Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 260 vs AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is a mid-range, Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. The 8640HS isn't actually a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8640HS has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of late 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640HS is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the APU to be at least 15% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. While not great for gaming (unless you are fine with resolutions such as 900p and low detail settings), the iGPU will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It also HW-decodes and HW-encodes the most widely used video codecs including AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat.

Power consumption

The 8640HS has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 20 W and 30 W. Most companies will probably go for a higher value to get better performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640HS is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 260

► remove from comparison AMD R7 260

The Ryzen 7 260 is a fast Hawk Point family chip for laptops that was announced at CES 2025. It features 8 Zen 4 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. The chip is identical to the old Ryzen 7 8845HS and therefore also the Ryzen 7 7840HS (which did have a lower clocked NPU).

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 260 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen 7 has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

Please note that the APU isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the R7 260 is an 8845HS / 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with low of very low settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the APU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing as powerful as possible. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this Ryzen.

The R7 260 is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8845HS

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is a powerful Hawk Point family chip that we believe to be a Ryzen 7 7840HS in disguise but with higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The R7 8845HS was brought to life in H2 2023; it features 8 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. Last but not the least, the Radeon 780M serves as the integrated GPU.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say that there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD uncorks its 2nd generation Ryzen AI technology meaning the new processors are expected to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs. Dozens of popular apps such as DaVinci Resolve support this technology, as of late 2023.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers across the board, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8845HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600, ECC-enabled memory included). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

This Ryzen 7 series chip is designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10 or Linux; please note that it isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the 8845HS is a 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned. This is a very fast chip, as of Q3 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with moderate quality settings. Long story short, this is the best iGPU money can buy, as of H2 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing insanely fast. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this APU.

