Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 260 vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

► remove from comparison AMD R9 8945HS

The Ryzen 9 8945HS is a rebadged Ryzen 9 7940HS with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. To be more specific, this is a powerful Hawk Point family laptop chip that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. This APU was brought to life in H2 2023 and all of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8945HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600; no ECC support). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane. 20 lanes are available.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The 8945HS is an R9 7940HS in disguise, so it's realistic to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-12900HK and also the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1. More importantly, it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 8945HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 260

► remove from comparison AMD R7 260

The Ryzen 7 260 is a fast Hawk Point family chip for laptops that was announced at CES 2025. It features 8 Zen 4 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. The chip is identical to the old Ryzen 7 8845HS and therefore also the Ryzen 7 7840HS (which did have a lower clocked NPU).

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 260 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen 7 has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

Please note that the APU isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the R7 260 is an 8845HS / 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with low of very low settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the APU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing as powerful as possible. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this Ryzen.

The R7 260 is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties. Compared to the consumer 8840HS, the PRO variant supports AMD PRO technologies with management features and usually longer availability and support.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the R7 PRO 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 8945HSAMD Ryzen 7 260AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP45 Watt45 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 8945HS
40.7 pt (68%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 260
40.1 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 8840HS
39.3 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 103     avg: 106.7     median: 107 (60%)     max: 109.2 Points
104 Points (58%)
103.7 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 852     avg: 945     median: 959.5 (18%)     max: 988 Points
786 Points (15%)
869 Points (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 15516     avg: 16743     median: 16937 (16%)     max: 17376 Points
15864 Points (15%)
min: 14621     avg: 14784     median: 14784 (14%)     max: 14947 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1719     avg: 1800     median: 1806.5 (77%)     max: 1825 Points
1760 Points (75%)
min: 1712     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (73%)     max: 1736 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 676     avg: 700     median: 700.5 (78%)     max: 711 Points
690 Points (76%)
min: 671     avg: 673     median: 673 (75%)     max: 675 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6153     avg: 6559     median: 6621.5 (16%)     max: 6785 Points
6161 Points (15%)
min: 5760     avg: 5820     median: 5819.5 (14%)     max: 5879 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2521     avg: 2654     median: 2649.5 (17%)     max: 2775 Points
2564 Points (16%)
min: 2427     avg: 2458     median: 2458 (16%)     max: 2489 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 265     avg: 281.4     median: 282.5 (79%)     max: 288 Points
278 Points (78%)
min: 271     avg: 271.5     median: 271.5 (76%)     max: 272 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 29.14     avg: 30.8     median: 31.1 (40%)     max: 31.77 Points
30.1 Points (39%)
26.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.28     avg: 3.4     median: 3.4 (81%)     max: 3.45 Points
3.3 Points (78%)
2.6 Points (61%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 7594     avg: 7767     median: 7785.5 (47%)     max: 7901 Points
7384 Points (45%)
5809 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 46572     avg: 48831     median: 49299 (36%)     max: 50153 Points
45689 Points (33%)
39747 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 84253     avg: 87958     median: 89478 (57%)     max: 90144 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14451     avg: 14535     median: 14561 (18%)     max: 14593 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 67.933     avg: 108.7     median: 85.2 (1%)     max: 196.4 s
362.5 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.563     avg: 3.5     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 6.2 s
7.9 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 7332     avg: 10823     median: 7793.5 (12%)     max: 20374 Points
7121 Points (11%)
21172 Points (34%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 66557     avg: 71014     median: 71534 (41%)     max: 73742 MIPS
63076 MIPS (36%)
min: 63624     avg: 63845     median: 63845 (37%)     max: 64066 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5994     avg: 6460     median: 6576.5 (78%)     max: 6691 MIPS
6439 MIPS (76%)
min: 6261     avg: 6289     median: 6289 (74%)     max: 6317 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 141.2     avg: 149     median: 150.7 (50%)     max: 155 fps
96%
1 R7 260 +
144.6 fps (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 297     avg: 298.3     median: 298 (69%)     max: 300 fps
90%
1 R7 260 +
269.1 fps (62%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 19.8     avg: 21.1     median: 21.1 (37%)     max: 22.2 fps
17.6 fps (31%)
min: 17.8     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (31%)     max: 18 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.3     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (38%)     max: 1.4 GB/s
1.3 GB/s (38%)
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (35%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
2.1 GB/s (36%)
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 14.5     avg: 15     median: 15 (39%)     max: 15.4 GB/s
11.4 GB/s (30%)
14.2 GB/s (37%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 293     avg: 310.8     median: 312 (4%)     max: 326 Seconds
