Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Processor N100 vs Intel Processor N200 vs Intel Core i3-N300

Intel Processor N100

► remove from comparison Intel N100

The Intel Processor N100 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with 1 to 3.4 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache.

Performance

The average N100 in our database delivers unimpressive multi-thread benchmark scores that are most similar to those of the Core i3-1115G4. The chip is fast enough for many day-to-day tasks, but not much more than that; the other thing to keep in mind is that of the two N100-toting systems tested by us as of October 2023, both have rather high CPU power limits. The chip will be noticeably slower if limited to just six or seven Watts.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offers only 24 of the 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds, and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N100 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Processor N200

► remove from comparison Intel N200

The Intel Processor N200 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 4 of the 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.7 GHz. The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance is clearly lower than the Core i3-N300 and N305 due to the reduced core count. Compared to older processors, the N200 should be similar to a Core i5-8250U (4 cores with HyperThreading, 3.4 GHz, 15W) when the power limit is not restricting performance.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at only 450 - 750 MHz. Due to the single channel memory, low clock speeds and low shader count, the gaming performance of the iGPU is very limited.

Power consumption

The N200 has a base power consumption of only 6 W and is therefore suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

Intel Core i3-N300

► remove from comparison Intel i3-N300

The Intel Core i3-N305 is an entry-level mobile CPU for thin and light laptops from the Alder Lake-N series. It was announced in early 2023 and offers no performance cores and 8 efficient cores (E-cores, Gracemont architecture). The chip does not support HyperThreading and clocks with up to 3.8 GHz (single core, 3 GHz all core Turbo). The performance of the E-cores should be similar to old Skylake cores (compare to the Core i7-6700HQ). All cores can use up to 6 MB L3-cache. 

Performance

The performance depends on the cooling and TDP settings and should be somewhere similar to the old  Alder Lake Pentium 8500 (1 performance core, 4 efficiency cores, max. 4.4 GHz and 8 MB L3-cache). The multi-threaded performance should be quite good with the 8 cores but will suffer due to the low TDP. Single thread performance will suffer due to the missing P-cores and relatively low boost clock speeds.

Features

The Alder Lake-N chips only support single channel memory with up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 or LPDDR5-4800. The chip also supports Quick Sync and AV1 decoding (most likely same engine as in Alder Lake). Furthermore, Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2 are partly integrated (but no Thunderbolt). External chips can be connected via PCIe Gen3 x9 (via the PCH).

The integrated graphics adapter is based on the Xe-architecture and offersall 32 EUs (Execution Units) operating at up to 1.25 GHz. In addition to the single channel memory, the gaming performance is very limited of the iGPU.

Power consumption

The i3 has a base power consumption of 7 W and is therefore even suited for fanless cooling. The CPU is built with a further improved 10nm SuperFin process at Intel (called Intel 7).

