Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Dimensity 9400 vs Mediatek Dimensity 9400+

Mediatek Dimensity 9400

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 9400

The Mediatek Dimensity 9400 is the Taiwanese company's latest flagship SoC for premium Android phones and tablets, as of Nov 2024. It sports 1 Cortex-X925 core running at up to 3.62 GHz along with 3 Cortex-X4 cores (up to 3.25 GHz) and 4 Cortex-A720 cores (up to 2 GHz). The Immortalis-G925 MP12 serves as the integrated GPU and there is also the MediaTek 890 8th generation NPU with one "performance" core and one "flexible" core. Naturally, 5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth and satellite navigation are included, too.

Architecture and Features

The CPU is based on the ARM v9.2 architecture to a certain degree. There are no "little" cores here, much like it was with the Dimensity 9300 (4x Cortex-X4 and 4x Cortex-A720 cores). This is an approach that's vastly different to what all other ARM chipmakers do.

The manufacturer has given a boost to the level 3 and SLC caches compared to the previous-gen chip, which now have a combined capacity of 22 MB (12 MB L3 + 10 MB system cache). LPDDR5x RAM as fast as 10667 MT/s is supported; there are other cool features such as the 12-transistor L1 cache system and "up to 1.5 km" Bluetooth coverage.

Performance

The chip delivers ~9000 Geekbench 6.3 Multi points, making it a few percentage points faster than the Apple A18 Pro and about 20% faster than the Dimensity 9300.

Graphics

The ARM-developed Immortalis-G925 GPU (the 12-core variety) comes with hardware ray tracing, Accuracy Super Resolution and more. It's ready to power three-display folding phones as well as drive "WQHD+" resolution displays at up to 180 Hz, and it HW-decodes the codecs that matter most - AVC, HEVC, VP9, AV1.

The ~2700 3DMark Steel Nomad Light points that it delivers make it almost as fast as the Qualcomm Adreno 830.

Power consumption

Its peak power consumption is reportedly very high at well over 10 W. Gaming phones with advanced cooling solution are set to get much better performance (especially sustained performance) out of the SoC than regular thin models.

The Dimensity is built with TSMC's N3E process which is still state-of-the-art as of late 2024.

Mediatek Dimensity 9400+

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 9400+

The Mediatek Dimensity 9400 Plus is a higher-end octa-core SoC for Android tablets and smartphones that was launched on April 10, 2025. As such, it is said to feature one super-powerful Cortex-X925 core (up to 3.73 GHz), three Cortex-X4 cores (up to 3.3 GHz) and four efficient Cortex-A720 cores (up to 2.4 GHz) along with the dedicated 890 NPU and Immortalis-G925 MC12 iGPU. The older Dimensity 9400 features the same key components, their lower clock speeds being the differentiating factor.

A chip for flagship 2025 and 2026 products, the Dimensity comes with powerful navigation and networking capabilities, including Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6 and other nice features such as support for three displays. It is built with TSMC's N3E process.

Performance

Given the clock speed improvement over the Dimensity 9400, its Geekbench multi-thread performance scores should be slightly higher than those of Apple's M1 and A18 Pro as well as Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Elite.

Long-term performance sustainability will depend greatly on how sound heat dissipation is in a particular tablet or smartphone.

Power consumption

Its short-term power consumption is set to be very high at way over 10 W.

ModelMediatek Dimensity 9400Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
CodenameCortex-X925, X4, A720Cortex-X925, X4, A720
SeriesMediatek Dimensity 9000Mediatek Dimensity 9000
Series: Dimensity 9000 Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ - 3.73 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3 Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 « 2 - 3.62 GHz8 / 8 cores22 MB L3 Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e compare2 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores22 MB L3 Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ « - 3.73 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3 Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Mediatek Dimensity 94002 - 3.62 GHz8 / 8 cores22 MB L3 Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e compare2 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores22 MB L3 Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Clock2000 - 3620 MHz <=3730 MHz
L2 Cache7 MB3.5 MB
L3 Cache22 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
1 x 3.6 GHz ARM Cortex-X925
3 x 3.3 GHz ARM Cortex-X4
4 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A720
8 / 8
1 x 3.7 GHz ARM Cortex-X925
3 x 3.3 GHz ARM Cortex-X4
4 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A720
Transistors29100 Million
Technology3 nm3 nm
Features5G (3GPP, Sub-6GHz), Wi-Fi 7, BT 6.0, UFS 4, LPDDR5X 10667 Mbps, NPU 8905G, Wi-Fi 7, BT 6.0, UFS 4, LPDDR5X-10667 RAM, NPU 890
iGPUARM Immortalis-G925 MC12ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
10632 Points (100%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2589     avg: 2647     median: 2605 (65%)     max: 2748 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 7480     avg: 8044     median: 8078 (31%)     max: 8574 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1838     avg: 1973     median: 1998 (78%)     max: 2084 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5870     avg: 7131     median: 7398 (13%)     max: 8126 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7074 Points (71%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
27283 Points (27%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 431.56     avg: 572     median: 625.4 (1%)     max: 660.34 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 56843     avg: 68258     median: 60987 (46%)     max: 86943 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 147     avg: 182.7     median: 176 (48%)     max: 225 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 2374540     avg: 2503070     median: 2429500 (81%)     max: 2705160 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 398259     avg: 512572     median: 532245 (16%)     max: 607213 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
72.4 MB/s (49%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
1730 MB/s (49%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
44.6 MB/s (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1725 MB/s (48%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
158502 Points (70%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 12314     avg: 14793     median: 15849 (58%)     max: 16216 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1145     avg: 1469     median: 1599 (60%)     max: 1663 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.9     avg: 7.3     median: 7.8 (3%)     max: 8.21 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.685     avg: 0.9     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 1.251 Watt

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Dimensity 9400 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 19. 05:31:56

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18562 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18618 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Jun 2025 05:19:16 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18562 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 18562 +0.006s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18618 +0s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 18618 +0s ... 0.013s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.021s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.021s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)