Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-T760 MP4 vs ARM Mali-T720

ARM Mali-T760 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T760 MP4

The ARM Mali-T760 MP4 (or Mali-T764) is a mobile graphics solution primarily for Android smartphones and tablets. The chip has been available since Q1/2015 and can be found on the Rockchip RK3288 SoC. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports both OpenCL 1.1 and DirectX 11. According to ARM, the Mali-T760 can be scaled from 1 to 16 cores/clusters.

The MP4 version offers 4 clusters clocked at up to 600 MHz. GPU performance is middle-of-the-road as of 2014 and most Android games as of today should run fluently.

ARM Mali-T720

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T720

The ARM Mali-T720 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs. The chip is available since 2014. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11 FL9_3. According to ARM, the Mali-T720 can be scaled from 1 - 8 cores/clusters (MP1, MP2, ... MP) and clocks up to 650 MHz.

Sometimes the SoC does not specifies the number of cores, therefore this generic page / GPU for the single cluster variant is used and the benchmarks may differ. See e.g. the Mali-T720 MP2 and T720 MP4 pages for comparison.

The MP1 variant is only as fast as the older Mali-400 MP4 graphics card and therefore only suited for low demanding 3D games (Android based). However, the power consumption on the other hand is rather low and therefore the GPU is also suited for small smartphones.

show full text
ARM Mali-T760 MP4ARM Mali-T720
Mali-T700 Series
Mali-T760 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.7 - 0.77 GHz
Mali-T760 MP6 compare 6 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T760 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T720 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T720 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T720 1 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.7 - 0.77 GHz
Mali-T760 MP6 compare 6 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T760 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T720 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T720 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T720 1 @ 0.6 GHz
CodenameMidgard (3rd Generation)Midgard (3rd Generation)
ArchitectureMidgard (3rd-gen)Midgard (3rd-gen)
Pipelines4 - unified1 - unified
Core Speed600 MHz600 MHz
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.1DirectX 9.3, OpenGL ES 3.1
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11.1, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAAOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11.1, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAA
Date of Announcement01.10.2013 01.03.2015
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comwww.arm.com
CPU in Mali-T760 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Rockchip RK32884 x 1800 MHz600 MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-T720GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek MT67354 x 1500 MHz? MHz600 MHz
Mediatek MT87354 x 1300 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek MT6735P4 x 1000 MHz? MHz600 MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? MHz? - 600 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
9208 Points (1%)
min: 2171     avg: 3387     median: 2974 (0%)     max: 6469 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 1375     avg: 1636     median: 1653 (0%)     max: 2008 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 2265     avg: 3255     median: 3387 (0%)     max: 4050 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 148     avg: 189.6     median: 169.5 (1%)     max: 284 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 120     avg: 157.1     median: 143 (0%)     max: 237 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 91     avg: 135.8     median: 116 (0%)     max: 287 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 73     avg: 91.7     median: 87 (0%)     max: 120 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
610 Points (5%)
min: 68     avg: 179.5     median: 161 (1%)     max: 293 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
540 Points (3%)
min: 54     avg: 147.3     median: 131.5 (1%)     max: 243 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
442 Points (2%)
min: 65     avg: 121     median: 102 (1%)     max: 265 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
377 Points (1%)
min: 52     avg: 97.7     median: 82 (0%)     max: 220 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
1.8 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
4.9 fps (0%)
min: 1     avg: 2.3     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 8.9 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
7.1 fps (0%)
min: 1.3     avg: 2.5     median: 2.2 (0%)     max: 4.4 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP4
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
16 fps (0%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T720
min: 4.1     avg: 6.9     median: 6 (0%)     max: 19 fps
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 20.86     avg: 32.2     median: 27.8 (46%)     max: 52.1 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 1485     avg: 2119     median: 1837 (4%)     max: 4005 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 3159     avg: 4471     median: 3911 (9%)     max: 8103 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 46.6     avg: 48.2     median: 46.9 (70%)     max: 51 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1568     avg: 2323     median: 2320 (1%)     max: 3158 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 457     avg: 652     median: 577.5 (1%)     max: 1115 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 3088     avg: 3261     median: 3183 (69%)     max: 3537 Points

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T760 MP4 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T720 → 28% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Mali-T720:
12  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Mali-T720:
30  fps
ultra
Mali-T720:
28  fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
Mali-T720:
38 □  fps
high
Mali-T720:
35 □  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Mali-T720:
26 29 29 30 30 ~ 29 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Mali-T720:
16 20 22 28 30 ~ 23 fps
high
Mali-T720:
10 11 12 12 13 23 ~ 14 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-T720:
14 18 ~ 16 fps
high
Mali-T720:
10  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
Mali-T720:
15  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Mali-T720:
59  fps
ARM Mali-T760 MP4ARM Mali-T720
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile12
Arena of Valor3028
Battle Bay3835
Dead Trigger 229
Asphalt 8: Airborne2314
Asphalt 9: Legends1610
Real Racing 315
Temple Run 259
ARM Mali-T760 MP4ARM Mali-T720
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		4
2




3
2

1








For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 30. 01:46:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6455 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7332 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:17:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.019s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6455 +0.016s ... 0.035s

#9 got single benchmarks 6455 +0.004s ... 0.039s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7332 +0s ... 0.039s

#11 got single benchmarks 7332 +0.021s ... 0.06s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.06s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.075s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.075s

#15 Got 26 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.08s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.08s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.081s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.085s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.085s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.086s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)