ModelIntel Processor N100Intel Processor N200Intel Core i3-N300
CodenameAlder Lake-NAlder Lake-NAlder Lake-N
SeriesIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-NIntel Alder Lake-N
Series: Alder Lake-N Alder Lake-N
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N100 « 1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N200 « 1 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N3051.8 - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i3-N300 « - 3.8 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N2001 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N97 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N95 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N1001 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Processor N501 - 3.4 GHz2 / 2 cores6 MB L3
Clock1000 - 3400 MHz1000 - 3700 MHz <=3800 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 4
4 x 3.4 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
4 / 4
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
8 / 8
8 x 3.8 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
TDP6 Watt6 Watt7 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1264
FeaturesDDR4-3200/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-4800 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) ( - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$128 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N100
24.4 pt (41%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - N200
20.8 pt (35%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i3-N300
19 pt (32%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
100%
N100 +
min: 60     avg: 60.5     median: 60.5 (34%)     max: 61 Points
45 Points (25%)
34 Points (19%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
100%
N100 +
min: 194     avg: 195     median: 195 (4%)     max: 196 Points
91 Points (2%)
165 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
N100 +
min: 1577     avg: 2449     median: 2559.5 (2%)     max: 2983 Points
1406 Points (1%)
2546 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
N100 +
min: 747     avg: 885     median: 910.5 (38%)     max: 942 Points
690 Points (29%)
513 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
N100 +
min: 285     avg: 338     median: 347 (38%)     max: 358 Points
265 Points (29%)
195 Points (21%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
N100 +
min: 590     avg: 934     median: 978.5 (2%)     max: 1139 Points
542 Points (1%)
968 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 246     avg: 384.6     median: 401.5 (3%)     max: 479 Points
219 Points (1%)
416 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 118.8     avg: 143.8     median: 147.9 (41%)     max: 155 Points
113 Points (31%)
85 Points (24%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 3.84     avg: 4.6     median: 4.2 (5%)     max: 5.99 Points
2.7 Points (4%)
5.3 Points (7%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
N100 +
min: 1.55     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (42%)     max: 1.87 Points
1.4 Points (32%)
1 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
N100 +
min: 4604     avg: 4896     median: 4869 (29%)     max: 5179 Points
3937 Points (24%)
2884 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
N100 +
min: 9608     avg: 12281     median: 11207 (8%)     max: 15336 Points
7549 Points (5%)
12014 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
N100 +
min: 14514     avg: 18829     median: 16948 (11%)     max: 24225 Points
11030 Points (7%)
18450 Points (12%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
N100 +
min: 7171     avg: 7699     median: 7750 (9%)     max: 8227 Points
5971 Points (7%)
4497 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
N100 +
min: 481.652     avg: 569     median: 588.3 (7%)     max: 645.884 s
875 s (10%)
531 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
N100 +
min: 15.795     avg: 16.5     median: 16.2 (3%)     max: 17.7 s
26 s (5%)
17.5 s (4%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
N100 +
min: 2187     avg: 2343     median: 2372 (4%)     max: 2501 Points
2115 Points (3%)
1915 Points (3%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
N100 +
min: 7532     avg: 11072     median: 11663.5 (7%)     max: 13291 MIPS
7146 MIPS (4%)
11976 MIPS (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
N100 +
min: 3046     avg: 3629     median: 3653.5 (43%)     max: 3958 MIPS
3230 MIPS (38%)
2403 MIPS (28%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
N100 +
min: 20.85     avg: 27.1     median: 24.1 (8%)     max: 34.7 fps
16.3 fps (5%)
28.9 fps (10%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
N100 +
min: 101.8     avg: 134.8     median: 121.2 (28%)     max: 173 fps
80 fps (18%)
106.6 fps (25%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
N100 +
min: 1.72     avg: 2.8     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.49 fps
1.5 fps (3%)
3.2 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
N100 +
min: 0.257     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (8%)     max: 0.263 GB/s
110%
N200 +
0.3 GB/s (8%)
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
N100 +
min: 0.529     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (9%)     max: 0.538 GB/s
110%
N200 +
0.6 GB/s (10%)
0.5 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
N100 +
min: 2.8     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (8%)     max: 2.9 GB/s
110%
N200 +
3.2 GB/s (8%)
2.6 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
N100 +
min: 1992     avg: 2545     median: 2067 (26%)     max: 3964 Seconds
4297 Seconds (55%)
2147 Seconds (27%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
N100 +
min: 1017     avg: 1322     median: 1198.5 (8%)     max: 1956 Seconds
2150 Seconds (15%)
