Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 740 vs Qualcomm Adreno 732 vs Qualcomm Adreno 750

Qualcomm Adreno 740

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 740

The Qualcomm Adreno 740 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SoC. The chip will be available starting early 2023 and will be used mainly in high-end Android devices. 

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno GPU offers a 25% improved performance compared to the Adreno 730 predecessor in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. First benchmarks show that the Adreno GPU can even beat the Apple A16 GPU (iPhone 14 Pro series) in synthetic benchmarks. Therefore, the Adreno 740 is the fastest graphics chip for smartphones in 2022.

The iGPU supports hardware accelerated ray tracing and a game post processing accelerator (for bloom, depth of field and motion blur). Another first, is the support for Vulkan 1.3.

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is produced in the modern 4nm process at TSMC.

Qualcomm Adreno 732

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 732

The Qualcomm Adreno 732 is an integrated graphics unit that is used in the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 and is designed for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (system-on-a-chip) was introduced in March 2024 and can be found in many Android-based products in the upper mid-range and premium class.

According to rumors Qualcomm clocks the graphics chip at up to 950 MHz and uses two pipelines.

The performance is slightly above the Adreno 730 and below the 735 in our tests (as the name also suggests).

The Adreno 732 supports Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12.1. AI upscaling should make it possible to increase frame rates and improve the efficiency of some graphic effects without any major battery load.

Qualcomm Adreno 750

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 750 is an integrated graphics unit that is used in the Snapdragon 8 Gen. 3 and is designed for smartphones and tablets. The associated SoC (System-on-a-Chip) was introduced in October 2023 and can be found in many Android-based high-end products of the year 2024. 

Qualcomm promises a performance increase of up to 25% over its predecessor, the Adreno 740, as well as a 25 % improvement in efficiency. The Adreno 750 can now additionally adjust frame rates to within 1 Hz (QSnyc), which should improve power consumption once again. 

With Snapdragon Elite Gaming, games are now possible at up to 240 FPS and the Adreno Frame Motion Engine 2.0 is now said to be able to accelerate games that are limited to 60 FPS to 120 FPS. Upscaling for games in 8k should also be possible. 

The Adreno 750 supports all common Android APIs and is already prepared for use with the Unreal 5 Lumens. 

