Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 268V vs Intel Core Ultra 7 256V vs Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

Intel Core Ultra 7 268V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 268V

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V is a higher-end Lunar Lake family processor. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It sports 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.7 GHz and 5.0 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 140V iGPU and 32 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 48 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well. A vPro-enabled version of the CPU became available in early 2025.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 7 266V is the amount of on-package, non-replaceable RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestmont, the difference is much higher at 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 268V has a very healthy 12 MB of level 3 cache; elsewhere, it has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 48 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

The 268V should be just a couple of percentage points faster than the 258V for an Core Ultra 7 165U or Core i7-1360P-like multi-thread performance, provided it's running at the default long-term TDP power target which is 17 W.

Generally speaking, the 288V, 268V, 266V, 258V, 256V are faster than the 238V, 236V, 228V and 226V due to the difference in their last-level cache size (8 MB vs 12 MB) as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. It depends on the TDP figures of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 140V is here to replace the Arc 8 iGPU. Its 8 Xe² architecture "cores" run at up to 2,000 MHz and it also has 8 ray tracing units at its disposal. The adapter is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of popular video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

All 2023 and 2024 games are playable at 1080p on low graphics settings or higher with this iGPU. We got well over 30 fps in Ghost of Tsushima and almost 40 fps in Baldur's Gate 3. This means the Radeon 780M gets left behind while the Radeon 890M reigns supreme.

Power consumption

This 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads. The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

The Intel Core Ultra 5 256V is an upper mid-range Lunar Lake family processor. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It sports 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.7 GHz and 4.8 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 140V iGPU and 16 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 47 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 7 258V is the amount of on-package, non-replaceable RAM: 16 GB vs 32 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestmont, the difference is much higher at 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 256V has a very healthy 12 MB of level 3 cache; elsewhere, it has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 47 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

Based on the time we've had with 2 systems powered by the 256V, the chip's multi-thread performance is as good as that of the Core Ultra 7 165U and the Core i7-1360P. Please note that both systems had a higher long-term TDP power target than the Intel-recommended value: 30 W and 32 W vs 17 W.

Generally speaking, the 288V, 268V, 266V, 258V, 256V are faster than the 238V, 236V, 228V and 226V due to the difference in their last-level cache size (8 MB vs 12 MB) as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. It depends on the TDP figures of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 140V is here to replace the Arc 8 iGPU. Its 8 Xe² architecture "cores" run at up to 1,950 MHz and it also has 8 ray tracing units at its disposal. The adapter is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of popular video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

All 2023 and 2024 games are playable at 1080p on low graphics settings or higher with this iGPU. We got well over 30 fps in Ghost of Tsushima and almost 40 fps in Baldur's Gate 3. This means the Radeon 780M gets left behind while the Radeon 890M reigns supreme.

Power consumption

This 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads. The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 258V

The Intel Core Ultra 5 258V is an upper mid-range Lunar Lake family processor. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It sports 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.7 GHz and 4.8 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 140V iGPU and 32 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 47 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 7 256V is the amount of on-package, non-replaceable RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestmont, the difference is much higher at 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 258V has a very healthy 12 MB of level 3 cache; elsewhere, it has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 47 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

Based on the time we've had with 2 systems powered by the 258V, the chip's multi-thread performance is as good as that of the Core Ultra 7 165U and the Core i7-1360P. Please note that one of the two systems had a higher long-term TDP power target than the Intel-recommended value: 32 W vs 17 W.

Generally speaking, the 288V, 268V, 266V, 258V, 256V are faster than the 238V, 236V, 228V and 226V due to the difference in their last-level cache size (8 MB vs 12 MB) as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. It depends on the TDP figures of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 140V is here to replace the Arc 8 iGPU. Its 8 Xe² architecture "cores" run at up to 1,950 MHz and it also has 8 ray tracing units at its disposal. The adapter is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of popular video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

All 2023 and 2024 games are playable at 1080p on low graphics settings or higher with this iGPU. We got well over 30 fps in Ghost of Tsushima and almost 40 fps in Baldur's Gate 3. This means the Radeon 780M gets left behind while the Radeon 890M reigns supreme.

