Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U vs AMD Ryzen 5 8640U vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230

AMD Ryzen 7 8840U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840U

The Ryzen 7 8840U is a powerful laptop processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new APU; instead, the R7 8840U is a rebadged R7 7840U with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. Its eight Zen 4 cores run at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz and are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads. The great Radeon 780M iGPU is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are promised to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more powerful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840U has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving fast NVMe SSD up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around the 8840U are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8840U is a 7840U in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This means the chip is fast enough to make 99% of consumers happy, as of December 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W. Laptop makers are free to change that value significantly, with values as low as 15 W and as high as 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840U is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 8640U

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640U

The Ryzen 5 8640U is a Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. This is not a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. Just like the 7640U, the R5 8640U has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are said to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640U has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of H2 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640U is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the chip to be at least 10% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. This iGPU will happily drive up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it also will HW-decode and HW-encode AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat. VP9 videos can be decoded but not encoded. As far as gaming is concerned, the average 760M in our database is reasonably close to the GeForce MX550 and the Radeon 680M. In early 2024, this means the latest games can only be played at 1600x900 with most settings set to Low.

Power consumption

The 8640U has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 15 W and 30 W. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640U is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230

► remove from comparison AMD R5 PRO 230

The Ryzen 5 PRO 230 (or R5 PRO 230) is a Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in early 2025. This is not a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 8640U and Ryzen 5 7640U with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. Just like the older chips, the R5 230 has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter. Compared to the consumer Ryzen 5 230, the PRO model offers additional security, manageability, and reliability features designed for professional users and workstation environments, such as Secure Processor (an ARM security co-processor).

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these chips are said to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop even more powerful.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the R5 PRO 230 has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of H2 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the Ryzen 5 230 is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

The CPU performance is the same as the older Ryzen 5 8640U and Ryzen 5 7640U due to the same specifications. That means the performance is in the mid range of laptop chips and still well suited for even demanding tasks.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. This iGPU will happily drive up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it also will HW-decode and HW-encode AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat. VP9 videos can be decoded but not encoded. As far as gaming is concerned, the average 760M in our database is reasonably close to the GeForce MX550 and the Radeon 680M. In early 2024, this means the latest games can only be played at 1600x900 with most settings set to Low.

Power consumption

The R5 PRO 230 has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 15 W and 30 W. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the R5 PRO 230 is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 8840UAMD Ryzen 5 8640UAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230
CodenameHawk Point-U (Zen 4)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-U (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 7 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z23.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z23.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2503.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z23.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2303.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 230 « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640U3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3300 - 5100 MHz3500 - 4900 MHz3500 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB384 KB384 KB
L2 Cache8 MB6 MB6 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt28 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840U
38.1 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 8640U
37 pt (62%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
98 Points (55%)
96 Points (54%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
748 Points (14%)
581 Points (11%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10162     avg: 12191     median: 12972 (12%)     max: 13563 Points
10433 Points (10%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1088     avg: 1619     median: 1703 (72%)     max: 1740 Points
1651 Points (70%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 427     avg: 621     median: 665 (74%)     max: 680 Points
644 Points (71%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3987     avg: 4817     median: 5067 (12%)     max: 5336 Points
4096 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1539     avg: 2003     median: 2024 (13%)     max: 2453 Points
1663 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 176.6     avg: 249.7     median: 266 (75%)     max: 275 Points
256 Points (72%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
24.1 Points (31%)
19 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (76%)
3 Points (72%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7381 Points (45%)
7211 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
41306 Points (30%)
34915 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
71128 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13618 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
84.3 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3.3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5930 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 47579     avg: 54539     median: 57550 (33%)     max: 59549 MIPS
47187 MIPS (27%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4168     avg: 5727     median: 6012 (71%)     max: 6469 MIPS
6018 MIPS (71%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
118.7 fps (40%)
94.8 fps (32%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
267 fps (62%)
238 fps (55%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 12.5     avg: 15.2     median: 15.8 (28%)     max: 16.5 fps
11.9 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
0.9 GB/s (26%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.7 GB/s (29%)
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.5 GB/s (30%)
9.2 GB/s (24%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 383     avg: 423.6     median: 405 (5%)     max: 517 Seconds
499 Seconds (6%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 239     avg: 264.4     median: 246 (2%)     max: 315 Seconds
301 Seconds (2%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4514     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.678 sec
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13841     avg: 14195     median: 14245 (30%)     max: 14498 Points
13014 Points (28%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.8 s (2%)
7.6 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
21.3 s (1%)
18.4 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
754 s (3%)
670 s (3%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 67701     avg: 68184     median: 68141 (52%)     max: 68709 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 13875     avg: 16398     median: 17132 (43%)     max: 18587 Points
15121 Points (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 51143     avg: 64986     median: 64712.5 (53%)     max: 79375 Points
76663 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 51152     avg: 61249     median: 51313 (42%)     max: 81282 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 78859     avg: 83002     median: 84626 (70%)     max: 85520 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10973     avg: 14368     median: 13601 (34%)     max: 17112 Points
12271 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 17856     avg: 20716     median: 21341 (38%)     max: 23864 Points
18779 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6208     avg: 8025     median: 8271 (35%)     max: 9004 Points
6578 Points (28%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1654     avg: 2354     median: 2528 (63%)     max: 2607 Points
2464 Points (62%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9609     avg: 10699     median: 10366 (40%)     max: 12664 Points
9903 Points (38%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2384 Points (76%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
10532 Points (43%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1278     avg: 1761     median: 1879 (73%)     max: 1937 Points
1822 Points (71%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8205     avg: 9600     median: 9258 (17%)     max: 11296 Points
8507 Points (15%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1817 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8056 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7340 Points (95%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
31951 Points (69%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 515     avg: 581     median: 539 (1%)     max: 779 ms
551 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 170.4     avg: 225.3     median: 240.8 (66%)     max: 249 Points
235 Points (65%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 216     avg: 286.2     median: 303 (54%)     max: 306 Points
272 Points (49%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1541     avg: 1639     median: 1625 (61%)     max: 1766 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 31.5     avg: 43.2     median: 48.2 (8%)     max: 50 Watt
35.6 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 28.2     avg: 41.9     median: 41.9 (8%)     max: 55.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 5.47     avg: 9.5     median: 6.2 (4%)     max: 16.9 Watt
5 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.93     avg: 10.8     median: 9.4 (10%)     max: 22.5 Watt
10.4 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
54.6 Points per Watt (41%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840U → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 8640U → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 26. 08:18:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16401 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16405 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 19166 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Apr 2025 05:16:04 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16401 +0.003s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 16401 +0.009s ... 0.021s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16405 +0.003s ... 0.024s

#11 got single benchmarks 16405 +0.004s ... 0.028s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 19166 +0s ... 0.029s

#13 got single benchmarks 19166 +0s ... 0.029s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.042s ... 0.071s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.071s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)