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is manufactured in the current 4nm process at TSMC.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 740Qualcomm Adreno 732Qualcomm Adreno 750
Adreno 700 Series
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 750
Adreno 740
Adreno 735 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732
Adreno 730 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 @ 0.8 GHz
Shared Memoryyesyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.3
technology4 nm4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement16.11.2022 23.03.2024 25.10.2023
CPU in Adreno 740GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy8 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 28 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 732GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 38 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 750GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy8 x 2300 MHz? MHz1000 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 38 x 2300 MHz? MHz903 MHz
min. - max.? MHz903 - 1000 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 12891     avg: 16677     median: 16746 (73%)     max: 18846 Points
min: 13910     avg: 20925     median: 22040 (96%)     max: 23024 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 25211     avg: 33069     median: 34390.5 (76%)     max: 38087 Points
min: 38076     avg: 43953     median: 44758 (98%)     max: 45492 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 10839     avg: 14511     median: 14696.5 (62%)     max: 16291 Points
7666 Points (32%)
min: 9984     avg: 16171     median: 17478 (74%)     max: 20131 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 18010     avg: 24115     median: 24891.5 (62%)     max: 26802 Points
11506 Points (29%)
min: 22388     avg: 29106     median: 28984 (72%)     max: 33376 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
0 Points (0%)
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
14235 Points (70%)
17553 Points (86%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
24605 Points (82%)
29890 Points (100%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 9805     avg: 13918     median: 14012 (7%)     max: 14789 Points
min: 11512     avg: 11583     median: 11583 (6%)     max: 11654 Points
min: 15108     avg: 18750     median: 19035 (10%)     max: 20321 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3088     avg: 3641     median: 3700 (4%)     max: 3900 Points
min: 2844     avg: 2976     median: 2975.5 (3%)     max: 3107 Points
min: 3991     avg: 4752     median: 4765 (6%)     max: 5190 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 18     avg: 29.3     median: 30 (11%)     max: 33 fps
min: 22     avg: 22.5     median: 22.5 (8%)     max: 23 fps
min: 27     avg: 36.1     median: 37 (14%)     max: 42 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 24     avg: 60.8     median: 62.5 (11%)     max: 72 fps
min: 49     avg: 49.5     median: 49.5 (9%)     max: 50 fps
min: 43     avg: 75.1     median: 75 (13%)     max: 96 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 82     avg: 147.5     median: 155.5 (12%)     max: 181 fps
min: 130     avg: 130.5     median: 130.5 (10%)     max: 131 fps
min: 92     avg: 186.4     median: 190 (14%)     max: 241 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 67     avg: 120.2     median: 126 (12%)     max: 166 fps
min: 105     avg: 109     median: 109 (10%)     max: 113 fps
min: 64     avg: 140.4     median: 147 (14%)     max: 162 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 108     avg: 199.4     median: 213 (5%)     max: 226 fps
min: 191     avg: 194.5     median: 194.5 (4%)     max: 198 fps
min: 90     avg: 240     median: 248 (5%)     max: 279 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 115     avg: 277.5     median: 288 (12%)     max: 346 fps
min: 271     avg: 284     median: 284 (12%)     max: 297 fps
min: 143     avg: 318.2     median: 326 (14%)     max: 387 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 740
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 301     avg: 456.8     median: 480.5 (4%)     max: 502 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 732
min: 491     avg: 496     median: 496 (4%)     max: 501 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 750
min: 189     avg: 487.4     median: 512.5 (4%)     max: 549 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 449271     avg: 555498     median: 570026 (57%)     max: 590837 Points
455425 Points (46%)
min: 676800     avg: 747103     median: 754580 (75%)     max: 784286 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 469023     avg: 583912     median: 590587 (47%)     max: 611661 Points
min: 477453     avg: 485942     median: 485942 (39%)     max: 494430 Points
min: 537309     avg: 774773     median: 792034 (63%)     max: 927463 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 208.55     avg: 211     median: 210.4 (5%)     max: 214.17 fps
min: 148.7     avg: 170.1     median: 170.1 (4%)     max: 191.5 fps
min: 212.26     avg: 248.6     median: 248.6 (6%)     max: 285 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 6548     avg: 8858     median: 8918 (2%)     max: 9784 Points
7837 Points (2%)
min: 10798     avg: 14148     median: 14184 (4%)     max: 16784 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 3587     avg: 9009     median: 9361 (2%)     max: 10144 Points
9183 Points (2%)
min: 13579     avg: 15840     median: 16235 (4%)     max: 17531 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
43633 Points (15%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
54938 Points (91%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.83     avg: 9.5     median: 9.7 (4%)     max: 14.5 Watt
min: 8.05     avg: 9.5     median: 9.5 (4%)     max: 11 Watt
min: 3.24     avg: 9     median: 8.9 (3%)     max: 15.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 740 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 732 → 82% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 127% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 732:
59.9  fps
100%
Adreno 750:
59.3 59.6 59.8 ~ 60 fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 732:
59.7  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Adreno 740:
58.5 60.1 ~ 59 fps
98%
Adreno 732:
58.1  fps
90%
Adreno 750:
40 52 60 60.1 ~ 53 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 740:
60.1  fps
100%
Adreno 750:
59.8  fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 740:
59 59.2 59.6 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
83%
Adreno 732:
40.7 60 ~ 50 fps
95%
Adreno 750:
51 52 54 55 59.8 60 60 60 60 ~ 57 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 740:
59 60 60 60 60 61 63 117 119 120 ~ 78 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 60 60 60 60 87.5 87.8 89 90 90 ~ 72 fps
122%
Adreno 732:
87.1 89 ~ 88 fps
122%
Adreno 750:
49 58 59.3 59.4 60 89 90 90 115.3 116.2 118 119 120 ~ 88 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 740:
60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 750:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 740:
56.8 59 59.3 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 60 fps
100%
Adreno 732:
60  fps
97%
Adreno 750:
40 58.1 59 59.3 59.5 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 ~ 58 fps
ultra
100%
Adreno 740:
39.5 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 732:
39.4 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Adreno 750:
39.4 39.6 39.9 39.9 39.9 40 40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
high
100%
Adreno 740:
60  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 740:
116  fps
101%
Adreno 732:
117  fps
69%
Adreno 750:
60 60 98 103 ~ 80 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Adreno 740:
60  fps
high
100%
Adreno 740:
60  fps
99%
Adreno 750:
59.4  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 740:
120  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 740 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 732 → 101%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 97%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 750 → 97%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 97%

Qualcomm Adreno 740Qualcomm Adreno 732Qualcomm Adreno 750
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal606059.959.760
Genshin Impact5960.16058.1505359.857
Armajet78
PUBG Mobile7260604088604088605840
World of Tanks Blitz60
Dead Trigger 211611780
Asphalt 9: Legends606059.4
Subway Surfers120
Qualcomm Adreno 740Qualcomm Adreno 732Qualcomm Adreno 750
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
3


2


5
1
1
2






< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1





2

3







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
2

1
1

2
1

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.33
log 30. 07:44:35

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11440 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12763 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 11624 +0s ... 0s

#4 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:17:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.002s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11440 +0s ... 0.003s

#10 got single benchmarks 11440 +0.003s ... 0.006s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 12763 +0s ... 0.006s

#12 got single benchmarks 12763 +0s ... 0.006s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11624 +0s ... 0.006s

#14 got single benchmarks 11624 +0.002s ... 0.009s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.009s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.012s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.012s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.012s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.012s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.024s

#21 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.024s

#22 Got 178 rows for game benchmarks. +0.034s ... 0.058s

#23 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.058s

#24 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.059s

#25 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.062s

#26 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.062s

#27 return log +0.001s ... 0.062s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)