Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M4 8-core GPU vs Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU

Apple M4 8-core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M4 8-Core GPU

The 8-core Apple M4 GPU is a graphics adapter built into the smallest Apple M4 series SoC that debuted in October 2024 alongside the new iMac. It isn't clear if this is a 10-core M4 GPU with two cores disabled, or if Apple actually makes an entirely new M4 SoC now that has fewer CPU and GPU cores by design.

A few popular video codecs can be HW-decoded and HW-encoded here but the list is nowhere near as long as what current AMD iGPUs deliver, let alone Intel iGPUs. However, there is a healthy selection of modern technologies such as ray tracing on offer.

Just like the rest of the Apple M4 chip, the graphics adapter is manufactured on a "second generation 3 nm" TSMC process that's still cutting-edge, as of late 2024. It has access to the 16 or 24 gigabytes of fast on-package LPDDR5x-7500 RAM and, apart from the iMac's internal display, allows one to connect one more monitor with an "up to 6K" resolution whereas the 10-core M4 GPU can drive 2 such monitors.

Its performance is slated to be around 15% lower than that of the 10-core M4 GPU. Still, it's going to be at least as fast as the Radeon 760M in many tasks, including gaming.

Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU

► remove from comparison Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU

The Apple M4 Pro 16-core GPU is an integrated graphics card developed by Apple and integrated into the 12-core Apple M4 Pro SoC. It has 16 of the 20 graphics cores and, depending on the configuration, has access to at least 24 GB of fast 273 GB/s LPDDR5x on-package RAM (unified memory). As is typical for graphics cards from 2024, it has hardware support for ray tracing, mesh shading and other modern technologies. It also supports external displays with resolutions up to 8K and can decode some common video codecs such as h.264, h.265 and AV1 HW.

Performance

Its gaming performance is highly dependent on the game and if it is using emulation or if it is optimized for Apple silicon. In Baldur's Gate 3, for example, the iGPU is similar to a GeForce RTX 4050 in Windows 11. In synthetic benchmarks, the performance looks much better and can compete with an RTX 4060. The old M3 Pro 18-core GPU can easily be beaten despite the higher core count.

Power consumption

Under heavy CPU and GPU load, the iGPU part of the 12-core M4 Pro consumes approx. 25 W (Unigine Valley, max) according to the monitoring software "powermetrics".

Just like the rest of the Apple M4 Pro chip, the integrated graphics card is manufactured in a "second generation 3 nm" TSMC process, which will still be modern at the end of 2024.

