Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 8945HS

The Ryzen 9 8945HS is a rebadged Ryzen 9 7940HS with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. To be more specific, this is a powerful Hawk Point family laptop chip that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. This APU was brought to life in H2 2023 and all of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8945HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600; no ECC support). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane. 20 lanes are available.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The 8945HS is an R9 7940HS in disguise, so it's realistic to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-12900HK and also the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1. More importantly, it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 8945HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is a powerful Hawk Point family chip that we believe to be a Ryzen 7 7840HS in disguise but with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The R7 8845HS was brought to life in H2 2023; it features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say that there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD uncorks its 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology meaning the new processors are expected to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs. Dozens of popular apps such as DaVinci Resolve support this technology, as of late 2023.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8845HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8845HS is a 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The R7 8845HS is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 8945HSAMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP45 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 8945HS
40.7 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8845HS
39.9 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 103     avg: 106.7     median: 107 (60%)     max: 109.2 Points
min: 102     avg: 104.4     median: 103.8 (58%)     max: 107.8 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 852     avg: 945     median: 959.5 (18%)     max: 988 Points
min: 567     avg: 869     median: 902 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15516     avg: 16743     median: 16937 (16%)     max: 17376 Points
min: 14895     avg: 16165     median: 16192 (15%)     max: 18037 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1719     avg: 1800     median: 1806.5 (77%)     max: 1825 Points
min: 1623     avg: 1751     median: 1769 (75%)     max: 1783 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 676     avg: 700     median: 700.5 (78%)     max: 711 Points
min: 673     avg: 686     median: 685 (76%)     max: 698 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6153     avg: 6559     median: 6621.5 (16%)     max: 6785 Points
min: 5808     avg: 6317     median: 6346 (15%)     max: 7026 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2521     avg: 2654     median: 2649.5 (17%)     max: 2775 Points
min: 2342     avg: 2563     median: 2575 (16%)     max: 2908 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 265     avg: 281.4     median: 282.5 (79%)     max: 288 Points
min: 269     avg: 276     median: 276 (78%)     max: 283 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.14     avg: 30.8     median: 31.1 (40%)     max: 31.77 Points
min: 29.28     avg: 29.8     median: 29.8 (39%)     max: 30.3 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.28     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (81%)     max: 3.45 Points
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (79%)     max: 3.34 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7594     avg: 7767     median: 7785.5 (47%)     max: 7901 Points
min: 7426     avg: 7545     median: 7523 (45%)     max: 7685 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 46572     avg: 48831     median: 49299 (36%)     max: 50153 Points
min: 47332     avg: 47532     median: 47500 (34%)     max: 47764 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 84253     avg: 87958     median: 89478 (57%)     max: 90144 Points
min: 85872     avg: 86827     median: 86827 (55%)     max: 87782 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14451     avg: 14535     median: 14561 (18%)     max: 14593 Points
min: 14163     avg: 14360     median: 14360 (17%)     max: 14557 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 67.933     avg: 108.7     median: 85.2 (1%)     max: 196.4 s
min: 70.718     avg: 113.2     median: 98.9 (1%)     max: 170 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.563     avg: 3.5     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 6.2 s
min: 2.703     avg: 3.6     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 5.3 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7332     avg: 10823     median: 7793.5 (12%)     max: 20374 Points
min: 7275     avg: 11203     median: 7327 (12%)     max: 19008 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66557     avg: 71014     median: 71534 (41%)     max: 73742 MIPS
min: 62669     avg: 68390     median: 68354 (39%)     max: 74664 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5994     avg: 6460     median: 6576.5 (78%)     max: 6691 MIPS
min: 5197     avg: 6319     median: 6393 (75%)     max: 6714 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 141.2     avg: 149     median: 150.7 (50%)     max: 155 fps
min: 143.7     avg: 146.8     median: 146.8 (49%)     max: 149.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 297     avg: 298.3     median: 298 (69%)     max: 300 fps
min: 286.5     avg: 287.8     median: 287.8 (66%)     max: 289 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 19.8     avg: 21.1     median: 21.1 (37%)     max: 22.2 fps
min: 18.6     avg: 20.1     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.3     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (38%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (35%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
min: 2     avg: 2     median: 2 (34%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14.5     avg: 15     median: 15 (39%)     max: 15.4 GB/s
min: 14     avg: 14.4     median: 14.4 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 293     avg: 310.8     median: 312 (4%)     max: 326 Seconds
min: 288     avg: 326.8     median: 318 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 186     avg: 194     median: 192.5 (1%)     max: 206 Seconds
min: 179     avg: 200.9     median: 198 (1%)     max: 216 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4294     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4576 sec
