Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is a mid-range, Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. The 8640HS isn't actually a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8640HS has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of late 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640HS is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the APU to be at least 15% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. While not great for gaming (unless you are fine with resolutions such as 900p and low detail settings), the iGPU will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It also HW-decodes and HW-encodes the most widely used video codecs including AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat.

Power consumption

The 8640HS has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 20 W and 30 W. Most companies will probably go for a higher value to get better performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640HS is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 PRO 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties. Compared to the consumer 8840HS, the PRO variant supports AMD PRO technologies with management features and usually longer availability and support.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the R7 PRO 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 8640HSAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 270 compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compare4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS compare3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 240 compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS compare4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3500 - 4900 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB
L2 Cache6 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 8640HS
37.8 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 8840HS
39.3 pt (65%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
97 Points (54%)
103.7 Points (58%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
634 Points (12%)
869 Points (16%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11486 Points (11%)
min: 14621     avg: 14784     median: 14784 (14%)     max: 14947 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1711 Points (73%)
min: 1712     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (73%)     max: 1736 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
664 Points (74%)
min: 671     avg: 673     median: 673 (75%)     max: 675 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4475 Points (11%)
min: 5760     avg: 5820     median: 5819.5 (14%)     max: 5879 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1845 Points (12%)
min: 2427     avg: 2458     median: 2458 (16%)     max: 2489 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
268 Points (75%)
min: 271     avg: 271.5     median: 271.5 (76%)     max: 272 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
21.6 Points (28%)
26.4 Points (34%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (76%)
2.6 Points (61%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7163 Points (43%)
5809 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
38415 Points (28%)
39747 Points (29%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
362.5 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
7.9 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6125 Points (10%)
21172 Points (34%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
49939 MIPS (29%)
min: 63624     avg: 63845     median: 63845 (37%)     max: 64066 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5975 MIPS (70%)
min: 6261     avg: 6289     median: 6289 (74%)     max: 6317 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
108.8 fps (36%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
260.1 fps (60%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
14.5 fps (25%)
min: 17.8     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (31%)     max: 18 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (29%)
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.6 GB/s (28%)
2 GB/s (34%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.8 GB/s (28%)
14.2 GB/s (37%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
452 Seconds (6%)
min: 345     avg: 354.5     median: 354.5 (5%)     max: 364 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
276 Seconds (2%)
min: 212     avg: 217     median: 217 (2%)     max: 222 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
min: 0.4568     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4747 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12782 Points (27%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.2 s (2%)
8.7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.4 s (1%)
20.7 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
683 s (3%)
571 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15544 Points (39%)
min: 20839     avg: 20940     median: 20940 (52%)     max: 21041 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
75919 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
13365 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
21026 Points (37%)
min: 23922     avg: 24665     median: 24664.5 (44%)     max: 25407 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7059 Points (30%)
min: 8914     avg: 9434     median: 9433.5 (40%)     max: 9953 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2413     avg: 2455     median: 2455 (61%)     max: 2497 Points
min: 2594     avg: 2607     median: 2607 (65%)     max: 2620 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9120     avg: 9729     median: 9729 (38%)     max: 10338 Points
min: 12118     avg: 12481     median: 12480.5 (48%)     max: 12843 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1877 Points (73%)
1925 Points (75%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
9060 Points (16%)
min: 11318     avg: 11430     median: 11430 (20%)     max: 11542 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7558 Points (98%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
37474 Points (80%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
551 ms (1%)
min: 537     avg: 538     median: 537.5 (1%)     max: 538 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
86267 Points (66%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
248 Points (68%)
min: 226     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (66%)     max: 251 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
292 Points (52%)
min: 298     avg: 304.9     median: 304.9 (55%)     max: 311.8 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1648     avg: 1701     median: 1701 (64%)     max: 1754 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
51.4 Watt (9%)
min: 59.1     avg: 61     median: 61 (11%)     max: 62.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
61.6 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.4 Watt (2%)
min: 6.65     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 7.55 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.2 Watt (6%)
min: 6.31     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (7%)     max: 6.62 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
39.4 Points per Watt (29%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS → 100% n=35

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS → 121% n=35

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 27. 23:52:47

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16411 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18727 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Apr 2025 05:16:04 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16411 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 16411 +0s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18727 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#10 got single benchmarks 18727 +0.005s ... 0.014s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.041s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.041s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)