1095 Seconds (8%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
N100 +
min: 0.822     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (19%)     max: 1.06 sec
1.1 sec (25%)
1.3 sec (29%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
N100 +
min: 4091     avg: 5232     median: 4838 (10%)     max: 6441 Points
3902 Points (8%)
4261 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
N100 +
min: 19.264     avg: 19.4     median: 19.4 (4%)     max: 19.531 s
103%
N200 +
18.8 s (4%)
33.2 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
N100 +
min: 40.302     avg: 40.5     median: 40.4 (2%)     max: 40.679 s
42.7 s (2%)
69.1 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
N100 +
min: 816.966     avg: 836     median: 818.8 (4%)     max: 863.891 s
1011 s (4%)
1381 s (6%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
N100 +
min: 9434     avg: 12661     median: 11998 (9%)     max: 15625 Points
9491 Points (7%)
15263 Points (12%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 3723     avg: 5317     median: 5940 (15%)     max: 6486 Points
2765 Points (7%)
4983 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 34828     avg: 42619     median: 41217 (33%)     max: 51063 Points
27649 Points (22%)
28114 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 34083     avg: 42751     median: 41809 (34%)     max: 51420 Points
28655 Points (23%)
28073 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 50867     avg: 52331     median: 52418.5 (43%)     max: 53373 Points
34749 Points (29%)
28903 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 3133     avg: 3959     median: 4061.5 (10%)     max: 4693 Points
2848 Points (7%)
4049 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
N100 +
min: 4589     avg: 5806     median: 6371 (11%)     max: 6602 Points
4135 Points (7%)
5528 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 N100 +
min: 1407     avg: 1999     median: 2054 (9%)     max: 2519 Points
61%
1 N200 +
1251 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 1070     avg: 1195     median: 1221.5 (31%)     max: 1245 Points
956 Points (24%)
762 Points (19%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 2283     avg: 2937     median: 3157 (12%)     max: 3282 Points
1660 Points (6%)
2803 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 571     avg: 1440     median: 1175 (37%)     max: 3105 Points
853 Points (27%)
734 Points (23%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 1356     avg: 6236     median: 3047 (13%)     max: 21003 Points
1375 Points (6%)
2641 Points (11%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 915     avg: 981     median: 986 (39%)     max: 1018 Points
928 Points (36%)
626 Points (24%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 1911     avg: 2598     median: 2829 (5%)     max: 2896 Points
1540 Points (3%)
2674 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 968     avg: 990     median: 993 (4%)     max: 1008 Points
891 Points (4%)
616 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 2278     avg: 2624     median: 2753 (9%)     max: 2862 Points
1518 Points (5%)
2642 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 4278     avg: 4440     median: 4467 (45%)     max: 4549 Points
102%
N200 +
4552 Points (45%)
2913 Points (29%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
N100 +
min: 10361     avg: 11002     median: 11197 (11%)     max: 11264 Points
9989 Points (10%)
9894 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
N100 +
min: 1004     avg: 1049     median: 1024.5 (1%)     max: 1122 ms
1460 ms (2%)
1638 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N100 +
50984 Points (39%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 N100 +
min: 128.3     avg: 133.5     median: 134.3 (37%)     max: 138.3 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
N100 +
min: 156.3     avg: 170.5     median: 170.9 (31%)     max: 187.4 Points
100%
N200 +
171.3 Points (31%)
104.3 Points (19%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
N100 +
min: 706     avg: 779     median: 786 (29%)     max: 839 Points
614 Points (23%)
529 Points (20%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 12.2     avg: 21.2     median: 21.7 (4%)     max: 29.1 Watt
154%
1 N200 +
14.1 Watt (2%)
24.4 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 12.4     avg: 20.9     median: 24 (4%)     max: 26.1 Watt
176%
1 N200 +
13.6 Watt (2%)
108%
1 i3-N300 +
22.2 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 2.84     avg: 7.3     median: 7.6 (5%)     max: 10.3 Watt
125%
1 N200 +
6.1 Watt (4%)
14.7 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 N100 +
min: 3.92     avg: 5.3     median: 5.3 (6%)     max: 6.77 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
100%
1 N100 +
min: 17.6     avg: 18.4     median: 18.4 (14%)     max: 19.1 Points per Watt
88%
1 N200 +
16.1 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N100 → 100% n=52

Average Benchmarks Intel Processor N200 → 73% n=52

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-N300 → 82% n=52

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 06. 03:56:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14932 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14930 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14928 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 04 Jun 2025 05:19:28 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14932 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 14932 +0.01s ... 0.018s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14930 +0.004s ... 0.021s

#11 got single benchmarks 14930 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14928 +0.001s ... 0.027s

#13 got single benchmarks 14928 +0s ... 0.028s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.062s ... 0.09s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)