min: 0.4304     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4935 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15007     avg: 15716     median: 15691 (33%)     max: 16449 Points
min: 15091     avg: 15422     median: 15313 (33%)     max: 15969 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.962     avg: 7.1     median: 7 (2%)     max: 7.2 s
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.331 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.31     avg: 17.5     median: 17.5 (1%)     max: 17.8 s
min: 17.6     avg: 17.8     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 18.138 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 576.7     avg: 615     median: 624.7 (3%)     max: 644.49 s
min: 659.5     avg: 662     median: 662.4 (3%)     max: 665.289 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 69373     avg: 82115     median: 84110 (65%)     max: 88101 Points
min: 82048     avg: 82541     median: 82586.5 (63%)     max: 82943 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17239     avg: 21793     median: 22257.5 (55%)     max: 25276 Points
min: 19492     avg: 22379     median: 22207 (55%)     max: 26212 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 82144     avg: 86374     median: 84952.5 (69%)     max: 92815 Points
min: 81620     avg: 84501     median: 84429 (69%)     max: 88462 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 83482     avg: 86934     median: 85496 (69%)     max: 93057 Points
min: 81607     avg: 85179     median: 85402 (69%)     max: 88305 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 86257     avg: 88776     median: 87230 (72%)     max: 94974 Points
min: 83958     avg: 87188     median: 85870 (71%)     max: 93052 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13624     avg: 19839     median: 20539 (52%)     max: 21573 Points
min: 18507     avg: 20158     median: 20268.5 (51%)     max: 22215 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23442     avg: 27506     median: 27488.5 (49%)     max: 30090 Points
min: 25099     avg: 27322     median: 27428 (49%)     max: 30715 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8883     avg: 10993     median: 11086 (47%)     max: 11856 Points
min: 8550     avg: 11247     median: 10853 (46%)     max: 19164 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2399     avg: 2649     median: 2667.5 (67%)     max: 2745 Points
min: 2510     avg: 2624     median: 2630 (66%)     max: 2698 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12015     avg: 13232     median: 13255.5 (51%)     max: 13715 Points
min: 11073     avg: 12854     median: 12998 (50%)     max: 14014 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2575     avg: 2900     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
min: 2577     avg: 2844     median: 2846 (90%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12920     avg: 17803     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
min: 12719     avg: 16862     median: 16862.5 (69%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1835     avg: 1950     median: 1979.5 (77%)     max: 2039 Points
min: 1765     avg: 1931     median: 1949 (76%)     max: 2004 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10985     avg: 11970     median: 12008.5 (22%)     max: 12520 Points
min: 11256     avg: 11906     median: 11864 (21%)     max: 12726 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1841     avg: 1903     median: 1907 (8%)     max: 1930 Points
min: 1869     avg: 1895     median: 1898 (8%)     max: 1914 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11804     avg: 12252     median: 12315 (39%)     max: 12573 Points
min: 11742     avg: 12016     median: 12086 (38%)     max: 12109 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7933     avg: 8130     median: 8140 (81%)     max: 8278 Points
min: 8034     avg: 8109     median: 8077.5 (81%)     max: 8245 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 46366     avg: 48538     median: 49269 (49%)     max: 49654 Points
min: 47602     avg: 48576     median: 48614.5 (48%)     max: 49473 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 488     avg: 524     median: 507.5 (1%)     max: 586 ms
min: 496     avg: 534     median: 527 (1%)     max: 664 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94227 Points (72%)
min: 85632     avg: 90739     median: 90496 (70%)     max: 96330 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 226     avg: 259.7     median: 267 (73%)     max: 275 Points
min: 176.4     avg: 255.2     median: 256.5 (70%)     max: 314 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 268     avg: 313.3     median: 316 (57%)     max: 344 Points
min: 275     avg: 304.2     median: 305 (55%)     max: 334 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1767     avg: 1825     median: 1839.5 (69%)     max: 1866 Points
min: 1531     avg: 1772     median: 1795.5 (67%)     max: 1939 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 72.5     avg: 89.6     median: 86.8 (15%)     max: 126.4 Watt
min: 42.5     avg: 82.2     median: 81.1 (14%)     max: 147.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 70.3     avg: 89.4     median: 84.1 (15%)     max: 130.5 Watt
min: 39     avg: 79.3     median: 78.1 (14%)     max: 145.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.93     avg: 12.3     median: 10.6 (7%)     max: 21.6 Watt
min: 3.78     avg: 9     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 16.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 8.62     avg: 16.2     median: 17.6 (19%)     max: 22.5 Watt
min: 5.42     avg: 8.9     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 16.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 28.4     avg: 32.8     median: 33.4 (25%)     max: 35.9 Points per Watt
min: 20     avg: 35.5     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 66.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS → 100% n=55

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS → 97% n=55

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 12:35:11

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16397 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16399 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:16:39 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16397 +0.004s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 16397 +0.014s ... 0.023s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 16399 +0.004s ... 0.027s

#10 got single benchmarks 16399 +0.019s ... 0.046s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.067s ... 0.114s

#13 return log +0.005s ... 0.119s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)