Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 268V vs Intel Core Ultra 5 236V vs Intel Core Ultra 5 226V

Intel Core Ultra 7 268V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 7 268V

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V is a higher-end Lunar Lake family processor. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It sports 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.7 GHz and 5.0 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 140V iGPU and 32 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 48 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well. A vPro-enabled version of the CPU became available in early 2025.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 7 266V is the amount of on-package, non-replaceable RAM: 32 GB vs 16 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestmont, the difference is much higher at 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 268V has a very healthy 12 MB of level 3 cache; elsewhere, it has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 48 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

The 268V should be just a couple of percentage points faster than the 258V for an Core Ultra 7 165U or Core i7-1360P-like multi-thread performance, provided it's running at the default long-term TDP power target which is 17 W.

Generally speaking, the 288V, 268V, 266V, 258V, 256V are faster than the 238V, 236V, 228V and 226V due to the difference in their last-level cache size (8 MB vs 12 MB) as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. It depends on the TDP figures of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 140V is here to replace the Arc 8 iGPU. Its 8 Xe² architecture "cores" run at up to 2,000 MHz and it also has 8 ray tracing units at its disposal. The adapter is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of popular video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

All 2023 and 2024 games are playable at 1080p on low graphics settings or higher with this iGPU. We got well over 30 fps in Ghost of Tsushima and almost 40 fps in Baldur's Gate 3. This means the Radeon 780M gets left behind while the Radeon 890M reigns supreme.

Power consumption

This 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads. The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

Intel Core Ultra 5 236V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 5 236V

The Intel Core Ultra 5 236V is a mid-range Lunar Lake family processor. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It features 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.5 GHz and 4.7 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 130V iGPU and 16 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 40 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well. A vPro-enabled version of the CPU became available in early 2025.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 5 238V is the amount of on-package, non-upgradeable RAM: 16 GB vs 32 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestmont, the difference is much higher at 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 236V's level 3 cache is pretty small as compared to more expensive Ultra 7 2xxV and Ultra 9 2xxV chips at 8 MB vs 12 MB. Elsewhere, the 236V has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 40 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

Based on Geekbench 6.3 Multi test results available online in early Nov 2024, the 236V (and the 238V) delivers around 10,100 points, putting it on equal footing with chips such as AMD's Ryzen 7 7735HS and Apple's M2 which is an OK result for a thin-and-light laptop in late 2024.

Generally speaking, the 226V, 228V, 236V and 238V are slower than the 256V, 258V, 266V, 268V, 288V due to the difference in their last-level cache size (8 MB vs 12 MB) as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. It depends on the TDP figures of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 130V has 7 Xe² architecture "cores" running at up to 1,850 MHz, as well as 7 ray tracing units at its disposal. This is a direct successor to the Arc 7 iGPU; it is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

Its performance can be vastly different depending on which benchmarks and games one runs. Oftentimes, it isn't much faster than its direct predecessor, the Arc 7. It is clear the 130V isn't fast enough to run most triple-A 2024 games at 1080p. However, it's still more than good enough for an occasional gaming session.

Power consumption

This 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads. The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

Intel Core Ultra 5 226V

► remove from comparison Intel Core Ultra 5 226V

The Intel Core Ultra 5 226V is one of the 2 slowest Lunar Lake family processors as of Nov 2024. This is an SoC for use in tablets and laptops of the slimmer kind that was unveiled in Autumn 2024. It features 4 new Skymont E-cores and 4 new Lion Cove P-cores running at up to 3.5 GHz and 4.5 GHz respectively, along with the new Arc 130V iGPU and 16 GB of on-package LPDDR5x-8533 RAM. A new 40 TOPS neural engine, Thunderbolt 4 and PCIe 5 SSD support are included as well.

The only difference between this chip and the Ultra 5 228V is the amount of on-package, non-replaceable RAM: 16 GB vs 32 GB respectively.

Architecture and Features

Lunar Lake is built using the Foveros technology (stacking several dies on top of each other and next to each other), just like Meteor Lake was. The new chips make use of the enormous BGA2833 socket interface. Of the 8 cores, not a single one is Hyper-Threading-enabled which is the opposite of what AMD currently does with its Zen 5/5c chips.

Intel claims Lion Cove cores bring a 14% IPC improvement over Redwood Cove. For Skymont and Crestmont, the difference is a staggering 68%. Several tweaks and improvements are present here, such as the Low Latency Fabric that is supposed to make small data transfers between cores/caches a lot faster. The 226V's level 3 cache is pretty small as compared to more expensive Ultra 7 2xxV and Ultra 9 2xxV chips at 8 MB vs 12 MB. Elsewhere, the 226V has 4 PCIe 5 and 4 PCIe 4 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices, including NVMe SSDs at up to 15.75 GB/s. Thunderbolt 4 support is onboard by default, as is support for CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 cards from Intel. The 40 TOPS "AI Boost" neural engine is present along with technologies such as Threat Detection to make AI-enabled applications such as the Windows Defender more powerful.

