Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

The Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M is a professional graphics card for laptops. It features certified drivers that are optimized for CAD (e.g., AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ..), DCC (e.g., Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...), and visualization applications. The FX 2700M is based on the G94 core and therefore similar to the GeForce 9700M GTS.

The Quadro FX series of cards are optimized for professional applications like CAD or DCC. Especially the OpenGL performance should be noticeable better than with consumer GeForce cards. The certified drivers, that come with the Quadro cards guarantee a frictionless work with applications like AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3d and others. Furthermore they offer 12-Bit precision for subpixels, fullscreen anti-aliasing, hardware accelerated antialiasing for points and lines and other CAD and DCC optimizations.

 

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

The Quadro FX 770M is a professional midrange graphics adapter for laptops / mobile workstations. The GPU is optimized for professional 2D and 3D applications like CAD, DCC, and visualization software. The FX770M solutions contains certified graphics drivers for the most popular applications.

The GPU chip of the Quadro FX770M is based on the GeForce 9600M GT consumer card for notebooks. Therefore, the Quadro has the same features (like the PureVideo HD video-processor) as the 9600M GT.

The performance of the card should be compareable to the 9600M GT. Still some games may run slower, as the drivers are optimized for applications and OpenGL. Especially the OpenGL performance is way better than with an 9600M GT. The Cinebench R10 OpenGL test shows up to twize the performance with a FX 770M compared to a GeForce 9600M GT.

As all cards of the GeForce 9000M series, the 770M support CUDA.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700MNVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB9E-GLM2NB9P-GLM
ArchitectureG9xG9x
Pipelines48 - unified32 - unified
Core Speed530 MHz500 MHz
Shader Speed1325 MHz1250 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR3GDDR2 / GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB512 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Power Consumption65 Watt35 Watt
Transistors504 Million314 Million
technology65 nm65 nm
FeaturesOpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, PureVideo HD OpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, 12-Bit subpixel precision, 128 Bit graphics pipeline precision
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement14.08.2008 14.08.2008
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
2799 Points (1%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
2392 Points (1%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
36280 Points (38%)
34871 Points (36%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 23330     avg: 23842     median: 23841.5 (12%)     max: 24353 Points
17192 Points (9%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 13450     avg: 14224     median: 14224 (16%)     max: 14998 Points
11161 Points (12%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark 06
7580 Points (10%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
3DMark 06
7660 Points (10%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
min: 5230     avg: 5297     median: 5296.5 (7%)     max: 5363 Points
SPECviewperf 10 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
33.1 Points (69%)
SPECviewperf 10 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
40.1 Points (84%)
SPECviewperf 10 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
31.7 Points (67%)
SPECviewperf 10 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
85.1 Points (46%)
SPECviewperf 10 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
36.1 Points (71%)
SPECviewperf 10 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
55 Points (81%)
SPECviewperf 10 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
19 Points (49%)
SPECviewperf 10 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
17.5 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
4394 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
6180 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M → 91% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
94.2  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
39  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
19.5  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
84.7  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
35.4  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
18.1  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
Quadro FX 770M:
165.2  fps
med. 640x480
Quadro FX 770M:
171.3  fps
high 800x600
Quadro FX 770M:
158.7  fps
ultra 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
126.1  fps
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700MNVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark94.23919.5
Crysis - CPU Benchmark84.735.418.1
Doom 3165.2171.3158.7126.1
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700MNVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2
1
2

1		2


1


1





For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 27. 00:11:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 883 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 884 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Apr 2025 05:16:28 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.002s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 883 +0.008s ... 0.011s

#9 got single benchmarks 883 +0s ... 0.011s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 884 +0s ... 0.011s

#11 got single benchmarks 884 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.012s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.016s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.016s

#15 Got 10 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.018s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.018s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.018s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.019s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.019s

#20 return log +0s ... 0.019s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)