Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G76 MP12 vs ARM Mali-G57 MP3

ARM Mali-G76 MP12

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G76 MP12

The ARM Mali-G76 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2019 in the Samsung Exynos 9820 (e.g. Galaxy S10 Plus). It integrates 12 of the 20 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing. Compared to the old Mali-G72, the G76 should offer twice the performance per cluster.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G57 MP3

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G57 MP3

The ARM Mali-G57 MP3 is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek Dimensity 800U and uses 3 clusters (hence the MC3/MP3 name). 

The G57 is based on the new Valhall architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. 

The performance of the G57MP3 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek Dimensity 800U / Realme 7 5G) is comparable to the Adreno 620.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

show full text
ARM Mali-G76 MP12ARM Mali-G57 MP3
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitectureBifrostBifrost
Pipelines10 - unified3 - unified
Shared Memorynono
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
technology7 nm7 nm
Date of Announcement31.08.2018 03.07.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagedeveloper.arm.comdeveloper.arm.com
CodenameValhall
CPU in Mali-G76 MP12GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 98258 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 98208 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G57 MP3GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
MediaTek Kompanio 8388 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 800U8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek Dimensity 7208 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 65614     avg: 68730     median: 68654 (7%)     max: 72022 Points
min: 29682     avg: 32144     median: 32143.5 (3%)     max: 34605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4052     avg: 4561     median: 4618 (20%)     max: 5048 Points
min: 3377     avg: 4000     median: 4032.5 (18%)     max: 4467 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4449     avg: 5066     median: 5083 (11%)     max: 5605 Points
min: 3497     avg: 4324     median: 4247.5 (9%)     max: 5012 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 4529     avg: 4827     median: 4720.5 (20%)     max: 5300 Points
min: 2551     avg: 2908     median: 2783.5 (12%)     max: 3291 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5358     avg: 5606     median: 5394.5 (13%)     max: 6087 Points
min: 2375     avg: 2831     median: 2656 (7%)     max: 3304 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 4015     avg: 4653     median: 4502 (40%)     max: 5186 Points
min: 3499     avg: 3946     median: 3993.5 (35%)     max: 4372 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 4507     avg: 5329     median: 5303 (32%)     max: 6058 Points
min: 3694     avg: 4294     median: 4278.5 (26%)     max: 4889 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 4383     avg: 4639     median: 4528 (22%)     max: 5003 Points
min: 2478     avg: 2875     median: 2753 (14%)     max: 3365 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 5152     avg: 5349     median: 5196 (17%)     max: 5712 Points
min: 2326     avg: 2809     median: 2633 (9%)     max: 3317 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 1207     avg: 1337     median: 1226 (1%)     max: 1586 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 331     avg: 393.6     median: 366 (0%)     max: 461 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 2.5     avg: 2.9     median: 2.6 (1%)     max: 3.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 17.2     median: 17 (3%)     max: 18 fps
min: 5.8     avg: 7     median: 6.9 (1%)     max: 8.1 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 38     avg: 43.8     median: 45 (3%)     max: 48 fps
min: 16     avg: 19.2     median: 19.5 (1%)     max: 22 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 21     avg: 35.5     median: 39 (4%)     max: 43 fps
min: 13     avg: 16.9     median: 17 (2%)     max: 20 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 47     avg: 58.7     median: 59 (1%)     max: 67 fps
min: 25     avg: 29.9     median: 28 (1%)     max: 35 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 67     avg: 80     median: 85 (4%)     max: 89 fps
min: 37     avg: 43.8     median: 44 (2%)     max: 51 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G76 MP12
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 50     avg: 103.7     median: 96.5 (1%)     max: 143 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G57 MP3
min: 57     avg: 73.2     median: 71 (1%)     max: 83 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 84032     avg: 91910     median: 90626 (9%)     max: 101071 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 28.5     avg: 36.1     median: 34.4 (1%)     max: 44.63 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
1861 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
7354 Points (3%)
min: 9293     avg: 21578     median: 25659 (9%)     max: 29783 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
6315 Points (10%)
min: 3448     avg: 16034     median: 22192 (37%)     max: 22461 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 2.42     avg: 4.1     median: 4.1 (2%)     max: 5.64 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G76 MP12 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G57 MP3 → 95% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Mali-G57 MP3:
30  fps
ultra Ultra
Mali-G57 MP3:
30  fps
League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
Mali-G57 MP3:
60  fps
ultra
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 60 ~ 45 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 60 60 ~ 50 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
58  fps
69%
Mali-G57 MP3:
39 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
med.
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
39  fps
103%
Mali-G57 MP3:
40  fps
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
38 39 40 40 ~ 39 fps
77%
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 30 30 30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
58 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60  fps
102%
Mali-G57 MP3:
61  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
29 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
100%
Mali-G57 MP3:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G76 MP12 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G57 MP3 → 92%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 91%

ARM Mali-G76 MP12ARM Mali-G57 MP3
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal3030
League of Legends: Wild Rift6045
Armajet50
PUBG Mobile583939404030
Dead Trigger 26061
Asphalt 9: Legends30303030
ARM Mali-G76 MP12ARM Mali-G57 MP3
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2


1


2
1









< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3


1


3
2

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 00:36:57

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9822 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10571 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:17:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9822 +0.015s ... 0.019s

#9 got single benchmarks 9822 +0.006s ... 0.025s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10571 +0s ... 0.026s

#11 got single benchmarks 10571 +0.01s ... 0.035s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.049s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.049s

#15 Got 50 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.054s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.054s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.055s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.058s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.058s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.059s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)