Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 750 vs Qualcomm Adreno 732 vs Qualcomm Adreno 735

Qualcomm Adreno 750

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 750 is an integrated graphics unit that is used in the Snapdragon 8 Gen. 3 and is designed for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (System-on-a-Chip) was introduced in October 2023 and can be found in many Android-based high-end products of the year 2024. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 25% over its predecessor, the Adreno 740, as well as a 25 % improvement in efficiency. The Adreno 750 can now additionally adjust frame rates to within 1 Hz (QSnyc), which should improve power consumption once again. 

With Snapdragon Elite Gaming, games are now possible at up to 240 FPS and the Adreno Frame Motion Engine 2.0 is now said to be able to accelerate games that are limited to 60 FPS to 120 FPS. Upscaling for games in 8k should also be possible. 

The Adreno 750 supports all common Android APIs and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 Lumens. 

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is manufactured in the current 4nm process at TSMC.

Qualcomm Adreno 732

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 732

The Qualcomm Adreno 732 is an integrated graphics unit that is used in the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 and is designed for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (system-on-a-chip) was introduced in March 2024 and can be found in many Android-based products in the upper mid-range and premium class.

According to rumors Qualcomm clocks the graphics chip at up to 950 MHz and uses two pipelines.

The performance is slightly above the Adreno 730 and below the 735 in our tests (as the name also suggests).

The Adreno 732 supports Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12.1. AI upscaling should make it possible to increase frame rates and improve the efficiency of some graphic effects without any major battery load.

Qualcomm Adreno 735

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 735

The Qualcomm Adreno 735 (Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 GPU) is an integrated graphics unit (iGPU) for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (system-on-a-chip), the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 was unveiled at the end of 2023 and can be found in Android-based high-end devices in 2024.

