Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-T720 vs ARM Mali-T760 MP6 vs ARM Mali-T720 MP4

ARM Mali-T720

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T720

The ARM Mali-T720 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs. The chip is available since 2014. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11 FL9_3. According to ARM, the Mali-T720 can be scaled from 1 - 8 cores/clusters (MP1, MP2, ... MP) and clocks up to 650 MHz.

Sometimes the SoC does not specifies the number of cores, therefore this generic page / GPU for the single cluster variant is used and the benchmarks may differ. See e.g. the Mali-T720 MP2 and T720 MP4 pages for comparison.

The MP1 variant is only as fast as the older Mali-400 MP4 graphics card and therefore only suited for low demanding 3D games (Android based). However, the power consumption on the other hand is rather low and therefore the GPU is also suited for small smartphones.

ARM Mali-T760 MP6

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T760 MP6

The ARM Mali-T760 MP6 is a mobile graphics solution for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. The chip is available since Q1/2015 and for example integrated in the Exynos 5433 Octa SoC. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 as well as DirectX 11. According to ARM, the Mali-T760 can be scaled from 1 - 16 cores/clusters.

The MP6 version offers 6 clusters clocked at up to 700 MHz (143 GFLOPS). According to first benchmarks, the performance is similar to the Adreno 420 and PowerVR GX6450. Therfore, even very demanding games of 2014 should run in high resolutions fluently.

ARM Mali-T720 MP4

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-T720 MP4

The ARM Mali-T720 MP4 (or T724) is a mobile graphics solution found in many ARM SoCs. The chip has been available since Q1/2015 in the Mediatek MT6753 and other low-end SoCs. Besides OpenGL ES 3.1, the GPU supports OpenCL 1.1 and DirectX 11 FL9_3. 

The T720 MP4 offers 4 shader clusters at up to 600 MHz (40.8 GFLOPS). Therefore, the GPU should perform slightly worse than an Adreno 405 or PowerVR G6200. Modern Android games should therefore run fluently in 720p.

The GPU is typically built for smartphone SoCs in 28nm.