The R7 8845HS is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 8640HSAMD Ryzen 7 260AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3500 - 4900 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache6 MB8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt45 Watt45 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
iGPUAMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 8640HS
37.8 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 260
40.1 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8845HS
39.9 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
97 Points (54%)
104 Points (58%)
min: 102     avg: 104.4     median: 103.8 (58%)     max: 107.8 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
634 Points (12%)
786 Points (15%)
min: 567     avg: 869     median: 902 (17%)     max: 956 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11486 Points (11%)
15864 Points (15%)
min: 14895     avg: 16165     median: 16192 (15%)     max: 18037 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1711 Points (73%)
1760 Points (75%)
min: 1623     avg: 1751     median: 1769 (75%)     max: 1783 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
664 Points (74%)
690 Points (76%)
min: 673     avg: 686     median: 685 (76%)     max: 698 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4475 Points (11%)
6161 Points (15%)
min: 5808     avg: 6317     median: 6346 (15%)     max: 7026 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1845 Points (12%)
2564 Points (16%)
min: 2342     avg: 2563     median: 2575 (16%)     max: 2908 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
268 Points (75%)
278 Points (78%)
min: 269     avg: 276     median: 276 (78%)     max: 283 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
21.6 Points (28%)
30.1 Points (39%)
min: 29.28     avg: 29.8     median: 29.8 (39%)     max: 30.3 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (76%)
3.3 Points (78%)
min: 3.29     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (79%)     max: 3.34 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7163 Points (43%)
7384 Points (45%)
min: 7426     avg: 7545     median: 7523 (45%)     max: 7685 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
38415 Points (28%)
45689 Points (33%)
min: 47332     avg: 47532     median: 47500 (34%)     max: 47764 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 85872     avg: 86827     median: 86827 (55%)     max: 87782 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 14163     avg: 14360     median: 14360 (17%)     max: 14557 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 70.718     avg: 113.2     median: 98.9 (1%)     max: 170 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.703     avg: 3.6     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 5.3 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6125 Points (10%)
7121 Points (11%)
min: 7275     avg: 11203     median: 7327 (12%)     max: 19008 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
49939 MIPS (29%)
63076 MIPS (36%)
min: 62669     avg: 68390     median: 68354 (39%)     max: 74664 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5975 MIPS (70%)
6439 MIPS (76%)
min: 5197     avg: 6319     median: 6393 (75%)     max: 6714 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
108.8 fps (36%)
144.6 fps (48%)
min: 143.7     avg: 146.8     median: 146.8 (49%)     max: 149.8 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
260.1 fps (60%)
269.1 fps (62%)
min: 286.5     avg: 287.8     median: 287.8 (66%)     max: 289 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
14.5 fps (25%)
17.6 fps (31%)
min: 18.6     avg: 20.1     median: 20.4 (36%)     max: 22.7 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (29%)
1.3 GB/s (38%)
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.6 GB/s (28%)
2.1 GB/s (36%)
min: 2     avg: 2     median: 2 (34%)     max: 2.1 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.8 GB/s (28%)
11.4 GB/s (30%)
min: 14     avg: 14.4     median: 14.4 (38%)     max: 14.9 GB/s
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
452 Seconds (6%)
322 Seconds (4%)
min: 288     avg: 326.8     median: 318 (4%)     max: 367 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
276 Seconds (2%)
204 Seconds (1%)
min: 179     avg: 200.9     median: 198 (1%)     max: 216 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
0.4 sec (10%)
min: 0.4304     avg: 0.5     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.4935 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12782 Points (27%)
14995 Points (32%)
min: 15091     avg: 15422     median: 15313 (33%)     max: 15969 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.2 s (2%)
7 s (2%)
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.1 (2%)     max: 7.331 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.4 s (1%)
17.6 s (1%)
min: 17.6     avg: 17.8     median: 17.7 (1%)     max: 18.138 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
683 s (3%)
529 s (2%)
min: 659.5     avg: 662     median: 662.4 (3%)     max: 665.289 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 82048     avg: 82541     median: 82586.5 (63%)     max: 82943 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15544 Points (39%)
17725 Points (44%)
min: 19492     avg: 22379     median: 22207 (55%)     max: 26212 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
75919 Points (62%)
84022 Points (68%)
min: 81620     avg: 84501     median: 84429 (69%)     max: 88462 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 81607     avg: 85179     median: 85402 (69%)     max: 88305 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 83958     avg: 87188     median: 85870 (71%)     max: 93052 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
13365 Points (34%)
19375 Points (49%)
min: 18507     avg: 20158     median: 20268.5 (51%)     max: 22215 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
21026 Points (37%)
25641 Points (46%)
min: 25099     avg: 27322     median: 27428 (49%)     max: 30715 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7059 Points (30%)
9216 Points (39%)
min: 8550     avg: 11247     median: 10853 (46%)     max: 19164 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2413     avg: 2455     median: 2455 (61%)     max: 2497 Points
2622 Points (65%)
min: 2510     avg: 2624     median: 2630 (66%)     max: 2698 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9120     avg: 9729     median: 9729 (38%)     max: 10338 Points
10180 Points (40%)
min: 11073     avg: 12854     median: 12998 (50%)     max: 14014 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 2577     avg: 2844     median: 2846 (90%)     max: 3105 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 12719     avg: 16862     median: 16862.5 (69%)     max: 21003 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1877 Points (73%)
1948 Points (76%)
min: 1765     avg: 1931     median: 1949 (76%)     max: 2004 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
9060 Points (16%)
9848 Points (18%)
min: 11256     avg: 11906     median: 11864 (21%)     max: 12726 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1869     avg: 1895     median: 1898 (8%)     max: 1914 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11742     avg: 12016     median: 12086 (38%)     max: 12109 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8034     avg: 8109     median: 8077.5 (81%)     max: 8245 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 47602     avg: 48576     median: 48614.5 (48%)     max: 49473 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7558 Points (98%)
102%
1 R7 260 +
7721 Points (100%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
37474 Points (80%)
110%
1 R7 260 +
41046 Points (88%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
551 ms (1%)
min: 496     avg: 534     median: 527 (1%)     max: 664 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 85632     avg: 90739     median: 90496 (70%)     max: 96330 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
248 Points (68%)
261 Points (72%)
min: 176.4     avg: 255.2     median: 256.5 (70%)     max: 314 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
292 Points (52%)
276 Points (50%)
min: 275     avg: 304.2     median: 305 (55%)     max: 334 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1531     avg: 1772     median: 1795.5 (67%)     max: 1939 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
51.4 Watt (9%)
75%
1 R7 260 +
68.3 Watt (12%)
min: 42.5     avg: 82.2     median: 81.1 (14%)     max: 147.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39     avg: 79.3     median: 78.1 (14%)     max: 145.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.4 Watt (2%)
84%
1 R7 260 +
4.1 Watt (3%)
min: 3.78     avg: 9     median: 7.1 (5%)     max: 16.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.2 Watt (6%)
119%
1 R7 260 +
4.4 Watt (5%)
min: 5.42     avg: 8.9     median: 7.8 (9%)     max: 16.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 20     avg: 35.5     median: 33.7 (25%)     max: 66.2 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS → 100% n=39

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 260 → 118% n=39

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS → 123% n=39

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 27. 15:29:37

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16411 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19156 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 16399 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Apr 2025 05:16:04 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16411 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#9 got single benchmarks 16411 +0s ... 0.006s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 19156 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#11 got single benchmarks 19156 +0s ... 0.008s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16399 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#13 got single benchmarks 16399 +0.025s ... 0.037s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.091s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.091s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)