According to initial benchmarks, the GPU's performance is between the Adreno 730 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and the Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The GPU supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing and a game post processing accelerator (Bloom, Depth of Field, Motion Blur is accelerated). The following graphics APIs are supported: OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP, Vulkan 1.3.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 750Qualcomm Adreno 732Qualcomm Adreno 735
Adreno 700 Series
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 11, OpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement25.10.2023 23.03.2024 13.04.2024
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Adreno 750GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy8 x 2300 MHz? MHz1000 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 38 x 2300 MHz? MHz903 MHz
min. - max.? MHz903 - 1000 MHz
CPU in Adreno 732GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 38 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 735GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 38 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 13910     avg: 20925     median: 22040 (96%)     max: 23024 Points
15748 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 38076     avg: 43953     median: 44758 (98%)     max: 45492 Points
28632 Points (63%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 9984     avg: 16171     median: 17478 (74%)     max: 20131 Points
7666 Points (32%)
min: 7553     avg: 11252     median: 11751 (49%)     max: 13954 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 22388     avg: 29106     median: 28984 (72%)     max: 33376 Points
11506 Points (29%)
min: 12176     avg: 18081     median: 19249.5 (48%)     max: 21647 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
17553 Points (86%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
29890 Points (100%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 15108     avg: 18750     median: 19035 (10%)     max: 20321 Points
min: 11512     avg: 11583     median: 11583 (6%)     max: 11654 Points
min: 6661     avg: 11309     median: 12039 (6%)     max: 12985 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3991     avg: 4752     median: 4765 (6%)     max: 5190 Points
min: 2844     avg: 2976     median: 2975.5 (3%)     max: 3107 Points
min: 1659     avg: 2926     median: 3076 (4%)     max: 3332 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 27     avg: 36.1     median: 37 (14%)     max: 42 fps
min: 22     avg: 22.5     median: 22.5 (8%)     max: 23 fps
min: 12     avg: 20.4     median: 21 (8%)     max: 24 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 43     avg: 75.1     median: 75 (13%)     max: 96 fps
min: 49     avg: 49.5     median: 49.5 (9%)     max: 50 fps
min: 44     avg: 48.6     median: 48 (9%)     max: 55 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 92     avg: 186.4     median: 190 (14%)     max: 241 fps
min: 130     avg: 130.5     median: 130.5 (10%)     max: 131 fps
min: 111     avg: 137.6     median: 136 (10%)     max: 185 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 64     avg: 140.4     median: 147 (14%)     max: 162 fps
min: 105     avg: 109     median: 109 (10%)     max: 113 fps
min: 63     avg: 92.9     median: 99 (9%)     max: 110 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 90     avg: 240     median: 248 (5%)     max: 279 fps
min: 191     avg: 194.5     median: 194.5 (4%)     max: 198 fps
min: 111     avg: 166.6     median: 171 (4%)     max: 200 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 143     avg: 318.2     median: 326 (14%)     max: 387 fps
min: 271     avg: 284     median: 284 (12%)     max: 297 fps
min: 170     avg: 243.4     median: 265 (11%)     max: 287 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 750
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 189     avg: 487.4     median: 512.5 (4%)     max: 549 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 732
min: 491     avg: 496     median: 496 (4%)     max: 501 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 735
min: 292     avg: 430.1     median: 451 (4%)     max: 520 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 676800     avg: 747103     median: 754580 (75%)     max: 784286 Points
455425 Points (46%)
min: 360377     avg: 467209     median: 485070 (49%)     max: 538320 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 537309     avg: 774773     median: 792034 (63%)     max: 927463 Points
min: 477453     avg: 485942     median: 485942 (39%)     max: 494430 Points
min: 294513     avg: 474851     median: 505042 (40%)     max: 532103 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 212.26     avg: 248.6     median: 248.6 (6%)     max: 285 fps
min: 148.7     avg: 170.1     median: 170.1 (4%)     max: 191.5 fps
min: 179.33     avg: 187     median: 187 (5%)     max: 194.7 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 10798     avg: 14148     median: 14184 (4%)     max: 16784 Points
7837 Points (2%)
min: 8771     avg: 8905     median: 8844 (2%)     max: 9172 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 13579     avg: 15840     median: 16235 (4%)     max: 17531 Points
9183 Points (2%)
min: 9821     avg: 9981     median: 9942 (2%)     max: 10263 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
43633 Points (15%)
38490 Points (13%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
54938 Points (91%)
60368 Points (100%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.24     avg: 9     median: 8.9 (3%)     max: 15.2 Watt
min: 8.05     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (4%)     max: 11 Watt
min: 7.33     avg: 10.3     median: 10.8 (4%)     max: 12.1 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 732 → 65% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 735 → 68% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 750:
59.3 59.6 59.8 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 732:
59.9  fps
99%
Adreno 735:
59.2  fps
ultra Ultra
Adreno 732:
59.7  fps
Adreno 735:
59.1  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 750:
40 52 60 60.1 ~ 53 fps
110%
Adreno 732:
58.1  fps
83%
Adreno 735:
29.4 59.5 ~ 44 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 750:
59.8  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 750:
51 52 54 55 59.8 60 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
88%
Adreno 732:
40.7 60 ~ 50 fps
91%
Adreno 735:
29.9 51.8 59 59.2 60 ~ 52 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 750:
49 58 59.3 59.4 60 89 90 90 115.3 116.2 118 119 120 ~ 88 fps
100%
Adreno 732:
87.1 89 ~ 88 fps
78%
Adreno 735:
48.1 58.2 60 60 118 ~ 69 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 750:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 750:
40 58.1 59 59.3 59.5 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
103%
Adreno 732:
60  fps
103%
Adreno 735:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 750:
39.4 39.6 39.9 39.9 39.9 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 732:
39.4 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 735:
39 39.6 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 750:
60 60 98 103 ~ 80 fps
146%
Adreno 732:
117  fps
75%
Adreno 735:
60  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
high
100%
Adreno 750:
59.4  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 732 → 107%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 735 → 90%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 90%

Qualcomm Adreno 750Qualcomm Adreno 732Qualcomm Adreno 735
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal6059.959.759.259.1
Genshin Impact5359.85758.1504452
PUBG Mobile88605840886040696040
Dead Trigger 28011760
Asphalt 9: Legends59.4
Qualcomm Adreno 750Qualcomm Adreno 732Qualcomm Adreno 735
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
2

1
1

2
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1





2

3







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1





2

3







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 30. 07:57:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11624 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12763 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12721 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:17:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11624 +0s ... 0.003s

#10 got single benchmarks 11624 +0.003s ... 0.006s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12763 +0s ... 0.006s

#12 got single benchmarks 12763 +0s ... 0.006s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 12721 +0s ... 0.006s

#14 got single benchmarks 12721 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.007s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.01s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.01s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.021s

#19 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.021s

#20 Got 96 rows for game benchmarks. +0.017s ... 0.038s

#21 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.038s

#22 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.038s

#23 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.04s

#24 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.04s

#25 return log +0s ... 0.041s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)