322 Seconds (4%)
min: 345     avg: 354.5     median: 354.5 (5%)     max: 364 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 186     avg: 194     median: 192.5 (1%)     max: 206 Seconds
204 Seconds (1%)
min: 212     avg: 217     median: 217 (2%)     max: 222 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4294     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4576 sec
0.4 sec (10%)
min: 0.4568     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4747 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 15007     avg: 15716     median: 15691 (33%)     max: 16449 Points
96%
1 R7 260 +
14995 Points (32%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.962     avg: 7.1     median: 7 (2%)     max: 7.2 s
7 s (2%)
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.31     avg: 17.5     median: 17.5 (1%)     max: 17.8 s
17.6 s (1%)
20.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 576.7     avg: 615     median: 624.7 (3%)     max: 644.49 s
529 s (2%)
571 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 69373     avg: 82115     median: 84110 (65%)     max: 88101 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17239     avg: 21793     median: 22257.5 (55%)     max: 25276 Points
17725 Points (44%)
min: 20839     avg: 20940     median: 20940 (52%)     max: 21041 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 82144     avg: 86374     median: 84952.5 (69%)     max: 92815 Points
99%
1 R7 260 +
84022 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 83482     avg: 86934     median: 85496 (69%)     max: 93057 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 86257     avg: 88776     median: 87230 (72%)     max: 94974 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13624     avg: 19839     median: 20539 (52%)     max: 21573 Points
94%
1 R7 260 +
19375 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 23442     avg: 27506     median: 27488.5 (49%)     max: 30090 Points
25641 Points (46%)
min: 23922     avg: 24665     median: 24664.5 (44%)     max: 25407 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8883     avg: 10993     median: 11086 (47%)     max: 11856 Points
9216 Points (39%)
min: 8914     avg: 9434     median: 9433.5 (40%)     max: 9953 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2399     avg: 2649     median: 2667.5 (67%)     max: 2745 Points
2622 Points (65%)
min: 2594     avg: 2607     median: 2607 (65%)     max: 2620 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12015     avg: 13232     median: 13255.5 (51%)     max: 13715 Points
10180 Points (40%)
min: 12118     avg: 12481     median: 12480.5 (48%)     max: 12843 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2575     avg: 2900     median: 3105 (99%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12920     avg: 17803     median: 21003 (86%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1835     avg: 1950     median: 1979.5 (77%)     max: 2039 Points
1948 Points (76%)
1925 Points (75%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10985     avg: 11970     median: 12008.5 (22%)     max: 12520 Points
9848 Points (18%)
min: 11318     avg: 11430     median: 11430 (20%)     max: 11542 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1841     avg: 1903     median: 1907 (8%)     max: 1930 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11804     avg: 12252     median: 12315 (39%)     max: 12573 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7933     avg: 8130     median: 8140 (81%)     max: 8278 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 46366     avg: 48538     median: 49269 (49%)     max: 49654 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R7 260 +
7721 Points (100%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R7 260 +
41046 Points (88%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 488     avg: 524     median: 507.5 (1%)     max: 586 ms
min: 537     avg: 538     median: 537.5 (1%)     max: 538 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94227 Points (72%)
86267 Points (66%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 226     avg: 259.7     median: 267 (73%)     max: 275 Points
261 Points (72%)
min: 226     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (66%)     max: 251 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 268     avg: 313.3     median: 316 (57%)     max: 344 Points
276 Points (50%)
min: 298     avg: 304.9     median: 304.9 (55%)     max: 311.8 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1767     avg: 1825     median: 1839.5 (69%)     max: 1866 Points
min: 1648     avg: 1701     median: 1701 (64%)     max: 1754 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 72.5     avg: 89.6     median: 86.8 (15%)     max: 126.4 Watt
127%
1 R7 260 +
68.3 Watt (12%)
min: 59.1     avg: 61     median: 61 (11%)     max: 62.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 70.3     avg: 89.4     median: 84.1 (15%)     max: 130.5 Watt
61.6 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 4.93     avg: 12.3     median: 10.6 (7%)     max: 21.6 Watt
261%
1 R7 260 +
4.1 Watt (3%)
min: 6.65     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 7.55 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 8.62     avg: 16.2     median: 17.6 (19%)     max: 22.5 Watt
405%
1 R7 260 +
4.4 Watt (5%)
min: 6.31     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (7%)     max: 6.62 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 28.4     avg: 32.8     median: 33.4 (25%)     max: 35.9 Points per Watt
39.4 Points per Watt (29%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS → 100% n=34

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 260 → 94% n=34

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS → 96% n=34

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 28. 22:55:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16397 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19156 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18727 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:16:39 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16397 +0.004s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 16397 +0.016s ... 0.026s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 19156 +0.002s ... 0.027s

#11 got single benchmarks 19156 +0s ... 0.027s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18727 +0.001s ... 0.029s

#13 got single benchmarks 18727 +0.001s ... 0.029s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.084s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.084s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)