Intel is predicted to get short of on-package RAM in subsequent CPU generations.

Performance

Our in-house testing of an Acer laptop powered by the Ultra 5 chip revealed the latter to be about as fast as the Ryzen 7 7730U and the Ryzen 7 7735U in multi-threaded tasks which is OK but not mind-blowing for late 2024. It is worth noting that the laptop in question does not use the Intel-recommended 17 W long-term power target; instead, the processor gets 30 W to eat which affects its benchmark scores significantly.

Generally speaking, the 226V, 228V, 236V and 238V are slower than the 256V, 258V, 266V, 268V, 288V due to the difference in their last-level cache size as well as clock speeds. However, the difference in performance between the slowest Lunar Lake chip, the 226V, and the fastest chip, the 288V is fairly small at around 10% to 15%. Exact figures depend on the TDP values of the laptops being pitted against each other more than on anything else.

Graphics

The Arc Graphics 130V has 7 Xe² architecture "cores" running at up to 1,850 MHz, as well as 7 ray tracing units at its disposal. This is a direct successor to the Arc 7 iGPU; it is DirectX 12 Ultimate-enabled and able to HW-decode a long list of video codecs such as h.266 VVC, h.265 HEVC, h.264 AVC, AV1 and VP9. Three SUHD 4320p monitors can be used simultaneously with this iGPU.

Its performance can be vastly different depending on which benchmarks and games one runs. Oftentimes, it isn't much faster than its direct predecessor, the Arc 7. It is clear the 130V isn't fast enough to run most triple-A 2024 games at 1080p. However, it's still more than good enough for an occasional gaming session.

Power consumption

While this 2nd generation Core Ultra processor is supposed to consume 17 W when under long-term workloads, the only laptop powered by this chip that we have tested as of early Nov 2024 has a much higher value than that at 30 W.

The Intel-recommended short-term power limit for the chip sits at 37 W.