Power consumption

This 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads. The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 268VIntel Core Ultra 7 256VIntel Core Ultra 7 258V
CodenameLunar LakeLunar LakeLunar Lake
SeriesIntel Lunar LakeIntel Lunar LakeIntel Lunar Lake
Series: Lunar Lake Lunar Lake
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V « 2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V « 2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V « 2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2200 - 5000 MHz2200 - 4800 MHz2200 - 4800 MHz
L1 Cache1.4 MB1.4 MB1.4 MB
L2 Cache14 MB14 MB14 MB
L3 Cache12 MB12 MB12 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
4 x 5.0 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
8 / 8
4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
8 / 8
4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP17 Watt17 Watt17 Watt
TDP Turbo PL237 Watt37 Watt37 Watt
Technology3 nm3 nm3 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2833BGA2833BGA2833
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (48 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHALPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (47 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHALPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (47 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Arc Graphics 140V ( - 2000 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 140V ( - 1950 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core Ultra 7 268V
39.4 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core Ultra 7 256V
38.5 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core Ultra 7 258V
38.4 pt (64%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 123.3     avg: 124.1     median: 124.1 (70%)     max: 124.9 Points
min: 117.4     avg: 118.5     median: 118 (66%)     max: 120 Points
min: 107.8     avg: 118     median: 119.4 (67%)     max: 123 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 600     avg: 610     median: 609.5 (11%)     max: 619 Points
min: 435     avg: 549     median: 582 (11%)     max: 630 Points
min: 406     avg: 557     median: 573 (11%)     max: 660 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9835     avg: 10413     median: 10535 (10%)     max: 10868 Points
min: 8589     avg: 10070     median: 10460.5 (10%)     max: 10768 Points
min: 9114     avg: 10387     median: 10516 (10%)     max: 11097 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1910     avg: 1939     median: 1921 (82%)     max: 1985 Points
min: 1875     avg: 1890     median: 1890.5 (80%)     max: 1902 Points
min: 1664     avg: 1852     median: 1870 (79%)     max: 1947 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 736     avg: 746     median: 739 (82%)     max: 764 Points
min: 720     avg: 726     median: 727 (81%)     max: 730 Points
min: 643     avg: 708     median: 715.5 (79%)     max: 749 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3811     avg: 4065     median: 4129 (10%)     max: 4255 Points
min: 4038     avg: 4102     median: 4106 (10%)     max: 4162 Points
min: 3530     avg: 4031     median: 4082 (10%)     max: 4314 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1601     avg: 1623     median: 1616 (10%)     max: 1651 Points
min: 1570     avg: 1599     median: 1598.5 (10%)     max: 1627 Points
min: 1504     avg: 1598     median: 1601.5 (10%)     max: 1656 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 287     avg: 296     median: 299 (84%)     max: 302 Points
min: 285     avg: 285.5     median: 285.5 (80%)     max: 286 Points
min: 258     avg: 284.1     median: 288 (81%)     max: 298 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
19.7 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.4 Points (80%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9982 Points (60%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36479 Points (26%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
296.1 s (1%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
9.2 s (5%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
8536 Points (14%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 32797     avg: 35031     median: 35687 (20%)     max: 36610 MIPS
min: 35535     avg: 35821     median: 35950 (21%)     max: 35978 MIPS
min: 32198     avg: 35313     median: 35973 (21%)     max: 36724 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5884     avg: 5965     median: 5991 (71%)     max: 6021 MIPS
min: 5616     avg: 5697     median: 5727 (68%)     max: 5749 MIPS
min: 5265     avg: 5695     median: 5756.5 (68%)     max: 5869 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.4     avg: 12.1     median: 12.9 (23%)     max: 12.9 fps
min: 13     avg: 13.2     median: 13.1 (23%)     max: 13.5 fps
min: 10.5     avg: 12.6     median: 12.8 (22%)     max: 14.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.2 GB/s (35%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.4 GB/s (24%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.6 GB/s (20%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 555     avg: 606     median: 564 (7%)     max: 698 Seconds
min: 533     avg: 549     median: 534 (7%)     max: 580 Seconds
min: 509     avg: 578     median: 572 (7%)     max: 700 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 337     avg: 361.3     median: 337 (2%)     max: 410 Seconds
min: 324     avg: 330.7     median: 329 (2%)     max: 339 Seconds
min: 315     avg: 349.1     median: 342.5 (2%)     max: 414 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4344     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4565 sec
min: 0.4578     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4645 sec
