Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

► remove from comparison

For CAD and professional applications certified GPU based on the 8400M GS. The higher power consumption of 17 Watt versus 11 Watt of the 8400M GS indicates a higher performance.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M

This is a professional video card for notebooks from NVidia It is based on 7900GTX.

The application performance is very good due to special professional drivers (3D rendering, CAD), but the gaming performance is weaker. With modded drivers, it should work like a 7900 GTX.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360MNVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB8M-GLMG71glm
Pipelines16 - unified24 / 8 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed400 MHz500 MHz
Shader Speed800 MHz
Memory Speed600 MHz600 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB512 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
Power Consumption17 Watt45 Watt
Transistors210 Million278 Million
technology80 nm90 nm
FeaturesPowerMizer 7.0, HDR, designed for Vista, 128 Bit HDR, OpenGl 2.190nm
Date of Announcement09.05.2007 29.09.2005
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.dewww.nvidia.de
ArchitectureG7x
Notebook Sizelarge

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 13650     avg: 15054     median: 15053.5 (16%)     max: 16457 Points
27600 Points (29%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 5580     avg: 6010     median: 6010 (3%)     max: 6440 Points
min: 18100     avg: 18342     median: 18341.5 (10%)     max: 18583 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 3365     avg: 3372     median: 3372 (4%)     max: 3379 Points
min: 8400     avg: 8450     median: 8450 (9%)     max: 8500 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
3DMark 06
1490 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
3DMark 06
1572 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
3DMark 06
min: 4690     avg: 4695     median: 4695 (6%)     max: 4700 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
2985 Points (2%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M → 246% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
10.1  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
7.4  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
328  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
62  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
17  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
242.7  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360MNVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark10.07
Crysis - CPU Benchmark7.39
F.E.A.R.3286217
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo242.7
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360MNVIDIA Quadro FX 2500M
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1		2

1
1


1








< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

















For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 27. 00:03:49

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 513 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Apr 2025 05:16:28 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.002s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 513 +0.01s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 513 +0.004s ... 0.016s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 5 +0s ... 0.016s

#11 got single benchmarks 5 +0s ... 0.016s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.019s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.019s

#15 Got 6 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.02s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.02s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.02s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.022s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.022s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.024s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)