Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G77 MP9 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP6

ARM Mali-G77 MP9

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G77 MP9

The ARM Mali-G77MP9 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2020 in the Mediatek Dimensity 1000 (and 1000+). It integrates 9 of the 16 possible cores and is based on the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency (+60%), a 30% improved performance and a 30% improved efficiency compared to the previous generation (G76).

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

ARM Mali-G57 MP6

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP6

The ARM Mali-G57 MP6 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the HiSilicon Kirin 820 and uses 6 clusters (hence the MP6 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP6 in our benchmarks (in the Kirin 820 / Huawei P40 Lite) is comparable to the Adreno 620 (e.g. Oppo Find X2) and ARM Mali-G72 MP18 (Note10 Lite).

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

show full text
ARM Mali-G77 MP9ARM Mali-G57 MP6
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhallValhall
ArchitectureValhallBifrost
Pipelines9 - unified6 - unified
Shared Memorynono
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology7 nm7 nm
Date of Announcement19.03.2020 03.07.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.comdeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G77 MP9GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 80508 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 13008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 12008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 4 more
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G57 MP6GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 8208 x 1840 MHz? MHz? MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 820e8 x 1840 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
60765 Points (6%)
57067 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 7612     avg: 8312     median: 8226 (36%)     max: 9182 Points
5853 Points (25%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 9823     avg: 11258     median: 11692.5 (26%)     max: 11824 Points
6327 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 6890     avg: 7321     median: 7393.5 (31%)     max: 7606 Points
min: 4281     avg: 4563     median: 4563 (19%)     max: 4845 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7501     avg: 8264     median: 8477 (21%)     max: 8601 Points
min: 4472     avg: 4689     median: 4689 (12%)     max: 4906 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 7301     avg: 7887     median: 7886.5 (70%)     max: 8472 Points
5516 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 8676     avg: 9718     median: 9717.5 (58%)     max: 10759 Points
6158 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
6654 Points (33%)
min: 2571     avg: 3590     median: 3589.5 (18%)     max: 4608 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
7610 Points (25%)
min: 2675     avg: 3740     median: 3739.5 (13%)     max: 4804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 4194     avg: 4405     median: 4405 (2%)     max: 4578 Points
1886 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1205     avg: 1258     median: 1256 (1%)     max: 1300 Points
609 Points (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9     avg: 9.4     median: 9.4 (4%)     max: 9.7 fps
4.8 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.7     avg: 19.6     median: 21 (4%)     max: 22 fps
min: 10     avg: 11     median: 11 (2%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 46     avg: 51.3     median: 51.5 (4%)     max: 56 fps
min: 29     avg: 30     median: 30 (2%)     max: 31 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 39     avg: 44.5     median: 44.5 (4%)     max: 50 fps
min: 21     avg: 24     median: 24 (2%)     max: 27 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 45     avg: 69.8     median: 78 (2%)     max: 79 fps
min: 44     avg: 45.5     median: 45.5 (1%)     max: 47 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 49     avg: 101.5     median: 115 (5%)     max: 129 fps
min: 63     avg: 66     median: 66 (3%)     max: 69 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G77 MP9
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 176     avg: 185.4     median: 182.5 (1%)     max: 202 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP6
min: 103     avg: 107.5     median: 107.5 (1%)     max: 112 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 194863     avg: 220826     median: 221937 (22%)     max: 248060 Points
83516 Points (8%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
217917 Points (17%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 44.45     avg: 56.6     median: 53.8 (1%)     max: 71.3 fps
34.9 fps (1%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
24.8 fps (5%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
4700 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
4718 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 24859     avg: 29891     median: 29132.5 (10%)     max: 36439 Points
min: 12491     avg: 22356     median: 22356 (8%)     max: 32221 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 24901     avg: 32263     median: 32888 (54%)     max: 38376 Points
min: 4354     avg: 6862     median: 6861.5 (11%)     max: 9369 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 3D Graphics Mark
28414 Points (100%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 5.1     median: 6.1 (2%)     max: 6.9 Watt
4.6 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G77 MP9 → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP6 → 57% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
56.5  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
30 30 59.3 60 119 ~ 60 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
58.9 59 59 60 ~ 59 fps
34%
Mali-G57 MP6:
20 20 ~ 20 fps
med.
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
40  fps
high
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
30 30 39.9 40 40 40 40 ~ 37 fps
68%
Mali-G57 MP6:
20 30 ~ 25 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
low
Mali-G57 MP6:
60  fps
high
Mali-G57 MP6:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
50  fps
60%
Mali-G57 MP6:
30  fps
high
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
50 59 60 ~ 56 fps
54%
Mali-G57 MP6:
30  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
119 144 ~ 132 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G77 MP9 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP6 → 54%

ARM Mali-G77 MP9ARM Mali-G57 MP6
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal56.5
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile5940372025
Asphalt 9: Legends50563030
Real Racing 360
Subway Surfers132
ARM Mali-G77 MP9ARM Mali-G57 MP6
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3


1


2
2
1








< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		1
1




1
1










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 00:46:58

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10491 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10451 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:17:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10491 +0.009s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 10491 +0.014s ... 0.026s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10451 +0s ... 0.027s

#11 got single benchmarks 10451 +0s ... 0.027s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.045s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.045s

#15 Got 33 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.05s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.05s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.051s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.053s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.053s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)