show full text
ARM Mali-T720ARM Mali-T760 MP6ARM Mali-T720 MP4
Mali-T700 Series
Mali-T760 MP8 8 @ 0.7 - 0.77 GHz
Mali-T760 MP6 6 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T760 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T720 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T720 MP2 2 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T720 1 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP8 8 @ 0.7 - 0.77 GHz
Mali-T760 MP6 6 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T760 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T720 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T720 MP2 2 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T720 1 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP8 8 @ 0.7 - 0.77 GHz
Mali-T760 MP6 6 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T760 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T760 MP2 2 @ 0.7 GHz
Mali-T720 MP4 4 @ 0.6 GHz
Mali-T720 MP2 2 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-T720 1 @ 0.6 GHz
CodenameMidgard (3rd Generation)Midgard (3rd Generation)Midgard (3rd Generation)
ArchitectureMidgard (3rd-gen)Midgard (3rd-gen)Midgard (3rd-gen)
Pipelines1 - unified6 - unified4 - unified
Core Speed600 MHz700 MHz600 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynonono
APIDirectX 9.3, OpenGL ES 3.1DirectX 11, OpenGL ES 3.1DirectX 11 (FL 9_3), OpenGL ES 3.1
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11.1, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAAOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11, Renderscript, FSAA/MSAAOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 (FL 9_3)
Date of Announcement01.03.2015 01.10.2013 30.10.2013
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.arm.comwww.arm.comwww.arm.com
technology28 nm
CPU in Mali-T720GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek MT67354 x 1500 MHz? MHz600 MHz
Mediatek MT87354 x 1300 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek MT6735P4 x 1000 MHz? MHz600 MHz
» show 2 more
min. - max.? MHz? - 600 MHz
CPU in Mali-T760 MP6GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 5433 Octa8 x 1900 MHz? MHz700 MHz
CPU in Mali-T720 MP4GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek MT67538 x 1500 MHz? MHz600 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 2171     avg: 3387     median: 2974 (0%)     max: 6469 Points
min: 20006     avg: 20244     median: 20244 (2%)     max: 20482 Points
min: 2581     avg: 5872     median: 6250 (1%)     max: 6705 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 1375     avg: 1636     median: 1653 (0%)     max: 2008 Points
min: 1655     avg: 3350     median: 3893.5 (0%)     max: 3959 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 2265     avg: 3255     median: 3387 (0%)     max: 4050 Points
min: 3359     avg: 6578     median: 7561 (1%)     max: 7832 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 148     avg: 189.6     median: 169.5 (1%)     max: 284 Points
286 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 120     avg: 157.1     median: 143 (0%)     max: 237 Points
238 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 91     avg: 135.8     median: 116 (0%)     max: 287 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 73     avg: 91.7     median: 87 (0%)     max: 120 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 68     avg: 179.5     median: 161 (1%)     max: 293 Points
min: 929     avg: 938     median: 937.5 (8%)     max: 946 Points
min: 122     avg: 270.8     median: 289 (3%)     max: 298 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 54     avg: 147.3     median: 131.5 (1%)     max: 243 Points
min: 830     avg: 837     median: 836.5 (5%)     max: 843 Points
min: 229     avg: 239.8     median: 239.5 (1%)     max: 248 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 65     avg: 121     median: 102 (1%)     max: 265 Points
min: 707     avg: 709     median: 708.5 (3%)     max: 710 Points
min: 79     avg: 177.8     median: 186 (1%)     max: 202 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 52     avg: 97.7     median: 82 (0%)     max: 220 Points
612 Points (2%)
min: 148     avg: 154.1     median: 154 (1%)     max: 164 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
1.8 fps (0%)
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 1     avg: 2.3     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 8.9 fps
min: 0.87     avg: 2.4     median: 2.9 (0%)     max: 3.1 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 1.3     avg: 2.5     median: 2.2 (0%)     max: 4.4 fps
min: 10.4     avg: 13.7     median: 13.7 (1%)     max: 17 fps
min: 1.6     avg: 4     median: 4.2 (0%)     max: 4.8 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T720
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 4.1     avg: 6.9     median: 6 (0%)     max: 19 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T760 MP6
min: 24     avg: 31     median: 31 (0%)     max: 38 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T720 MP4
min: 4.9     avg: 11.2     median: 12 (0%)     max: 13 fps
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 20.86     avg: 32.2     median: 27.8 (46%)     max: 52.1 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 1485     avg: 2119     median: 1837 (4%)     max: 4005 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 3159     avg: 4471     median: 3911 (9%)     max: 8103 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 46.6     avg: 48.2     median: 46.9 (70%)     max: 51 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 1568     avg: 2323     median: 2320 (1%)     max: 3158 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 457     avg: 652     median: 577.5 (1%)     max: 1115 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 3088     avg: 3261     median: 3183 (69%)     max: 3537 Points
4489 Points (98%)
min: 3286     avg: 3756     median: 3755.5 (82%)     max: 4225 Points

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T720 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T760 MP6 → 578% n=8

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T720 MP4 → 181% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-T720:
12  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-T720:
30  fps
ultra
100%
Mali-T720:
28  fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
100%
Mali-T720:
38 □  fps
high
100%
Mali-T720:
35 □  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T720:
26 29 29 30 30 ~ 29 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-T720:
16 20 22 28 30 ~ 23 fps
high
100%
Mali-T720:
10 11 12 12 13 23 ~ 14 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-T720:
14 18 ~ 16 fps
high
100%
Mali-T720:
10  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
100%
Mali-T720:
15  fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T720:
59  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T720 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

ARM Mali-T720ARM Mali-T760 MP6ARM Mali-T720 MP4
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
PUBG Mobile12
Arena of Valor3028
Battle Bay3835
Dead Trigger 229
Asphalt 8: Airborne2314
Asphalt 9: Legends1610
Real Racing 315
Temple Run 259
ARM Mali-T720ARM Mali-T760 MP6ARM Mali-T720 MP4
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		4
2




3
2

1








< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

















For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 30. 05:16:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7332 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 5984 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 6460 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:17:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.002s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7332 +0s ... 0.003s

#10 got single benchmarks 7332 +0.003s ... 0.005s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 5984 +0s ... 0.005s

#12 got single benchmarks 5984 +0s ... 0.006s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 6460 +0s ... 0.006s

#14 got single benchmarks 6460 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.007s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.014s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.018s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.018s

#19 Got 26 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.023s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.023s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.024s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.027s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.027s

#24 return log +0s ... 0.027s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)