
min: 15973     avg: 16461     median: 16531 (30%)     max: 16726 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2402 Points (10%)
min: 2176     avg: 2274     median: 2282 (10%)     max: 2316 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
14698 Points (46%)
min: 15903     avg: 16432     median: 16501.5 (52%)     max: 16773 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9801 Points (98%)
min: 9107     avg: 9436     median: 9444 (94%)     max: 9739 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
59594 Points (59%)
min: 64532     avg: 68457     median: 68503 (68%)     max: 70460 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
382 ms (0%)
383 ms (0%)
401 ms (0%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
342 Points (94%)
346 Points (95%)
337 Points (93%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
387 Points (69%)
398 Points (71%)
353 Points (63%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2380 Points (89%)
2174 Points (81%)
min: 2210     avg: 2279     median: 2278.5 (85%)     max: 2347 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
320 Watt (55%)
180.2 Watt (31%)
272 Watt (47%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
309 Watt (56%)
174.6 Watt (32%)
238 Watt (43%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
95.4 Watt (63%)
83 Watt (55%)
min: 87.4     avg: 106.4     median: 105.5 (70%)     max: 137.9 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
21.2 Points per Watt (16%)
18.2 Points per Watt (14%)
15.3 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D → 100% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 9700X → 78% n=25

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D → 81% n=25

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 16. 12:51:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18719 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17989 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18494 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 16 Jun 2025 05:19:28 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 18719 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 18719 +0.004s ... 0.014s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 17989 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#11 got single benchmarks 17989 +0.005s ... 0.022s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18494 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#13 got single benchmarks 18494 +0.039s ... 0.066s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.066s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.083s ... 0.149s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.149s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)