Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 260 vs AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS

AMD Ryzen 7 260

► remove from comparison AMD R7 260

The Ryzen 7 260 is a fast Hawk Point family chip for laptops that was announced at CES 2025. It features 8 Zen 4 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. The chip is identical to the old Ryzen 7 8845HS and therefore also the Ryzen 7 7840HS (which did have a lower clocked NPU).

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 260 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen 7 has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

Please note that the APU isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the R7 260 is an 8845HS / 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with low of very low settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the APU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing as powerful as possible. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this Ryzen.

The R7 260 is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS

► remove from comparison Ryzen 7X4X/8X4X CPU

The Ryzen 7 8745HS is a China-only Hawk Point family chip that never received an official launch. Targeted at gaming and productivity laptops but widely used in mini-PCs, too, the 8745HS features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 4.9 GHz, along with the still fairly capable Radeon 780M iGPU. There is no NPU here.

As an APU meant for use within China, this Ryzen 7 should be fully compliant with the Chinese government-approved cryptography standards.

The only difference between the 8745HS and the 8745H is the slightly lower default wattage of the latter, potentially leading to slightly lower clock speeds.

Performance

We fully expect this Zen 4 architecture processor to be about as fast as the Ryzen 7 7745HX (8 Zen 4 cores, 3.6 GHz to 5.1 GHz) meaning its multi-thread performance is a little better than the Core Ultra 9 185H but a few percentage points behind the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Architecture and Features

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support along with other improvements, like larger caches/registers/buffers across the board. Elsewhere, the 8745HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). There are 20 PCI-Express 4 lanes for connecting devices such as NVMe SSDs (1.97 GB/s per lane) and graphics cards; USB 4 / Thunderbolt support is onboard, too. Please note that the APU isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered on to the motherboard for good (FP7r2 or FP8 socket interfaces).

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,600 MHz) can drive 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, AVC, HEVC). As far as gaming is concerned, many titles are still playable at 1080p as of early 2025 albeit with most settings dialed down do Lowest or Low.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing faster. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 260AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS « 3.8 - 4.9 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS compare3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3800 - 5100 MHz3800 - 4900 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP45 Watt35 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP8FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2600 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 260
40.1 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8745HS
39.2 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
104 Points (58%)
101 Points (57%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
786 Points (15%)
869 Points (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15864 Points (15%)
16236 Points (15%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1760 Points (75%)
1701 Points (72%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
690 Points (76%)
658 Points (73%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6161 Points (15%)
6351 Points (15%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
2564 Points (16%)
2578 Points (16%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
278 Points (78%)
263 Points (74%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
30.1 Points (39%)
30.5 Points (40%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.3 Points (78%)
3.2 Points (76%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7384 Points (45%)
7299 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
45689 Points (33%)
46569 Points (34%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
86842 Points (55%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
13867 Points (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
70.2 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
7121 Points (11%)
6655 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
63076 MIPS (36%)
63912 MIPS (37%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6439 MIPS (76%)
6334 MIPS (75%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
144.6 fps (48%)
147.6 fps (49%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
269.1 fps (62%)
265.5 fps (61%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
17.6 fps (31%)
18.4 fps (32%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.1 GB/s (36%)
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
11.4 GB/s (30%)
11 GB/s (29%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
322 Seconds (4%)
308 Seconds (4%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
204 Seconds (1%)
197 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.4 sec (10%)
0.5 sec (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
14995 Points (32%)
min: 14260     avg: 14551     median: 14551 (31%)     max: 14842 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7 s (2%)
7.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.6 s (1%)
18.3 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 R7 260 +
529 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 81786     avg: 82112     median: 82112 (63%)     max: 82438 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
17725 Points (44%)
min: 18094     avg: 18440     median: 18440 (45%)     max: 18786 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
84022 Points (68%)
min: 80377     avg: 82709     median: 82709 (67%)     max: 85041 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 80119     avg: 82359     median: 82358.5 (67%)     max: 84598 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
83423 Points (69%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
19375 Points (49%)
min: 19399     avg: 19901     median: 19901 (50%)     max: 20403 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
25641 Points (46%)
min: 25815     avg: 26950     median: 26949.5 (48%)     max: 28084 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
9216 Points (39%)
min: 8644     avg: 10058     median: 10057.5 (42%)     max: 11471 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2622 Points (65%)
min: 2522     avg: 2536     median: 2536 (63%)     max: 2550 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
10180 Points (40%)
min: 9801     avg: 9879     median: 9878.5 (38%)     max: 9956 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1948 Points (76%)
min: 1865     avg: 1870     median: 1870 (73%)     max: 1875 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
9848 Points (18%)
min: 9645     avg: 9755     median: 9754.5 (17%)     max: 9864 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1761     avg: 1787     median: 1787 (8%)     max: 1813 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9697     avg: 9756     median: 9756 (31%)     max: 9815 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7430     avg: 7545     median: 7544.5 (75%)     max: 7659 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 40481     avg: 40487     median: 40487 (40%)     max: 40493 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 R7 260 +
7721 Points (94%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 R7 260 +
41046 Points (88%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
537 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
261 Points (72%)
251 Points (69%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
276 Points (50%)
290 Points (52%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1638 Points (61%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 260 +
68.3 Watt (12%)
92.5 Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
101.4 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R7 260 +
4.1 Watt (3%)
7.4 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 R7 260 +
4.4 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
25.4 Points per Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 260 → 100% n=38

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8745HS → 100% n=38

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 31. 12:19:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 19156 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19649 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 31 May 2025 05:19:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 19156 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 19156 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19649 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 19649 +0.005s ... 0.023s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.044s ... 0.067s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.068s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)