Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G77 MP9 vs ARM Mali-G52 MP6

ARM Mali-G77 MP9

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G77 MP9

The ARM Mali-G77MP9 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2020 in the Mediatek Dimensity 1000 (and 1000+). It integrates 9 of the 16 possible cores and is based on the Valhal architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency (+60%), a 30% improved performance and a 30% improved efficiency compared to the previous generation (G76).

The graphics card is one of the fastest in Android devices of 2020 and therefore able to run all games fluently.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1 and OpenCL 2.0.

ARM Mali-G52 MP6

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G52 MP6

The ARM Mali-G52 MP6 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2019 in the HiSilicon Kirin 810 and uses 6 clusters (hence the MP6 name). 

The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.

The performance of the G52MP6 in our benchmarks (in the Kirin 810) is comparable to the Adreno 618 in the Snapdragon 730 and G76MP4 in the Helio G90T.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

show full text
ARM Mali-G77 MP9ARM Mali-G52 MP6
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
CodenameValhall
ArchitectureValhallBifrost
Pipelines9 - unified6 - unified
Shared Memorynono
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology7 nm12 nm
Date of Announcement19.03.2020 06.03.2018
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.comdeveloper.arm.com
CPU in Mali-G77 MP9GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Dimensity 80508 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 13008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 12008 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
» show 4 more
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G52 MP6GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 8108 x 1880 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
60765 Points (6%)
min: 45182     avg: 46563     median: 46944 (5%)     max: 47563 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 7612     avg: 8312     median: 8226 (36%)     max: 9182 Points
min: 3314     avg: 3463     median: 3483 (15%)     max: 3591 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 9823     avg: 11258     median: 11692.5 (26%)     max: 11824 Points
min: 3274     avg: 3389     median: 3406 (7%)     max: 3488 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 6890     avg: 7321     median: 7393.5 (31%)     max: 7606 Points
min: 2515     avg: 2810     median: 2954 (12%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 7501     avg: 8264     median: 8477 (21%)     max: 8601 Points
min: 2328     avg: 2626     median: 2752 (7%)     max: 2798 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 7301     avg: 7887     median: 7886.5 (70%)     max: 8472 Points
min: 3252     avg: 3342     median: 3338 (30%)     max: 3437 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 8676     avg: 9718     median: 9717.5 (58%)     max: 10759 Points
min: 3243     avg: 3318     median: 3327 (20%)     max: 3384 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
6654 Points (33%)
min: 2502     avg: 2748     median: 2837 (14%)     max: 2904 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
7610 Points (25%)
min: 2347     avg: 2599     median: 2710 (9%)     max: 2740 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 4194     avg: 4405     median: 4405 (2%)     max: 4578 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1205     avg: 1258     median: 1256 (1%)     max: 1300 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9     avg: 9.4     median: 9.4 (4%)     max: 9.7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 9.7     avg: 19.6     median: 21 (4%)     max: 22 fps
min: 7.7     avg: 7.8     median: 7.8 (1%)     max: 7.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 46     avg: 51.3     median: 51.5 (4%)     max: 56 fps
min: 20     avg: 21     median: 21 (2%)     max: 22 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 39     avg: 44.5     median: 44.5 (4%)     max: 50 fps
min: 19     avg: 20     median: 20 (2%)     max: 21 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 45     avg: 69.8     median: 78 (2%)     max: 79 fps
min: 33     avg: 34     median: 34 (1%)     max: 35 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 49     avg: 101.5     median: 115 (5%)     max: 129 fps
min: 47     avg: 49.3     median: 48 (2%)     max: 53 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G77 MP9
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 176     avg: 185.4     median: 182.5 (1%)     max: 202 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G52 MP6
min: 85     avg: 87     median: 87 (1%)     max: 89 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 194863     avg: 220826     median: 221937 (22%)     max: 248060 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
217917 Points (17%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 44.45     avg: 56.6     median: 53.8 (1%)     max: 71.3 fps
21.1 fps (1%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
24.8 fps (5%)
8.6 fps (2%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
4700 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
4718 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 24859     avg: 29891     median: 29132.5 (10%)     max: 36439 Points
11576 Points (4%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 24901     avg: 32263     median: 32888 (54%)     max: 38376 Points
3831 Points (6%)
PassMark PerformanceTest 9 - PerformanceTest 9.0 3D Graphics Mark
28414 Points (100%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 5.1     median: 6.1 (2%)     max: 6.9 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G77 MP9 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G52 MP6 → 40% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
56.5  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
30 30 59.3 60 119 ~ 60 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
58.9 59 59 60 ~ 59 fps
68%
Mali-G52 MP6:
40  fps
med.
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
40  fps
100%
Mali-G52 MP6:
40  fps
high
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
30 30 39.9 40 40 40 40 ~ 37 fps
81%
Mali-G52 MP6:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
low
Mali-G52 MP6:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
50  fps
60%
Mali-G52 MP6:
30  fps
high
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
50 59 60 ~ 56 fps
54%
Mali-G52 MP6:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Mali-G77 MP9:
119 144 ~ 132 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G77 MP9 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G52 MP6 → 72%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 84%

ARM Mali-G77 MP9ARM Mali-G52 MP6
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal56.5
Armajet60
PUBG Mobile594037404030
Asphalt 9: Legends50563030
Real Racing 360
Subway Surfers132
ARM Mali-G77 MP9ARM Mali-G52 MP6
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3


1


2
2
1








< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2


1


2










For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 00:49:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10491 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10362 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:17:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.002s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10491 +0s ... 0.003s

#9 got single benchmarks 10491 +0.002s ... 0.005s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10362 +0s ... 0.005s

#11 got single benchmarks 10362 +0s ... 0.005s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.005s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.015s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.015s

#15 Got 37 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.02s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.02s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.02s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.023s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.023s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.023s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)