ModelIntel Core Ultra 7 268VIntel Core Ultra 5 236VIntel Core Ultra 5 226V
CodenameLunar LakeLunar LakeLunar Lake
SeriesIntel Lunar LakeIntel Lunar LakeIntel Lunar Lake
Series: Lunar Lake Lunar Lake
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V « 2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V « 2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V « 2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2200 - 5000 MHz2100 - 4700 MHz2100 - 4500 MHz
L1 Cache1.4 MB1.4 MB1.4 MB
L2 Cache14 MB14 MB14 MB
L3 Cache12 MB8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
4 x 5.0 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
8 / 8
4 x 4.7 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
8 / 8
4 x 4.5 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP17 Watt17 Watt17 Watt
TDP Turbo PL237 Watt37 Watt37 Watt
Technology3 nm3 nm3 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA2833BGA2833BGA2833
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (48 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHALPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (40 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHALPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (40 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHA
iGPUIntel Arc Graphics 140V ( - 2000 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 130V ( - 1850 MHz)Intel Arc Graphics 130V ( - 1850 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core Ultra 7 268V
39.4 pt (66%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Core Ultra 5 226V
36.3 pt (60%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 123.3     avg: 124.1     median: 124.1 (70%)     max: 124.9 Points
min: 111     avg: 111.8     median: 111.7 (63%)     max: 113 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 600     avg: 610     median: 609.5 (11%)     max: 619 Points
min: 530     avg: 580     median: 590.5 (11%)     max: 609 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9835     avg: 10413     median: 10535 (10%)     max: 10868 Points
min: 9827     avg: 9869     median: 9854 (9%)     max: 9940 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1910     avg: 1939     median: 1921 (82%)     max: 1985 Points
min: 1699     avg: 1722     median: 1720 (73%)     max: 1749 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 736     avg: 746     median: 739 (82%)     max: 764 Points
min: 653     avg: 663     median: 661.5 (73%)     max: 674 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3811     avg: 4065     median: 4129 (10%)     max: 4255 Points
min: 3835     avg: 3855     median: 3849 (9%)     max: 3885 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1601     avg: 1623     median: 1616 (10%)     max: 1651 Points
min: 1483     avg: 1502     median: 1505.5 (10%)     max: 1514 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 287     avg: 296     median: 299 (84%)     max: 302 Points
min: 261     avg: 265     median: 264.5 (74%)     max: 270 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
19.1 Points (25%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.1 Points (75%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
9738 Points (59%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
42086 Points (30%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4824 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 32797     avg: 35031     median: 35687 (20%)     max: 36610 MIPS
min: 33099     avg: 33170     median: 33110 (19%)     max: 33302 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5884     avg: 5965     median: 5991 (71%)     max: 6021 MIPS
min: 5272     avg: 5304     median: 5305 (63%)     max: 5335 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
93.6 fps (31%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
305.4 fps (70%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 10.4     avg: 12.1     median: 12.9 (23%)     max: 12.9 fps
min: 12.2     avg: 12.6     median: 12.6 (22%)     max: 12.8 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.6 GB/s (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.1 GB/s (19%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
7.1 GB/s (18%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 555     avg: 606     median: 564 (7%)     max: 698 Seconds
min: 550     avg: 578     median: 568 (7%)     max: 624 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 337     avg: 361.3     median: 337 (2%)     max: 410 Seconds
min: 346     avg: 350.5     median: 350.5 (2%)     max: 355 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4344     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4565 sec
min: 0.4808     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4873 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
10506 Points (22%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.8 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
19.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
458.3 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
48122 Points (37%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 12177     avg: 14494     median: 15475 (39%)     max: 15830 Points
min: 14236     avg: 14349     median: 14353.5 (36%)     max: 14451 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
76606 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
10990 Points (28%)
min: 13013     avg: 13184     median: 13183.5 (33%)     max: 13354 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 16799     avg: 20271     median: 21928 (39%)     max: 22087 Points
min: 19392     avg: 19765     median: 19828 (35%)     max: 20013 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5865     avg: 7291     median: 7784 (33%)     max: 8224 Points
min: 6647     avg: 7221     median: 7298.5 (31%)     max: 7639 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2583     avg: 2780     median: 2832 (71%)     max: 2871 Points
min: 2442     avg: 2551     median: 2551 (64%)     max: 2660 Points
min: 2527     avg: 2564     median: 2573 (64%)     max: 2584 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 10589     avg: 11042     median: 11095 (43%)     max: 11388 Points
min: 9498     avg: 9774     median: 9773.5 (38%)     max: 10049 Points
min: 9850     avg: 10006     median: 10010.5 (39%)     max: 10151 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2008     avg: 2051     median: 2049.5 (80%)     max: 2097 Points
min: 1852     avg: 1874     median: 1877.5 (73%)     max: 1888 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9491     avg: 9728     median: 9783.5 (18%)     max: 9855 Points
min: 8704     avg: 8890     median: 8931 (16%)     max: 8995 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
7753 Points (77%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
31261 Points (31%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 468     avg: 473     median: 475 (1%)     max: 476 ms
min: 507     avg: 523     median: 510 (1%)     max: 543 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 111219     avg: 113072     median: 113072 (87%)     max: 114924 Points
min: 97354     avg: 97895     median: 97895 (75%)     max: 98436 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 245     avg: 269.7     median: 277 (76%)     max: 287 Points
min: 249     avg: 258.3     median: 261 (72%)     max: 266 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 266     avg: 288.7     median: 290 (52%)     max: 310 Points
min: 272     avg: 280.7     median: 284 (51%)     max: 286 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1643     avg: 1715     median: 1738 (65%)     max: 1763 Points
min: 1555     avg: 1566     median: 1560 (58%)     max: 1582 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41     avg: 44.3     median: 41.5 (7%)     max: 50.4 Watt
min: 29.4     avg: 46     median: 49.5 (9%)     max: 55.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 41.5     avg: 49.8     median: 51.2 (9%)     max: 56.8 Watt
min: 50.5     avg: 52     median: 52.2 (10%)     max: 53.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.2     avg: 3.5     median: 3.7 (2%)     max: 3.7 Watt
min: 2.89     avg: 4.3     median: 4.4 (3%)     max: 5.43 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 3.2     avg: 4.8     median: 5.2 (6%)     max: 5.92 Watt
min: 4.27     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 6.69 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 28.5     avg: 33.2     median: 31.3 (23%)     max: 39.8 Points per Watt
min: 27.8     avg: 28.9     median: 28.8 (21%)     max: 30 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 7 268V → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 236V → 89% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 226V → 91% n=2

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 02. 13:42:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17991 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18009 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 18000 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 01 May 2025 05:16:08 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17991 +0.004s ... 0.015s

#9 got single benchmarks 17991 +0.007s ... 0.022s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18009 +0s ... 0.022s

#11 got single benchmarks 18009 +0.003s ... 0.025s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18000 +0.004s ... 0.029s

#13 got single benchmarks 18000 +0.007s ... 0.036s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.036s ... 0.072s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.072s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)