Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS vs AMD Ryzen 7 260 vs AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS

► remove from comparison AMD R5 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 8640HS is a mid-range, Hawk Point family processor that was unveiled in Q4 2023. The 8640HS isn't actually a new chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 5 7640U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8640HS has 6 SMT-enabled cores (12 threads) running at 3.5 GHz to 4.9 GHz. Those Zen 4 architecture cores are mated to the Radeon 760M integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to deliver a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8640HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and USB 4 support (therefore, Thunderbolt is supported as well). The chip is compatible with DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM which is still impressive as of late 2023.

A system powered by this Ryzen 5 will have access to twenty PCIe 4 lanes; this means a speedy enough NVMe SSD will be able to deliver speeds up to 7.8 GB/s.

Systems powered by this APU are expected to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Like most laptop chips, the 8640HS is neither overclockable nor user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

It's safe to expect the APU to be at least 15% faster than the Zen 3 Plus-powered Ryzen 5 6600U (6 cores, 12 threads, up to 4.5 GHz), as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 760M has 8 CUs (512 shaders) running at up to 2,600 MHz. While not great for gaming (unless you are fine with resolutions such as 900p and low detail settings), the iGPU will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It also HW-decodes and HW-encodes the most widely used video codecs including AV1, HEVC, AVC without breaking a sweat.

Power consumption

The 8640HS has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to change to anything between 20 W and 30 W. Most companies will probably go for a higher value to get better performance. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by the chip.

Last but not the least, the 8640HS is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 260

► remove from comparison AMD R7 260

The Ryzen 7 260 is a fast Hawk Point family chip for laptops that was announced at CES 2025. It features 8 Zen 4 cores (16 threads thanks to SMT support) running at up to 5.1 GHz. The chip is identical to the old Ryzen 7 8845HS and therefore also the Ryzen 7 7840HS (which did have a lower clocked NPU).

Architecture and Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips were. The 16 TOPS NPU present here isn't powerful enough for systems built around the 260 to be Copilot+ certified.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen 7 has 16 MB of L3 cache and a seriously fast RAM controller (up to LPDDR5x-7500 and up to DDR5-5600). PCI-Express speeds are capped at 1.97 GB/s per lane which corresponds to the 4.0 spec.

Please note that the APU isn't overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered to the motherboard for good instead (FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since the R7 260 is an 8845HS / 7840HS in disguise, it's safe to expect it to be just slightly faster than the Core i9-13900H and also the Ryzen 9 7940HS, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M (12 CUs / 768 shaders, up to 2,700 MHz) is capable of powering 4 monitors simultaneously with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p. It will also have little issue hardware-encoding and hardware-decoding the most widely used video codecs (such as AV1, HEVC, AVC). As far as gaming is concerned, the thing will let you play most games at 1080p as long as you are fine with low of very low settings.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the APU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 35 W to 54 W, giving system makers a choice between improving battery life and making the system they're designing as powerful as possible. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for a laptop or a mini-PC built around this Ryzen.

The R7 260 is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS

► remove from comparison AMD R7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is a powerful processor (APU) of the Hawk Point family. This isn't an entirely new laptop chip; instead, it's a rebadged Ryzen 7 7840U with a slightly higher wattage as well as higher clock speeds on the Ryzen AI NPU. The 8840HS has eight Zen 4 cores running at 3.3 GHz to 5.1 GHz that are SMT-enabled for a total of 16 processing threads, while the great Radeon 780M is responsible for 3D processing and similar duties.

Architecture & Features

Hawk Point family chips are powered by the Zen 4 architecture, much like Phoenix and Dragon Range family chips are. That's not to say there is no difference between the three. With Hawk Point, AMD is betting big on generative AI; these processors are set to deliver an up to 40% increase in generative AI performance over 7040 series APUs, making apps like DaVinci Resolve and Adobe Photoshop more useful than ever before.

Unlike Zen 3, Zen 4 features AVX512 support and, thanks to a plethora of other improvements including larger caches/registers/buffers, is slated to bring a double-digit IPC improvement over the former.