min: 0.4457     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4852 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10693 Points (23%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
17.8 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
418.4 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
40813 Points (31%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12177     avg: 14494     median: 15475 (39%)     max: 15830 Points
min: 14943     avg: 15126     median: 15079 (38%)     max: 15356 Points
min: 13464     avg: 15076     median: 15296.5 (38%)     max: 15903 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
94008 Points (76%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
10990 Points (28%)
min: 13840     avg: 14107     median: 13988 (35%)     max: 14493 Points
min: 12378     avg: 13787     median: 13905 (35%)     max: 14569 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 16799     avg: 20271     median: 21928 (39%)     max: 22087 Points
min: 14488     avg: 19994     median: 21614.5 (39%)     max: 22257 Points
min: 18279     avg: 21088     median: 21243 (38%)     max: 22333 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5865     avg: 7291     median: 7784 (33%)     max: 8224 Points
min: 4853     avg: 6273     median: 6586.5 (28%)     max: 7066 Points
min: 2097     avg: 6529     median: 6807.5 (29%)     max: 8295 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2583     avg: 2780     median: 2832 (71%)     max: 2871 Points
min: 2680     avg: 2748     median: 2763 (69%)     max: 2784 Points
min: 2593     avg: 2738     median: 2759 (69%)     max: 2795 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 10589     avg: 11042     median: 11095 (43%)     max: 11388 Points
min: 9852     avg: 10701     median: 10962 (43%)     max: 11026 Points
min: 9311     avg: 10906     median: 11008 (43%)     max: 11334 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2008     avg: 2051     median: 2049.5 (80%)     max: 2097 Points
min: 1972     avg: 1994     median: 2000 (78%)     max: 2010 Points
min: 1891     avg: 1995     median: 2004.5 (78%)     max: 2046 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9491     avg: 9728     median: 9783.5 (18%)     max: 9855 Points
min: 9302     avg: 9427     median: 9361 (17%)     max: 9618 Points
min: 7717     avg: 9494     median: 9654 (17%)     max: 9864 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 468     avg: 473     median: 475 (1%)     max: 476 ms
min: 472     avg: 475.3     median: 474 (1%)     max: 480 ms
min: 468     avg: 487.3     median: 473 (1%)     max: 559 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 111219     avg: 113072     median: 113072 (87%)     max: 114924 Points
min: 94615     avg: 107955     median: 112290 (86%)     max: 113526 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 245     avg: 269.7     median: 277 (76%)     max: 287 Points
min: 281.6     avg: 283.9     median: 284 (78%)     max: 286 Points
min: 199.5     avg: 267.3     median: 280 (77%)     max: 291 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 266     avg: 288.7     median: 290 (52%)     max: 310 Points
min: 243     avg: 286.3     median: 306 (55%)     max: 310 Points
min: 219     avg: 279.4     median: 287 (52%)     max: 314 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1643     avg: 1715     median: 1738 (65%)     max: 1763 Points
min: 1636     avg: 1678     median: 1663 (62%)     max: 1736 Points
min: 1590     avg: 1695     median: 1714 (64%)     max: 1742 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41     avg: 44.3     median: 41.5 (7%)     max: 50.4 Watt
min: 42.2     avg: 47.3     median: 46.1 (8%)     max: 53.6 Watt
min: 33.3     avg: 45.5     median: 46.2 (8%)     max: 55.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41.5     avg: 49.8     median: 51.2 (9%)     max: 56.8 Watt
min: 50.9     avg: 54     median: 54 (10%)     max: 57.1 Watt
min: 48.8     avg: 53.9     median: 53.5 (10%)     max: 59.4 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.2     avg: 3.5     median: 3.7 (2%)     max: 3.7 Watt
min: 1.596     avg: 2.6     median: 2.6 (2%)     max: 3.63 Watt
min: 3.4     avg: 4.6     median: 4.6 (3%)     max: 6.6 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.2     avg: 4.8     median: 5.2 (6%)     max: 5.92 Watt
min: 1.954     avg: 4.2     median: 5.1 (6%)     max: 5.48 Watt
min: 3.43     avg: 5.2     median: 5.6 (6%)     max: 6.53 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 28.5     avg: 33.2     median: 31.3 (23%)     max: 39.8 Points per Watt
30.8 Points per Watt (23%)
min: 28.5     avg: 29.7     median: 29.4 (22%)     max: 31.7 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 268V → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 256V → 99% n=26

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 258V → 99% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 02. 13:33:03

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17991 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17996 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 17995 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 01 May 2025 05:16:08 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17991 +0.003s ... 0.012s

#9 got single benchmarks 17991 +0.006s ... 0.017s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 17996 +0.003s ... 0.02s

#11 got single benchmarks 17996 +0.007s ... 0.027s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17995 +0.003s ... 0.03s

#13 got single benchmarks 17995 +0.018s ... 0.048s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.048s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.053s ... 0.101s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.101s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)