Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

► remove from comparison

For CAD and professional applications certified GPU based on the 8400M GS. The higher power consumption of 17 Watt versus 11 Watt of the 8400M GS indicates a higher performance.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M

► remove from comparison

Performance workstation grafic chip with DirectX 10 support and OpenGL 2.1 support. Probaby, it bases upon the NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT.

It is intended for digital content creators, engineers, geologic scientists and other professional 3D applications.

The drivers of the Quadro FX series are certified for CAD applications (e.g. AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ...) and DCC applications (e.g. Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...) and offer a 12-bit precision for subpixel, full image-antialiasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for dots and lines and additional drivers are for CAD and DCC optimized settings.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360MNVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB8M-GLMG64GLM
Pipelines16 - unified32 - unified
Core Speed400 MHz475 MHz
Shader Speed800 MHz950 MHz
Memory Speed600 MHz700 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB256 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption17 Watt35 Watt
Transistors210 Million289 Million
technology80 nm80 nm
FeaturesPowerMizer 7.0, HDR, designed for Vista, 128 Bit HDR, OpenGl 2.1
Date of Announcement09.05.2007 01.06.2007
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.dewww.nvidia.de
ArchitectureG8x
Notebook Sizemedium sized
InformationPowermizer 7.0, CG Shading language, 32 bit floating point precision, 12 bit subpixel precision, 128 bit graphic pipeline, vertex and pixelshader programmability, PureVideo HD, PCI-E interface, FSAA with turned grid, nView multidisplay support, high-precision dynamic-range (HPDR) technology, hardware 3D clipping, full image antialiasing

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 13650     avg: 15054     median: 15053.5 (16%)     max: 16457 Points
min: 24479     avg: 26908     median: 26907.5 (28%)     max: 29336 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 5580     avg: 6010     median: 6010 (3%)     max: 6440 Points
min: 11586     avg: 11958     median: 11957.5 (6%)     max: 12329 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 3365     avg: 3372     median: 3372 (4%)     max: 3379 Points
min: 7674     avg: 7790     median: 7700 (8%)     max: 7997 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
3DMark 06
1490 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
3800 Points (5%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
3DMark 06
1572 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
3904 Points (5%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
3DMark 06
3883 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
2985 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
4534 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
9.3 fps (3%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M → 210% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
10.1  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
7.4  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
328  fps
133%
Quadro FX 570M:
436  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
62  fps
206%
Quadro FX 570M:
128  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
17  fps
200%
Quadro FX 570M:
19 22 24 29 43 43 45 49 ~ 34 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
Quadro FX 570M:
118  fps
med. 640x480
Quadro FX 570M:
116.7  fps
high 800x600
Quadro FX 570M:
111.3  fps
ultra 1024x768
Quadro FX 570M:
89.7  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
242.7  fps
206%
Quadro FX 570M:
501  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M → 186%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 200%

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360MNVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark10.07
Crysis - CPU Benchmark7.39
F.E.A.R.328621743612834
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo242.7501
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360MNVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1		2

1
1


1








< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1


1
1

1








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 27. 00:09:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 513 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 182 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Apr 2025 05:16:28 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.001s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 513 +0s ... 0.001s

#9 got single benchmarks 513 +0s ... 0.002s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 182 +0s ... 0.002s

#11 got single benchmarks 182 +0s ... 0.002s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.002s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.005s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.005s

#15 Got 21 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.006s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.006s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.006s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.008s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.008s

#20 return log +0s ... 0.008s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)