Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N150 vs Intel Core 3 N350

Intel Processor N150

► remove from comparison Intel Processor N150

The Intel Processor N150 is the slowest mobile processor of the Twin Lake family. Twin Lake is mostly identical to Alder Lake-N, an architecture that will turn 4 in H2 2025. The N150 is meant for entry-level laptops, tablets and mini PCs with no fans; it offers 4 Efficient (Gracemont) cores that run at up to 3.6 GHz, but no Performance cores. Compared to the N250, the N150 has a significantly slower iGPU and slightly lower CPU clock speeds.

Gracemont E-cores do not support Hyper-Threading. No extra threads here.

Performance

Its multi-thread performance should be about as good as older dual-core CPUs like the Core i3-10110U. Exact figures depend on the cooling solution and TDP settings of the system. Either way, this is a pretty slow chip that is only just fast enough for basic tasks.

Graphics

The SoC comes equipped with a Xe-architecture graphics unit with 24 EUs (Execution Units) running at up to 1.0 GHz. The iGPU can drive up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors and hardware-decodes AV1 among other popular video codecs. Due to the low number of Xe cores and the single-channel RAM restriction, gaming performance is only good enough for very old games and low resolutions such as XGA 1024 x 768.

Architecture and Features

The integrated memory controller supports single-channel DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 and LPDDR5-4800 RAM. PCIe NVMe SSD speeds are capped at 3.9 GB/s, corresponding to the PCIe 3 spec. There is no Thunderbolt / USB 4 support here, however, the latest Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 7 wireless networking modules are supported.

Its L3 cache is relatively small at 6 MB, and it has no proper NPU (and thus no Copilot+ branding).

Power consumption

The N150 is supposed to consume 6 watts when under longer loads. This is the Intel-recommended PL1 for the chip. No data on PL2 has been provided but values higher than 15 W are unlikely.

The SoC is manufactured using the second-generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 meaning power efficiency isn't great here compared to the latest 3 nm silicon from the likes of Apple.

Intel Core 3 N350

► remove from comparison Intel Core 3 N350

The Intel Core 3 N350 (sometimes referred to as the Intel Processor N350) is a mobile processor of the Twin Lake family which is mostly identical to Alder Lake-N, an architecture that will turn 4 in H2 2025. The chip is meant for entry-level laptops, tablets and mini PCs with no fans; it offers 8 Efficient (Gracemont) cores that run at up to 3.9 GHz, but no Performance cores. Compared to the N355, the N350 has a lower Intel-recommended TDP power target, likely resulting in a significant (up to 30%) performance loss, but is identical in all other respects.

The E-cores do not support Hyper-Threading. No extra threads here.

Performance

Its multi-thread performance should be a few percentage points lower than older quad-core CPUs like the Ryzen 3 5300U and Core i7-1165G7. Exact figures depend on the cooling solution and TDP settings of the system. Either way, the 8 cores are capable enough to run most day-to-day tasks in 2025.

Graphics

The SoC comes equipped with a Xe-architecture graphics unit with 32 EUs (Execution Units) running at up to 1.35 GHz. The iGPU can drive up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors and hardware-decodes AV1 among other popular video codecs. Due to the low number of Xe cores and the single-channel RAM restriction, gaming performance is only good enough for older games and fairly low resolutions. GTA V should be playable at 768p on Medium.

Architecture and Features

The integrated memory controller supports single-channel DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800 and LPDDR5-4800 RAM. PCIe NVMe SSD speeds are capped at 3.9 GB/s, corresponding to the PCIe 3 spec. There is no Thunderbolt / USB 4 support here, however, the latest Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 7 wireless networking modules are supported.

Its L3 cache is relatively small at 6 MB, and it has no proper NPU (and thus no Copilot+ branding).

Power consumption

The Intel Core 3 N350 is supposed to consume 7 watts when under longer loads. This is the Intel-recommended PL1 for the chip. No data on PL2 has been provided but values higher than 18 W are unlikely.

The SoC is manufactured using the second-generation 10 nm process marketed as Intel 7 meaning power efficiency isn't great here compared to the latest 3 nm silicon from the likes of Apple.

ModelIntel Processor N150Intel Core 3 N350
CodenameTwin LakeTwin Lake
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Twin Lake
Intel Core 3 N355 compare3 - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 3 N350 - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N250 compare - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N150 « - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 3 N355 compare3 - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core 3 N350 « - 3.9 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N250 compare - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N150 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock <=3600 MHz <=3900 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
8 / 8
8 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
TDP6 Watt7 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
SocketBGA1264BGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHADDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1000 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) ( - 1350 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.intel.com
L1 Cache768 KB
L2 Cache4 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Processor N150
25 pt (42%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 53     avg: 58.2     median: 60.4 (34%)     max: 61.3 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 130     avg: 154.8     median: 155.5 (3%)     max: 178.9 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 2016     avg: 2399     median: 2428 (2%)     max: 2753 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 828     avg: 907     median: 943 (40%)     max: 949 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 313     avg: 344.7     median: 359 (40%)     max: 362 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 768     avg: 917     median: 933 (2%)     max: 1051 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 313     avg: 390     median: 402 (3%)     max: 455 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 134     avg: 148.2     median: 154.3 (43%)     max: 156.4 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
4.3 Points (6%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.7 Points (40%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4743 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
11375 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
17063 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
7251 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1022 s (12%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
30.7 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1901 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 9639     avg: 11044     median: 11171 (6%)     max: 12321 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3590     avg: 3785     median: 3859 (45%)     max: 3906 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
24.4 fps (8%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
119.8 fps (28%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 2.43     avg: 2.8     median: 2.8 (5%)     max: 3.21 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 2125     avg: 2420     median: 2429 (31%)     max: 2707 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 1094     avg: 1234     median: 1233 (9%)     max: 1374 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.846     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 0.957 sec
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
19.3 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
40.8 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4416     avg: 5083     median: 5024 (13%)     max: 5810 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
37351 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
36745 Points (30%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
43172 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3612     avg: 3888     median: 3956 (10%)     max: 4097 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5201     avg: 5660     median: 5776 (10%)     max: 6003 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1704     avg: 1886     median: 1887 (8%)     max: 2068 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 1129     avg: 1211     median: 1249 (31%)     max: 1255 Points
1349 Points (34%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 2369     avg: 2814     median: 2980 (12%)     max: 3093 Points
4749 Points (18%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 924     avg: 978     median: 991 (39%)     max: 1020 Points
1071 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2072     avg: 2439     median: 2579 (5%)     max: 2667 Points
2814 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
907 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2079 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
4527 Points (45%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
8942 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1044     avg: 1092     median: 1047 (1%)     max: 1186 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 118.3     avg: 126.8     median: 126.8 (35%)     max: 135.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 145.3     avg: 164     median: 172.3 (31%)     max: 174.3 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 710     avg: 727     median: 715 (27%)     max: 756 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 21.6     avg: 23.4     median: 23.4 (4%)     max: 25.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 20.1     avg: 22.5     median: 23.4 (4%)     max: 24.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.51     avg: 10.2     median: 8.9 (6%)     max: 14.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 13     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (12%)     max: 20 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N150 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 3 N350 → 121% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 04. 15:01:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18713 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18714 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 04 May 2025 05:16:18 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18713 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 18713 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18714 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 18714 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.027s ... 0.044s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.047s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)