Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 8945H vs AMD Ryzen 9 270 vs AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

AMD Ryzen 9 8945H

► remove from comparison AMD R9 8945H

The Ryzen 9 8945H is a rebadged Ryzen 9 7940HS with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. To be more specific, this is a powerful Hawk Point family laptop chip that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. All of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

Compared to the 8945HS, the H seems to be a local variant for China and offers the same specifications.

The Radeon 780M serves as the integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8945H has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast RAM (up to LPDDR5x-7500 or DDR5-5600; no ECC support). The processor is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt; PCIe support is limited to the 4.0 spec for a throughput of 1.97 GB/s per lane. 20 lanes are available.

OS support is limited to 64-bit editions of Windows 11 and Windows 10 and of course to Linux. Note that the chip isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The 8945H is an R9 7940HS in disguise, so it's realistic to expect the chip to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-12900HK and also the Ryzen 7 7840HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) running at up to 2,800 MHz. This is a very fast iGPU, as of late 2023. It will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p, and it is also capable of HW-encoding and HW-decoding the most widely used video codecs including AVC, HEVC and AV1. More importantly, it is fast enough for proper 1080p gaming as long as one is fine with low to medium detail settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The 8945H is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 9 270

► remove from comparison AMD R9 270

The Ryzen 9 270 is a rebadged Ryzen 9 8945HS, making it a fast mobile laptop processor. This is an APU of the Hawk Point family that has eight Zen 4 cores running at 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz. This APU was introduced at CES 2025 and all of its cores are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads.

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 9 270 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the chip has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM while also being compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving fast NVMe SSD up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interface).

Performance

Its CPU performance is slated to be identical to the old Ryzen 9 8945HS and R9 7940HS.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,800 MHz. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. As for gaming, most 2024 games run fine at 1080p with settings set to Low on this graphics adapter.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of the system is, how fast the RAM of the system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 9 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving laptop makers a choice between longer battery life and higher performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a system powered by this chip.

The R9 270 is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for a reasonably good, as of early 2025, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 8945HAMD Ryzen 9 270AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 « 4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock4000 - 5200 MHz4000 - 5200 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP45 Watt45 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2800 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 8945H
40.4 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840HS
38.6 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
103.3 Points (58%)
min: 99     avg: 100.7     median: 99.6 (56%)     max: 103.6 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
960 Points (18%)
min: 675     avg: 714     median: 677 (13%)     max: 790 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 17423     avg: 17604     median: 17604 (16%)     max: 17785 Points
min: 12359     avg: 13222     median: 13082 (12%)     max: 14060 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1812     avg: 1813     median: 1813 (77%)     max: 1814 Points
min: 1719     avg: 1736     median: 1737 (74%)     max: 1746 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 638     avg: 654     median: 654 (73%)     max: 670 Points
min: 649     avg: 669     median: 671 (74%)     max: 681 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 6859     avg: 6908     median: 6907.5 (17%)     max: 6956 Points
min: 4788     avg: 5121     median: 4994 (12%)     max: 5556 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2605     avg: 2734     median: 2777 (18%)     max: 2819 Points
min: 1934     avg: 2070     median: 2045 (13%)     max: 2244 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 283     avg: 283.5     median: 283.5 (80%)     max: 284 Points
min: 261     avg: 267.8     median: 270 (76%)     max: 270 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
64 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.6 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7339 Points (12%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 72851     avg: 73037     median: 73036.5 (42%)     max: 73222 MIPS
min: 49930     avg: 57219     median: 59682 (34%)     max: 61047 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6615     avg: 6640     median: 6639.5 (78%)     max: 6664 MIPS
min: 5702     avg: 6151     median: 6205 (73%)     max: 6493 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
158.9 fps (53%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
284.5 fps (66%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 21.9     avg: 22.2     median: 22.2 (39%)     max: 22.4 fps
min: 13.1     avg: 15.6     median: 15.7 (28%)     max: 17.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15.7 GB/s (41%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 286     avg: 289.5     median: 289.5 (4%)     max: 293 Seconds
min: 369     avg: 407.8     median: 404 (5%)     max: 486 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 178     avg: 180     median: 180 (1%)     max: 182 Seconds
min: 226     avg: 246     median: 232 (2%)     max: 297 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4298     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4346 sec
min: 0.439     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4774 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
15945 Points (34%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
6.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
621 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 20449     avg: 22111     median: 22111 (55%)     max: 23773 Points
min: 17441     avg: 17857     median: 17623 (44%)     max: 18690 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 16214     avg: 16905     median: 16660 (42%)     max: 17842 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 27032     avg: 27721     median: 27721 (49%)     max: 28410 Points
min: 18812     avg: 21790     median: 22488 (40%)     max: 23382 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 11800     avg: 11812     median: 11811.5 (50%)     max: 11823 Points
min: 7391     avg: 8296     median: 8297 (35%)     max: 9011 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2692     avg: 2702     median: 2701.5 (67%)     max: 2711 Points
min: 2477     avg: 2550     median: 2552 (64%)     max: 2602 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 12638     avg: 12650     median: 12650 (49%)     max: 12662 Points
min: 9922     avg: 11062     median: 11279 (44%)     max: 11700 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1991     avg: 1993     median: 1993 (78%)     max: 1995 Points
min: 1822     avg: 1906     median: 1928 (75%)     max: 1946 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11949     avg: 11989     median: 11988.5 (21%)     max: 12028 Points
min: 9229     avg: 9948     median: 9897 (18%)     max: 10884 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1927 Points (8%)
min: 1796     avg: 1825     median: 1817 (8%)     max: 1863 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
11903 Points (38%)
min: 9436     avg: 10052     median: 9866 (31%)     max: 10854 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
505 ms (1%)
min: 518     avg: 537     median: 538 (1%)     max: 563 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
96399 Points (74%)
min: 89899     avg: 93041     median: 93040.5 (71%)     max: 96182 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
263 Points (72%)
min: 246     avg: 249.6     median: 248 (68%)     max: 257 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
308 Points (55%)
min: 297     avg: 328.2     median: 299 (54%)     max: 440 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1800 Points (67%)
min: 1643     avg: 1670     median: 1672 (63%)     max: 1698 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
107.5 Watt (19%)
min: 37.9     avg: 44.7     median: 46.6 (8%)     max: 53 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.3     avg: 41.3     median: 42.6 (8%)     max: 53.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
19.8 Watt (13%)
min: 4.62     avg: 5.4     median: 5.3 (4%)     max: 6.09 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
11.7 Watt (13%)
min: 5.36     avg: 6     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 7.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 42.3     avg: 46     median: 45.9 (34%)     max: 49.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 8945H → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 28. 16:22:32

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17942 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19154 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 16413 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:16:39 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17942 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 17942 +0.005s ... 0.013s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 19154 +0s ... 0.014s

#11 got single benchmarks 19154 +0s ... 0.014s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16413 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#13 got single benchmarks 16413 +0.006s ... 0.023s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.03s ... 0.053s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.053s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)