Apple M4 8-core GPUApple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU
Apple M4 Series
M4 Max 40-Core GPU compare 40 ? Bit @ 8533 MHz
M4 Max 32-Core GPU compare 32 ? Bit @ 8533 MHz
M4 Pro 20-Core GPU compare 20 ? Bit @ 8533 MHz
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU 16
M4 10-Core GPU compare 10
M4 8-Core GPU 8
M4 Max 40-Core GPU compare 40 ? Bit @ 8533 MHz
M4 Max 32-Core GPU compare 32 ? Bit @ 8533 MHz
M4 Pro 20-Core GPU compare 20 ? Bit @ 8533 MHz
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU 16
M4 10-Core GPU compare 10
M4 8-Core GPU 8
Pipelines8 - unified16 - unified
Memory TypeLPDDR5X-7500LPDDR5x-8533
Shared Memoryyesyes
Power Consumption4 Watt
technology3 nm3 nm
Date of Announcement28.10.2024 30.10.2024
PredecessorM3 8-Core GPUM3 Pro 14-Core GPU
Memory Bandwidth273 GB/s
CPU in M4 8-Core GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Apple M4 (8 cores)8 x 2900 MHz, 5 W? MHz? MHz
CPU in M4 Pro 16-Core GPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Apple M4 Pro (12 cores)12 x 2592 MHz, 32 W? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
7612 Points (9%)
16143 Points (19%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom METAL *
110 Seconds (12%)
52 Seconds (5%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 153.03     avg: 155     median: 155 (9%)     max: 157 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.5 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
48.5 fps (18%)
min: 103.3     avg: 103.8     median: 103.8 (39%)     max: 104.2 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
106.7 fps (19%)
min: 234.5     avg: 236.4     median: 236.4 (42%)     max: 238.2 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
304.8 fps (23%)
min: 635.5     avg: 641     median: 640.5 (47%)     max: 645.5 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
231.4 fps (22%)
min: 501.5     avg: 503     median: 502.9 (48%)     max: 504.2 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
324.7 fps (7%)
393 fps (8%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
520 fps (22%)
1133 fps (47%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M4 8-core GPU
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
810 fps (6%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU
1860 fps (15%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
30872 Points (8%)
min: 60234     avg: 60370     median: 60370 (16%)     max: 60506 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Metal
48032 Points (27%)
min: 97610     avg: 98333     median: 98332.5 (55%)     max: 99055 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
60.6 Watt (23%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
18.5 Watt (6%)
68.6 Watt (22%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
21.5 Watt (3%)
min: 56.6     avg: 64     median: 64 (8%)     max: 71.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra
0.6 fps per Watt (85%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M4 8-core GPU → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU → 205% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
98  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
78.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
62.9  fps
231%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
145  fps
QHD 2560x1440
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
95.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
47.8  fps
low 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
53.2  fps
122%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
64.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
46.3  fps
116%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
53.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
40.7  fps
121%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
49.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
28.7  fps
178%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
49.9 51.4 ~ 51 fps
QHD 2560x1440
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
46.2 46.7 ~ 46 fps
4K 3840x2160
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
23  fps
low 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
25.9  fps
208%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
53.5 55.2 ~ 54 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
20.3  fps
236%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
47.5 49.2 ~ 48 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
17  fps
241%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
39.8 41.3 ~ 41 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
14.3  fps
245%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
35.1 35.7 ~ 35 fps
low 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
39.7  fps
212%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
84  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
27.8  fps
255%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
71  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
23.1  fps
229%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
53  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
22.6  fps
226%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
50.3 51 ~ 51 fps
QHD 2560x1440
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
36 36 ~ 36 fps
4K 3840x2160
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
18  fps
low 1280x720
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
92.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
70.2  fps
high 1920x1080
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
53.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
39.9  fps
QHD 2560x1440
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
31.6  fps
4K 3840x2160
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
17.6  fps
low 1280x720
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
316.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
103.4  fps
high 1920x1080
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
66.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
49.6  fps
QHD 2560x1440
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
31.5  fps
low 1280x720
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
103  fps
186%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
185 198 ~ 192 fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
39  fps
241%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
89 99 ~ 94 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
34  fps
259%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
86 89 ~ 88 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
M4 8-Core GPU:
30  fps
257%
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
76 78 ~ 77 fps
QHD 2560x1440
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
50 51 ~ 51 fps
4K 3840x2160
M4 Pro 16-Core GPU:
26  fps

Average Gaming Apple M4 8-core GPU → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Apple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU → 210%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 192%

Apple M4 8-core GPUApple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Civilization 79878.262.914595.947.8
Total War Pharaoh53.246.340.728.764.853.549.3514623
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty25.920.31714.354484135
Baldur's Gate 339.727.823.122.6847153513618
Shadow of the Tomb Raider1033934301929488775126
Apple M4 8-core GPUApple M4 Pro 16-Core GPU
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
3
1







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
2
1

2
2

3
1
1

3
1

3
1
3
1

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 05. 20:26:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12846 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12883 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 04 May 2025 05:16:42 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12846 +0.012s ... 0.018s

#9 got single benchmarks 12846 +0.003s ... 0.021s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12883 +0s ... 0.021s

#11 got single benchmarks 12883 +0.004s ... 0.025s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.035s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.035s

#15 Got 89 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.04s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.04s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.04s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.043s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.043s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.043s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)