Elsewhere, the 8840HS has 16 MB of L3 cache and support for super-fast DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM. The chip is compatible with USB 4 and therefore with Thunderbolt. It comes with 20 PCIe 4 lanes, giving NVMe SSDs up to 7.8 GB/s of throughput.

Systems built around this Ryzen 7 series APU are designed to run 64-bit Windows 11, 64-bit Windows 10, or Linux. Please note that this processor is not overclockable and neither is it user-replaceable. It gets soldered down for good instead (FP7, FP7r2, FP8 socket interfaces).

Performance

Since this is a 7840U in disguise that we are dealing with here, it is safe to expect the 8840HS to be about as fast as the Core i7-12650H, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your laptop is.

Graphics

The Radeon 780M has 12 CUs (768 shaders) purring away at up to 2,700 MHz. This is exactly the right iGPU for people looking for a bit more horsepower than what Intel's aging Xe options can provide. The Radeon will let you use up to 4 monitors with resolutions as high as SUHD 4320p and it will also HW-decode and HW-encode the most widely used video codecs (including AV1, HEVC and AVC) without breaking a sweat. In terms of gaming, the thing is good enough for 1080p and medium-to-low settings, as of late 2023.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, how competent the cooling solution of your system is, how fast the RAM of your system is (there is no dedicated VRAM here).

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 series chip has a long-term power limit (default TDP) of 28 W that laptop makers are free to tune to their liking, with values between 20 W and 30 W greenlighted by AMD. Either way, an active cooling solution is a must for any system powered by this chip.

The 8840HS is built with TSMC's 4 nm process for high, as of late 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 8640HSAMD Ryzen 7 260AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
CodenameHawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
SeriesAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Series: Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS « 3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 260 « 3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 2704 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945H4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS4 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2603.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS3.8 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS « 3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2404.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS4.3 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS3.5 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock3500 - 4900 MHz3800 - 5100 MHz3300 - 5100 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache6 MB8 MB8 MB
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB16 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 12
6 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
8 / 16
8 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 4
TDP28 Watt45 Watt28 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
Die Size178 mm2178 mm2178 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketFP7/FP7r2/FP8FP8FP7/FP7r2/FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
iGPUAMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 8640HS
37.8 pt (63%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 260
40.1 pt (67%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 8840HS
38.6 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
97 Points (54%)
104 Points (58%)
min: 99     avg: 100.7     median: 99.6 (56%)     max: 103.6 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
634 Points (12%)
786 Points (15%)
min: 675     avg: 714     median: 677 (13%)     max: 790 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11486 Points (11%)
15864 Points (15%)
min: 12359     avg: 13222     median: 13082 (12%)     max: 14060 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1711 Points (73%)
1760 Points (75%)
min: 1719     avg: 1736     median: 1737 (74%)     max: 1746 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
664 Points (74%)
690 Points (76%)
min: 649     avg: 669     median: 671 (74%)     max: 681 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4475 Points (11%)
6161 Points (15%)
min: 4788     avg: 5121     median: 4994 (12%)     max: 5556 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1845 Points (12%)
2564 Points (16%)
min: 1934     avg: 2070     median: 2045 (13%)     max: 2244 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
268 Points (75%)
278 Points (78%)
min: 261     avg: 267.8     median: 270 (76%)     max: 270 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
21.6 Points (28%)
140%
1 R7 260 +
30.1 Points (39%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.2 Points (76%)
103%
1 R7 260 +
3.3 Points (78%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
7163 Points (43%)
103%
1 R7 260 +
7384 Points (45%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
38415 Points (28%)
119%
1 R7 260 +
45689 Points (33%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
6125 Points (10%)
116%
1 R7 260 +
7121 Points (11%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
49939 MIPS (29%)
63076 MIPS (36%)
min: 49930     avg: 57219     median: 59682 (34%)     max: 61047 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
5975 MIPS (70%)
6439 MIPS (76%)
min: 5702     avg: 6151     median: 6205 (73%)     max: 6493 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
108.8 fps (36%)
133%
1 R7 260 +
144.6 fps (48%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
260.1 fps (60%)
103%
1 R7 260 +
269.1 fps (62%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
14.5 fps (25%)
17.6 fps (31%)
min: 13.1     avg: 15.6     median: 15.7 (28%)     max: 17.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1 GB/s (29%)
130%
1 R7 260 +
1.3 GB/s (38%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.6 GB/s (28%)
131%
1 R7 260 +
2.1 GB/s (36%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.8 GB/s (28%)
106%
1 R7 260 +
11.4 GB/s (30%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
452 Seconds (6%)
322 Seconds (4%)
min: 369     avg: 407.8     median: 404 (5%)     max: 486 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
276 Seconds (2%)
204 Seconds (1%)
min: 226     avg: 246     median: 232 (2%)     max: 297 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.5 sec (11%)
0.4 sec (10%)
min: 0.439     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4774 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12782 Points (27%)
117%
1 R7 260 +
14995 Points (32%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.2 s (2%)
103%
1 R7 260 +
7 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18.4 s (1%)
105%
1 R7 260 +
17.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
683 s (3%)
129%
1 R7 260 +
529 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
15544 Points (39%)
17725 Points (44%)
min: 17441     avg: 17857     median: 17623 (44%)     max: 18690 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
75919 Points (62%)
111%
1 R7 260 +
84022 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
13365 Points (34%)
19375 Points (49%)
min: 16214     avg: 16905     median: 16660 (42%)     max: 17842 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
21026 Points (37%)
25641 Points (46%)
min: 18812     avg: 21790     median: 22488 (40%)     max: 23382 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
7059 Points (30%)
9216 Points (39%)
min: 7391     avg: 8296     median: 8297 (35%)     max: 9011 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2413     avg: 2455     median: 2455 (61%)     max: 2497 Points
2622 Points (65%)
min: 2477     avg: 2550     median: 2552 (64%)     max: 2602 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9120     avg: 9729     median: 9729 (38%)     max: 10338 Points
10180 Points (40%)
min: 9922     avg: 11062     median: 11279 (44%)     max: 11700 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1877 Points (73%)
1948 Points (76%)
min: 1822     avg: 1906     median: 1928 (75%)     max: 1946 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
9060 Points (16%)
9848 Points (18%)
min: 9229     avg: 9948     median: 9897 (18%)     max: 10884 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1796     avg: 1825     median: 1817 (8%)     max: 1863 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9436     avg: 10052     median: 9866 (31%)     max: 10854 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
7558 Points (98%)
102%
1 R7 260 +
7721 Points (100%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
37474 Points (80%)
110%
1 R7 260 +
41046 Points (88%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
551 ms (1%)
min: 518     avg: 537     median: 538 (1%)     max: 563 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 89899     avg: 93041     median: 93040.5 (71%)     max: 96182 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
248 Points (68%)
261 Points (72%)
min: 246     avg: 249.6     median: 248 (68%)     max: 257 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
292 Points (52%)
276 Points (50%)
min: 297     avg: 328.2     median: 299 (54%)     max: 440 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1643     avg: 1670     median: 1672 (63%)     max: 1698 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
51.4 Watt (9%)
75%
1 R7 260 +
68.3 Watt (12%)
min: 37.9     avg: 44.7     median: 46.6 (8%)     max: 53 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 22.3     avg: 41.3     median: 42.6 (8%)     max: 53.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
3.4 Watt (2%)
84%
1 R7 260 +
4.1 Watt (3%)
min: 4.62     avg: 5.4     median: 5.3 (4%)     max: 6.09 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
5.2 Watt (6%)
119%
1 R7 260 +
4.4 Watt (5%)
min: 5.36     avg: 6     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 7.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 42.3     avg: 46     median: 45.9 (34%)     max: 49.8 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS → 100% n=24

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 260 → 118% n=24

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS → 109% n=24

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 27. 15:27:10

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16411 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19156 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 16413 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Apr 2025 05:16:04 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 16411 +0.003s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 16411 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 19156 +0.003s ... 0.02s

#11 got single benchmarks 19156 +0.004s ... 0.023s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 16413 +0.003s ... 0.026s

#13 got single benchmarks 16413 +0.008s ... 0.034s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.081s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.081s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)